Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Perrino Doesn't Dispute CREW: Calling Fitzgerald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Dana Perrino Doesn't Dispute CREW: Calling Fitzgerald
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/13/dana-perrino-doesnt-dispute-crew-calling-fitzgerald

Dana Perrino doesn’t dispute CREW: Calling Fitzgerald

By: John Amato on Friday, April 13th, 2007 at 3:15 PM - PDT During the presser today, CNN asked Perrino about CREW's report on the missing emails that violate the Presidential Records Act. She didn't dispute their claims.

http://www.imgred.com/

Download (3) | Play (0) Download (3) | Play (0)

Now CREW is asking Patrick Fitzgerald to reopen the Rove case because of his missing emails…

Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, said today, "It looks like Karl Rove may well have destroyed evidence that implicated him in the White House's orchestrated efforts to leak Valerie Plame Wilson's covert identity to the press in retaliation against her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson." Sloan continued, "Special Counsel Fitzgerald should immediately reopen his investigation into whether Rove took part in the leak as well as whether he obstructed justice in the ensuing leak investigation."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just tell me which laws these thugs did not break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it just me, or isn't that assistant /wh press secretary a little on the creepy side. As
women go. There is something a little odd about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, stutter and dodge and stonewall!
"...stutter, well, you know, I'm not disagreeing, because, you know, it's ... it would not have been intentional ... and I guess what I'm saying ... is ... there are ways to recover these and the White House is looking into that ... and it's too early to say whether ... stutter ..."

That about covers it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's embarrassing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC