Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Guest Who Stayed Past Election ...: Someone needs to tell Ralph Nader it's time to go home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 07:53 PM
Original message
The Guest Who Stayed Past Election ...: Someone needs to tell Ralph Nader it's time to go home
There is always one guy at every party who outstays his welcome. Long after the bar closes, he is still pouring drink after drink from the untended bottle. He stalks the other guests as they try to leave, assaulting them with his wisdom. It is as though having failed to be the life of the party, he finds solace in being the life after the party. Or maybe he just has nowhere else to go. His exhausted hosts try hinting without success, until finally he must be told straight out: "Friend, the party is over, it is time to go home."

http://www.poppolitics.com/articles/2000/11/The_Guest_Who_Stayed_Past_Election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. he needs to LOUDLY apologize for screwing up Gore and delivering the election to Bush.
Edited on Sat May-05-07 07:59 PM by marylanddem
Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let me 2nd and heartily AMEN that notion! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. shouldn't you have posted this in the history forum? 7 years ago?
Nader is worth listening not voting for.........
He is right on the rampant corporatism, I would love to have him
head the EPA in our new democratic administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Firstly, I realize it's old, but it showed up on Google News today.
I still thought it's relevant because there will likely be some other attempted spoiler candidate if not him.

Secondly, any of a number of other environmental and consumer advocates could make the same cases he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Every state with a Democratic Secretary of State take notice
They should use Katherine Harris/Kenneth Blackwell type of tactics to keep that little shit off of their states' ballots in 2008.

This is the future of the nation we are talking about here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, I disagree. If people are stupid enough to vote for him, and he turns an election
then they will get what they deserve

No difference Mr. Nader, BULL

You are right the future of the nation IS AT STAKE, and I actually believe that people NOW realize it

I predict that the Democrats will NOT only take back ALL three branches of government in 2008, BUT IN A HUGE WAY


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Just pelt the guy with eggs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oglethorpe Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. So....
So in order to ensure the future of the nation, we should take illegal actions to keep him off of the ballot? Kind of like razing the village to save it, wouldn't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Simply amazing,
isn't it? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fully understanding this topic is almost always flammable,
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:06 PM by AtomicKitten
and in deference to those that are okay with Ralph - I have some genuine mixed feelings about him myself - right now when I see him or hear his voice, I think - or within about 10 seconds end up thinking: please stop talking and go away.

Sorry if that offends anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. self-delete
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:06 PM by AtomicKitten
puter spaz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Slow night?
There must be something better to do than read articles from 2000 about Nader.That can't be healthy.You should watch Children of Men or something.I just watched it and I give it 3 Forks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. How much would you like to wager that he will not run in 2008?
$100?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. ...and he'll have even less impact than he had in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. come on - this is the way to start a conversation at DU
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:15 PM by AtomicKitten
Sometimes people would like to talk about stuff that IS current - Ralph is coming to life - I hear his voice on CSPAN, on the radio - HE LIVES! - and people want to resurrect OLD Ralph issues, something about an election around 1999 or 2000 or so when something bad happened and then a whole lot of other really bad stuff kept happening, for a long time now ...

but I digress.

Ralph is current. Ralph is quacking. I'd like to talk about OUR elephant in the Blue Room as he exists in my world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. ok, so let's have a conversation.
Still a slow night and I'm trying to avoid doing some organizing that I desperately need to do, so let's have at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. This BOZO handed the Bush Cheney Regime the keys to the kingdom.
Edited on Sat May-05-07 08:17 PM by L. Coyote
History should never forget what this man did to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nader is an example of why we can't vote third party in 08'
Edited on Sun May-06-07 09:06 AM by Kerry2008
He cost Gore the White House in 2000, along with Bush cheating, and now look what we have. If Ralph does it again in 2008, we'll have four to eight more years of Republican rule. I don't know about you Ralph, but I prefer President Obama or President Edwards over President Giuliani or President Romney! Yuck. I feel dirty after putting the word "President" before Romney and Giuliani's name, time for a shower!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. shifting blame off Republicans and on to Nader for vote fraud in FL has got to be one of Republicans
most effective moves after 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I wouldn't think so.
I've never even heard that argument before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'll try this again.
It's my fault that it wasn't clear.

Shifting the blame for Gore's loss in FL off Republican vote fraud and on to Nader is one of the Republicans' most successful strategies for keeping themselves from looking like total crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I wouldn't think so.
I know about the vote fraud too. You're talking about that thing from The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. kicked and recommended for two reasons
1. Good article
2. Someone on this board believed "recommends" are a measurement of a post's accuracy and I sure don't want to disappoint!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. He was already way irrelevant in 2004 - yet MSM polled for him as if he was a 3rd
choice. There were other independs challenging W for a change - and unlike Nader the Cadaver, they were registered in all states- yet MSM chose to harp on Ralph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. "it is time to go home", but the unity enforcement squad keeps dragging him back through the door.
:shrug: The man has more staying power than any "irrelevant" figure in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Rwalsh Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. The SCOTUS put Bush in the White House but...
Nader is indirectly responsible for that. His presence made the race close enough for the SCOTUS (and the lower courts) to get involved.

Take out Nader and the election would never have gone to the courts. Why? Because Gore's margin of victory would have been big enough to make what happened in Florida irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC