Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tenet,-"a sniveling C.I.A. chief bullied by “remote” Condi" whow HO HO>

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 07:32 AM
Original message
Tenet,-"a sniveling C.I.A. chief bullied by “remote” Condi" whow HO HO>

Sorry, but i do not subscribe-so only have the headline:

OP-ED COLUMNIST
TimesSelect More Like an Air Ball
By MAUREEN DOWD
Slam-Dunk, a k a George Tenet, shows us his tender side, a sniveling C.I.A. chief bullied by “remote” Condi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds really interesting ~ wish someone had the full story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's some:
No matter how eager Slam Dunk was to tell W. what he wanted to hear while polishing the president’s shoes, the intelligence they craved did not exist. "Let me say it again: C.I.A. found absolutely no linkage between Saddam and 9/11," the ex-Head Spook writes in his new book, self-effacingly titled "At the Center of the Storm." Besides, Junior and Darth had already decided to go to war to show the Arabs their moxie.

<snip>

Slam Dunk always presented himself as the ultimate guy’s guy, a cigar-chomping spymaster who swapped jokes with the president. But now he shows us his tender side, a sniveling C.I.A. chief bullied by "remote" Condi.

He says Condi panicked in October 2002 and made him call a Times reporter, Alison Mitchell, who covered the Congressional debate about invading Iraq. In essence, he hypocritically told Alison to disregard the conclusions of his own agency, which had said that the links between Saddam and terrorist groups were tenuous, and that Saddam would take the extreme step of joining with Islamic fanatics only if he thought the U.S. was about to attack him. His nose growing as long as his cigar, he said nothing in the C.I.A. report contradicted the president’s case for war.

"In retrospect," Slam writes, "I shouldn’t have talked to the New York Times reporter at Condi’s request. By making public comments in the middle of a contentious political debate, I gave the impression that I was becoming a partisan player."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "I gave the impression that I was becoming a partisan player"
Gee, ya think so?

(However much I detest the man for going along, I am still very pleased that he is coming out with it all now. Remember the Truth Commissions in South Africa, where even the lowest of the low came and TOLD THE DAMNED TRUTH. We are all too ready for that now, including from the collaborators).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah but he's not coming out with it "all" now. He says there was no torture, just
"agressive interrogation" techniques. That was on his watch at CIA; he knew what was going on. The CIA wasn't sending folks to Egypt and other countries for their health.

He's evidently more outraged at the "damage" to his "reputation" as if he were the victim, rather than at terrible damage to the nation and the consequences in the world of the war and policies he aided and abetted. His book apparently is more concerned with providing a basis for the rehab of his "reputation" rather than providing the truth of it all, including his active role in peddling bogus dubious "intel" like the aluminum tubes crap to Congress and the public. Tenet is now, as before, primarily self-serving and still not fully coming clean.

Letter to Tenet from former intel officers on Larry Johnson's blog: http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/04/letter_to_georg.html#more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC