Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry: If it's not true, what should he do?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:36 AM
Original message
Kerry: If it's not true, what should he do?
I just think that him going on a few shows and denying it will not squash the rumors at all. It will be too Clinton-like. I did not have sexual relations with that intern. If it's not true, he needs to do a lot more.

What's stopping him from sueing Drudge? Anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. He should turn it against Bush
treat it like a smear and attack Bush for not focusing on the nation's serious problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. exactly
another example of how the Repubs will lie, cheat, and do whatever it takes to divert attention from their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It isn't like Kerry is focusing on the "nation's serious problems"
All he has is the AWOL story it seems.

The Republicans have been probably sitting on this, waiting until Kerry had it locked up. Kerry's alpha attacks on Bush's service record probably prompted the Repugs to pull out their guns. Because Kerry couldn't refrain from strutting it may have caused the Repugs to start firing--and it would be better that they do it now, before we are trapped with a potentially compromised nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think he should do absolutely nothing
kind of like when your kid has a temper tantrum - don't enable them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well
what else can he do? Give some complicated response? Then people would really think he is trying to hide something.

He gave an acceptable response this morning on Imus. A simple "No".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. What was the question to which Kerrry replied "No?"
I didn't see Imus. What was the question that illicited the "no?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. If it's not true, he should just say so and then point out that this is
just tabloid sleeze put out by KKKarl and Co. to divert America's attention from the real problems facing all of us.

If it is true, it has nothing to do with me, or the future of my children and grandchildren. I am sooooo damn tired of having to listen to the details of other people's sex lives. Leave the private lives to the individual. Concentrate on the public sins. Like being AWOL, scrubbing one's criminal record, taking a country to war based on lies, etc.

The only thing about this that does piss me of is if there is some truth to this issue of Kerry and an affair, and he thought that he could hide it, I'll be really angry. If he lets the election get sandbagged by a "sexgate" type of thing, he needs to have his butt kicked. If he knew that there was a possibility that they would dig up some sleaze, he should have been up front about it in the first place, not just sit around waiting to see if someone finds out. But if this is just more of KKKarl's infamous political tactics, then he needs to fight back. Make them come up with these women (or their blue dresses), or shut the hell up. Make them prove it's true. If they can't, than keep pounding the hell out of the fact that the only thing that republican's can ever find to run on is stuff that is nobody's damn business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's a non issue
he's been planning this campaign for a VERY long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. So was Bill Clinton.
And he still didn't keep his in his pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. It's not a non-issue to MILLIONS of voters and the VRWC knows this. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Good point...
IF (and as of now it's still a VERY BIG IF), Kerry did have an affair, then I will NOT forgive him for running in the first place. The party is trusting him as the "electable" candidate, for God's sake! Millions of democrats are placing their hope in him. They trust him. Our future is at stake here...Not only the party's, but the nation's.

I also wouldn't be able to forgive the other candidates, because if there is dirt on each of these candidates, I want it out in the open BEFORE they get the nomination. I want the dirt out there before the nomination and I want the candidate completely battle tested. Clinton did pretty well in the GE, because by that time it was known he had evaded the draft and that he had an afffair with Gennifer Flowers.

I'm hoping like hell this story will collapse under its own weight of being a bunch of absolute bullshit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. BINGO!
I hope to hell it's NOT true, but like you, I want it to come out NOW if it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's a public figure, so he can't win a lawsuit.
The rules that apply to ordinary folks in defamatyion/slander/libel cases do not apply to 'public figures'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. I kind of remember his wife Terera saying
she wouldn't hesitate using her vast resources if things became personal. Well, this is as personal as it gets and I think she should get a good lawyer and sue the crap out of Drudge. I don't think she'll have any problem claiming he printed with malicious intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Can't sue if it's true. Apparently Kerry staffers have been prepared for
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 08:05 AM by Tinoire
this coming out for a long time and assure us they are "prepared to deal with it". His affairs seem to be an open secret in Washington and some journalists are reporting that they're the reason Gore did not pick him as a running mate.

Currently there are stories of two women up but I've only seen the name & picture of one.

I hope his staffers are prepared to handle his wife. What a spitfire!

==
She was reported as fidgeting while Senator Kerry made speeches, of interrupting him, of failing to gaze at him adoringly in the accepted manner. On the subject of marital fidelity, she said: 'I used to say to my husband, my late husband, "If you ever get something, I'll maim you. I won't kill you. I'll maim you".' And asked whether she would take her husband's name, she shot back: 'Politically, it's going to be Teresa Heinz Kerry, but I don't give a shit, you know? There are other things to worry about.'

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1130604,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 08:13 AM by La_Serpiente
that is funny. I don't think Mrs. Heinz doesn't take crap from most people.

the freepers would go nuts over her - probably even more than Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I am getting to the point where I like the candidates' wives
better than the candidates themselves.

Judy Dean? A+
Teresa Heinz? A+ (from what I've seen)

Maybe we should ask them to run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. What if it is true?
Then what should he do?

You don't really think the Republicans are going to let go of this? especially with the AWOL story getting so much press.

This is tit for tat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. According to some- keep leading us to a train wreck
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, obviously Kerry should consult DU
and take the advice of people who never wanted to see him nominated, since they are showing so much concern about this "issue" </sarcasm>

(This is not directed at the original poster)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerryistheanswer Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Right - because the people on DU are rational and objective
And wanted JK to drop out in September and have always hated his guts because he is a more qualified, more appealing candidate in the eyes of most Democrats as compared to their hero.

Any candidate would be stupid to listen to most of the junk posted on this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Where did the ABB crowd go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkey007 Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. That would be a great way to draw even more attention to
yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC