Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Fear 2008 MELTDOWN (Politico)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yebrent Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:25 PM
Original message
Republicans Fear 2008 MELTDOWN (Politico)

You know Republicans are in serious trouble in 2008 when you read an article like THIS from the right leaning Politico.

Some choice bits:

"Bush's low approval ratings are an illustration. Some experienced GOP campaign strategists believe that there is virtually no chance that a Republican can succeed Bush if his approval ratings remain mired in the 30s. The Democratic strategy of investigating administration scandals and policy blunders is calculated to achieve exactly that goal -- and the burgeoning controversy over the firings of eight U.S. attorneys has given Democrats in Congress yet another inviting target."

"Already, there are some troubling trends on the money front, according to GOP fundraisers and Federal Election Commission documents. First, corporate PACs gave almost 60 percent of their money to Democrats in the first two months this year, a striking shift away from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Political Money Line. Republicans snagged about two-thirds of corporate PAC money over the previous four years."

"To underscore how tough things are for the GOP, Bill Pascoe, a Chicago-based Republican consultant with Urquhart Media, said "there are Republican consultants scouting state legislators for 2014. That's how far the long-range planning is going. Why 2014? Because that would be the second midterm of a Democratic president."

"Republicans are also having trouble landing the strongest candidates in key House races. In Florida's 22nd Congressional District, for instance, the top three prospects have all refused overtures to challenge first-term Rep. Ron Klein, a top GOP target. In New York's 19th District, the GOP is having trouble luring a blue-chip candidate to challenge Rep. John Hall in the Republican-tilting district."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I view Politico to be in
the same class as "Newsmax"......a right-wing, red herring news journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't understand why a site founded by...
a guy that wrote for the New Republic and a guy who wrote The Survivor (about as middle-of-the-road a treatment of Bill Clinton as you're likely to find) is compared to Drudge and Newsmax. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They didn't do such a hot job predicting Edwards'
campaign status re: Elizabeth's cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. errors and bias are two different things. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This thread from the other day helped me process
my gut feelings with Politico.....I became suspicious over the past 2-3 weeks. Thus I placed them into the do not read catagory for now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x527736
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why not just go to politico and judge for yourself?
Instead of relying on gut feelings to not read news sources? I mean, criminey, dare I say who that sounds like? :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well, I just triaged the option...
I already was feeling misque's from Politico via access/links at DU and multiple media sources such as TV and radio. Then the thread I linked just reinforced what I was sensing. I see no reason to seek Politico out as a news source at this time....I'll still keep an eye on them but they are very low on my list.....maybe if I am bored, I'll go check them out directly but I'm not impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yebrent Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I referred to it as "right leaning" in the OP
I'm not sure why you would reply to a post just to say that you won't read it. weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'd disagree that it's even right-leaning.
So far, I've been relatively impressed with the politco's lack of bias. Yeah, it's screwed up a couple of times, and it's fallen for conventional wisdom more than a few times, but I don't find it to be mostly left- or right-leaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yebrent Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I haven't read enough from Politico
The only reason I used "right leaning" is because I read the media matters story on the Drudge connection.

The article I posted seems totally unbiased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Time magazine says the republicans will stay in the white house
they say the country wants a republican to stay in the white house. They think republicans can handle the situation because they are mavericks. Say WHAT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Jeez, it's all STRATEGY to them
how to grab and keep the top of the shitpile. It's never about governing and it is never about the fact that they've been doing the WRONG THING by becoming more and more corrupt with every election cycle.

This is why they're getting more and more unpopular. People are sick to death of having those boys blow sunshine up their asses on religious issues while sucking as much money out of them as they can.

When their flunkies say things like "all justice is political," take them at their word. Everything is politics to them and they have absolutely no concept of what justice and fairness really mean.

Enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC