Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 States Introduce Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:18 PM
Original message
10 States Introduce Impeachment
By David Swanson

In 10 U.S. states, either this year or last year or both, the state legislature has introduced and considered, though not yet passed, a bill to petition the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach Bush and Cheney. The question, of course, is what in the heck is wrong with the other 40 states? We can't find a single state legislator with the decency to uphold the U.S. Constitution and at least introduce a resolution to impeach? Where are the states that created the Constitution? Where are Massachusetts and Virginia? What's holding up New York? Where in the world is Oregon? Is this all the pressure we can muster in the cause of justice?

But let's give credit where it's due. These 10 states have acted: CA, HI, IL, MN, MO, WA, VT, NM, WI, TX. These 10 legislators who've taken the lead should be drafted to run for Congress (except for Ellison, whom we've already elected to Congress): Les Ihara, Jr. HI; Lon Burnam TX; Gerald Ortiz y Pino NM; Eric Oemig WA; Paul Koretz CA; Daryl Pillsbury VT; Karen Yarbrough IL; Jamilah Nasheed MO; Frank Boyle WI; and Keith Ellison MN. Special credit goes to Oemig and Ortiz y Pino who have come close to passing their bills.

Of course, at the local level, dozens of cities and towns have passed these resolutions, and dozens more are trying. Vermont is far and away in the lead in the number of resolutions passed, but its Congress Member has not yet responded. While the national Green Party backs impeachment, so do at least 16 state Democratic parties. A list of all these resolutions, passed and pending, can be found at http://www.impeachpac.org/resolutions-list



Last Congress, 39 Congress Members signed onto a redundant bill, a bill to conduct a preliminary investigation into grounds for impeachment. I call this redundant because an impeachment hearing simply is a preliminary investigation. There's no serious doubt that there are grounds to begin such a hearing. The problem is that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has ordered her party not to impeach, even though the Constitution says otherwise.



Well, we've got news for you, Nancy. The public still cares about the rule of law, and we care less about your certainty that you can help elect a Democrat to take the throne in 2009 than we do about turning that throne back into a desk chair. On April 28, a crowd of 2,000 people will use their bodies to spell impeachment on the beach in San Francisco and then march to your house. The same day, your state's Democratic Party Convention in San Diego (where you'll be, pretending it's election season) will be going about the nation's business by backing impeachment. I plan to speak at an impeachment rally in front of Fanuiel Hall in Boston also on April 28th. And as it happens, President Bush will be speaking at a college graduation in Miami, Fla., on April 28, and he can expect to hear the cry for impeachment. Meanwhile, in Cleveland on A28, Congressman Dennis Kucinich will speak out for impeachment.



In New York's Central Park on April 28th, a crowd will spell out the word IMPEACH on the grass. Another thousand people will do the same at Coney Island, and then spell it out with pizza pies on the boardwalk. Both events are being organized by military mothers with sons who served in Iraq. A pilot will fly a banner saying "IMPEACH!" around NYC and take aerial photographs of the human murals.



Up in Minneapolis on A28, citizens will be spelling out "IMPEACH!" with canoes on a lake. That evening they'll form the letters with bed sheets lit from below so that people will be able to read it from planes passing overhead. In our nation's capital, 1,000 people will form a human mural to spell out IMPEACH! at the base of the Washington monument. Remember Washington, the guy who chose NOT to be king?



In fact, events are being planned for April 28th all over the country and outside of it, and you can find one or create one at http://www.a28.org



Here are a few of the reasons we have no choice but to take this step: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/articles


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. So in the quest to win in 09, we forget about how damaged this country
has become under dimson. I'm with you, David Swanson; I prefer action to letting this cancer on America skulk away unscathed.
Nom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't it interesing
...that this has NEVER come up on the bush-licking msm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. 20% and Counting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. So 20% of the states now have some sort of impeachment actions going?
good thing we have such a great and liberal media that covers the news ....

It is only going to get worse for bush .... my bet is that very soon it will be the
repugs in the house and senate who start to lead the calls for impeachment &
removal.

Come on Jay Rockefeller release the pre war intel!

bush's handlers know he is hated by the people & are working 24/7 to keep him
from having to meet Americans in any real way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's our message to the rest of the world ,He doesn't speak for Most of u.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Critically important
We all have to go the extra mile
stand up like never before
or give til it hurts
call your politscum

go go go go
this is not a test!

Love DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hear, hear. Supported by my town of Chapel Hill, NC, as well


as the State Dem Party AND the Executive Committe of the State Dem Party.
Now, if we could just get that resolution to the floor of the NC Legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Got a question
In my small burg we will be having our first meeting re: impeachment of Bush-Cheney come Monday. The focus is to be on some ideas as per mock trial or having speakers who go on at length about the lengthy crimes committed by the current Bush administration for the ultimate presentation on the 28th.

Now our local comgresscritter has been outspoken against the Cheney gang from the start and very recently spoke again in public in a most spirited fashion, right after a constitutional lawyer who was calling for impeachment, and enumerated the list of crimes and openly stated that BushCo "likely" committed impeachable offenses but fell short of actually calling for impeachment. In fact states that it would be bad political strategy.

With that let me ask: Is there some obligation for a House member to BEGIN impeachment proceedings if they believe that the Constitution has been violated? Do they not have a sworn duty to protect the Constitution? If they see that the Constitution has been "possibly" endangered by these "possibly" impeachable actions where are the pressure points to place upon the Rep to uphold their sworn duty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ok, I will ask it again.
In David's last post he said this:

"This is, of course, also the story of the online Howard Dean Campaign and its lamentable results for the leadership of the Democratic Party. There are to this day people walking the face of the earth who believe Howard Dean opposes the war. And hardly a day goes by that someone doesn't complain to me about not including Moveon in a coalition for impeachment. The delusion - the inclination to believe the media rather than your own eyes - can be so intense that people will swear up and down that they've received pro-impeachment Emails from Moveon. The time it takes to explain why that is impossible and then to deal with the subsequent urges to lobby Moveon to actually become what the television said it was is probably surpassed in its power to drain useful energy only by the premature election season."

I asked who he spoke for in damning Dean and MoveOn, I asked twice and never got an answer.

May I also ask if it is PDA you speak for in condemning good Dems like Pelosi and Dean, and also MoveOn, or is it yourself or DSM. You seem to be speaking for a group.

I wonder why you don't answer which "lamentable" results Dean had for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey, here's Nancy doing her job. Wonderful account from Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC