Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems face recruitment problems in key Senate contests (mydd)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 02:41 PM
Original message
Dems face recruitment problems in key Senate contests (mydd)
From Chris Bowers at http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/5/29/15267/1704#commenttop --

<SNIP>

However, right now this situation does not seem to be translating into many good pickup opportunities. Off hand, the problem seems to center around recruitment problems. In some states, we are failing to get our top recruits. In other states, our top recruits now seem less promising than they did just a couple months ago. Worst of all, in most states, we don't have any challengers yet. Here is a quick look at some of our top pickup opportunities:
Colorado. This is clearly our best pickup opportunity in 2008, and I still think the seat is beyond "toss-up" and has become, instead, "lean Democratic." However, Mark Udall's recent votes against a fully funded withdrawal, and then in favor of a four-month blank check, isn't exactly making me feel very excited about our great chances here.


Maine. A lot of us were optimistic about challenging Susan Collins, including me, especially with top-tier recruit Rep. Tom Allen in the race. However, the first poll on the campaign shows the difficulty of anyone challenging a Senator with an approval rating over 65%, and net favorables in excess of 40%. According to Critical Insights, Collins currently leads Allen 57-30. Collins is well over 50%, and the 27% point gap can't be explained away simply on name ID, since Allen has represented half of Maine for years. This might be much more of a longshot than I had originally anticipated.


Minnesota. Al Franken's entry into the race, along with his strong fundraising, appears to have scared off other Democrats from challenging highly vulnerable Republican incumbent Norm Coleman. However, as much as many of us might like Al, there are reasons to be worried about this. Polling has consistently shown Coleman hovering either just above or just below 50%. At the same time, it has also shown a fairly name recognition for Al Franken, who trails Coleman by 10-20%, depending on the poll. More worrisome are Franken's favorable numbers, which are actually slightly negative according to both Rasmussen and the Mason-Dixon. That is not a formula for making up ground on a right-wing Senator in a bluish state would is very beatable. If Franken's favorables remain in negative territory, there is no way he can win this race.


New Hampshire. The situation in New Hampshire isn't all that bad. In fact, considering recent recruiting problems in Oregon, this is now probably our second best pickup opportunity. However, it is wide open, which means it is far from certain to be a Democratic pickup. The two announced Democratic candidates are LieberDem Katrina Swett and Portsmouth mayor Steve Marchand. I have no idea who has the inside track in the primary, or even if Jean Sheehan will enter the campaign. However, I do know that Sheehan already leads Republican incumbent Sununu in the polls, and Marchand would thus probably have a more difficult time than Sheehan. Then again, considering Sheehan's 2002 loss, and the great people-powered victories in New Hampshire in 2006, maybe Marchand would actually have a better chance. If Swett wins the nomination, the gag suppressant industry in New Hampshire might start booming in the fall of 2008.


Oregon. If Rep. DeFazio had chosen to run, Oregon would have immediately joined Colorado as a "lean Democratic" pickup opportunity. However, in the worst recruiting defeat for Senate Democrats in years, he passed on the campaign. Not long after that, Rep. Blumenauer also passed. Now, our chances to defeat Gordon Smith, which were already complicated by Smith's defection on Iraq, appear to rest with Steve Novick. While Novick appears to be quite brilliant and a dedicated progressive activist in the Wellstone mold, he faces a far more uphill battle than either DeFazio or Blumenauer would have faced. In short, instead of this seat being lean Democratic, right now it is, at best, lean Republican. A Novick win is possible, and would be fantastic, but I am quite nervous about this seat right now. It should have been fairly easy.


The rest. In every other state that can be clearly identified as a pickup opportunity, we simply don't have a Democratic candidate yet. Solid pickup opportunities such as New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas, and Virginia lack candidates. Somewhat more difficult opportunities like Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Nebraska and Oklahoma also lack candidates. We even lack potential candidates who are just considering a run in states like Alaska, Kansas, Mississippi, Tennessee and Wyoming. We do have a challenger in Idaho, but that feels like small comfort considering our holes.

<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. One interesting note on the GOP side
I read an article in the Sunday New Orleans Times-Picayune where the gop may be courting a former democratic representative to switch parties to run against Mary Landrieu. They may be finding that seat to hot to tackle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's still early.
But we do need to get some top tier candidates to run if we want to pick up some more seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC