|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
carpe diem (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 12:45 AM Original message |
Why the delay in releasing Obama's fundraising numbers? Is it because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. Dunno, my guess is he's raised a shitload of $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Andrea Mitchell just reported on Hardball that Obama may have raised $25M for the primary alone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. They are all over the place. Haven't you seen them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Link please? Nothing in papers today on Obama.com. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:12 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Then it sounds like to me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carpe diem (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I thought that was an estimate / projected fugure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. No way.... seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Check your facts. Edwards had 40,000 contributors Link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. A delay already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
8. I wonder if there is a reason for those who have released them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Rupert Murdoch donated a big chunka change to Clinton's campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Link to donation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. It was for her NY Senate run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wesin04 (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 05:56 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Going to the highest bidder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I agree with both response posts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
10. dude, he's "articulate' and "well-groomed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obamian (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. Some speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. The FEC numbers are the ones they don't want explored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. I think it's because he has poor organization and they're having to audit the numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. And Mitt Romney's are out now because?????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Waiting gives him a day to have the media focused on him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-02-07 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. hopefully because there isn't a number big enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC