Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Monica Goodling, Just 1 Of Over 150 "Little Pat Robertson's" Working For Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:06 PM
Original message
Monica Goodling, Just 1 Of Over 150 "Little Pat Robertson's" Working For Bush
http://web.archive.org/web/19991008153443/
Once again, another Monica appears to be about to bring a government down to its knees. This time at least its deserved.

SOURCE: Salon

Who's the Boss?
How Pat Robertson's law school is changing America.

By Dahlia Lithwick
Posted Saturday, April 7, 2007, at 6:52 AM ET

Monica Goodling has a problem. As senior counsel to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Justice Department liaison to the White House, Goodling no longer seems to know what the truth is. She must also be increasingly unclear about who her superiors are. This didn't used to be a problem for Goodling, now on indefinite leave from the DoJ. Everything was once very certain: Her boss's truth was always the same as God's truth. Her boss was always either God or one of His staffers.

This week, through counsel, Goodling again refused to testify about her role in the firings of several U.S. attorneys for what appear to be partisan reasons. Asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, Goodling somehow felt she may be on the hook for criminal obstruction. But it was never clear whose truths she was protecting or even whose law seems to have tripped her up. She resigned abruptly Friday evening without explanation.

Goodling is an improbable character for a political scandal. She's the mirror opposite of that other Monica—the silly, saucy minx who felled Bill Clinton. A 1995 graduate of an evangelical Christian school, Messiah College, and a 1999 graduate of Pat Robertson's Regent University School of Law (this seems to be her Web page), Goodling's chief claim to professional fame appears to have been loyalty to the president and to the process of reshaping the Justice Department in his image (and thus, His image). A former career official there told the Washington Post that Goodling "forced many very talented, career people out of main Justice so she could replace them with junior people that were either loyal to the administration or would score her some points." And as she rose at Justice, according to a former classmate, Goodling "developed a very positive reputation for people coming from Christian schools into Washington looking for employment in government."

more: http://www.slate.com/id/2163601/pagenum/all/#page_start


*** - Regent University's Motto: "Christian Leadership To Change the World".

Change = Destroy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many people are polishing up their resumes for
the day we finally get rid of this corrupt, pretend religious,regime?

MAN< i see THOUSANDS of jobs opening up! I don't think any of us knowjust how many capable, goo, people have been replaced in every nook and crany of the Fed gov't over the last6 years! And we wonder why nothing seems to work????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The good news about all those little "Pat Robinsons" running around
They will be very easy to identify and to fire, come 2009 (or sooner, if FSM is willing). A bit of housecleaning, Democratic style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. only to send the American Taliban into seclusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. they did this at EVERY opportunity...
dumped competent people or, as in Iraq, appointed people to positions they were vastly unqualified for. Young hacks send to Iraq to manage the aftermath....incredibly stupid appointments to agencies like HOmeland Security....it never ends...they intended to recreate the USA as a one-party state and didn't who got hurt, or even if the country got hurt.

to say this is criminal negligence is a terrible understatement...I'll bet my next paycheck agaist Karl Rove's that in this case, the surface is barely scratched...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We should not be ashamed to call it political negligence
Political change is the cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Paul J. McNulty seems to be in the center of this.
It's time for him to turn over all communications. And a certain focus should be paid to Barbara Comstock, who was a close mentor to these ideologues at RNC opposition research team, and again at DoJ.

There is a HUGE scandal here, just below the surface. Time to sweep everything up, related or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Uh yeah...
"There is a HUGE scandal here...

I agree!!! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. i agree with more focus on Comstock as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't believe it's self-incrimination she's worried about
She knows that if she testifies she will have to incriminate those who employed her. The committees need to immunize her and get her up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. loyalty to a figurehead trumps integrity and one's oath for these Party worshipers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. BTW, Dahlia, that Silly, saucy minks just graduated from the
London School of Economics, one of the best schools in the world..

How dare you even mention her in the same article as a graduate of Pat Robertson's Lawyers are Us school...

Just kidding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. These people will be a problem for the next 30 - 40 years
as long as the GOP can take the WH again. This woman is the exact person John Dean referred to when he said to impeach and/or otherwise go after the lower level people, convict them and bar them from any future government service. We should have learned this lesson after Watergate. We should have learned this lesson after Iran-Contra. Now, we're going to make the same mistake and there is the biggest crop ever of these very young people that will poison government for the next up to 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. THESE PEOPLE ARE A CANCER IN OUR NATION
QED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I heard that Regent University isn't accredited. Is that true?
It's no wonder this administration is poxed with incompetency. Question 2:(See below)Why haven't the career people forced out of DOJ positions complained about this?

...."A former career official there told the Washington Post that Goodling "forced many very talented, career people out of main Justice so she could replace them with junior people that were either loyal to the administration or would score her some points." And as she rose at Justice, according to a former classmate, Goodling "developed a very positive reputation for people coming from Christian schools into Washington looking for employment in government." "


Question 3: In previewing the above the sad smiley appeared. I do not know how I did this...is it some HTML thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The symbol for the sad smiley is : (
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 03:22 PM by Vincardog
You wrote "Question 2: (See below)" but it came out "Question 2:(See below)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Dah! I couldn't see the forest for all those darn trees! Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. No, its not true
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 06:40 PM by onenote
Regent's Law School is ABA accredited and its other schools also appear to be accredited.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regent_University

BTW, I find the reaction to the fact that 150 Regent grads work for the government to be rather overblown. First, the claim that 150 Regent U grads are working in the bush administration comes from Regent U itself, so I'll take it with a grain of salt. Second, depending on how you define the bush admin, its a drop in the bucket. There are over 1.5 million civilian employees in the executive branch of the government, with over a quarter million in DC alone. I'd bet that Regent isn't in the top 10 of universities with graduates "working" in the bush administration (heck, one-third of the bush cabinet attended Harvard either for undergrad or grad school).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. whew! that makes me feel better.....I think! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Maybe I'm carrying this too far but....
About Regent University
The nation's academic center for Christian thought and action

It's more than a description of Regent University, it's a way of life. As America's premier graduate school dedicated to combining quality education with biblical teachings, Regent continues to produce Christian leaders who will make a difference, who will change the world.

The above is in the "About Us" section from the university's site....sorry I'm still not impressed. Small,"new" school with an agenda,imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Just so long as you keep tabs on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrak Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Monica only answers to Jesus?
Her boss is a carpenter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. and the oath to uphold the Constitution and the law of the US are superfilous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC