Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Behold the Rhetoric Changes: Voter Fraud now ELECTION FRAUD to White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:06 PM
Original message
Behold the Rhetoric Changes: Voter Fraud now ELECTION FRAUD to White House
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 11:42 PM by Land Shark
Voter Fraud happens, but is relatively rare because it only typically gains you one lousy vote, its a felony and leaves evidence. (dead voters, double voting, illegal registrations). When the US Attorney scandal broke, it was clear that Republicans and the White House were pushing for frivolous voter fraud charges mostly against Democrats that study after study shows are rare to nonexistent.

On the other hand, ELECTION FRAUD is the proper name when insiders (typically) get involved, it is a lot more interesting since they have the capability, often, to deliver the desired result: THE ELECTION RESULT. Particularly in this day and age when the first counts announced on election night for both optical scan systems and touch screen systems feature trade secret software and their completely secret counts (even elections officials don't know the counts or have access to the internal workings of the software) the magic numbers are just taken on faith. THis ought to be a form of Election Fraud all by itself, not showing your work. I used to get in trouble for that in high school math class, and election math is only 1 plus 1 equals 2. Any election insider could easily sell the election. Luckily controlling all or part of the the world's greatest country is of so little attraction that nobody would be tempted to cheat on computers where it would leave essentially no evidence, right?

But anyway, the rhetoric is now changing and the Bush Administration and others are referring to ELECTION FRAUD and trying to steer clear of VOTER FRAUD. The Missouri Star gives some good examples, note how Dems and the press use "voter fraud" but Rove and Bush use "election fraud":

WASHINGTON - Under President Bush, the Justice Department has backed laws that narrow minority voting rights and pressed U.S. attorneys to investigate voter fraud - policies that critics say have been intended to suppress Democratic votes. Bush, his deputy chief of staff, Karl Rove, and other Republican political advisers have highlighted voting rights issues and what Rove has called the "growing problem" of election fraud by Democrats since Bush took power in the tumultuous election of 2000, a race ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Bush administration's emphasis on voter fraud is drawing scrutiny from the Democratic Congress, which has begun investigating the firings of eight U.S. attorneys - two of whom say that their ousters may have been prompted by the Bush administration's dissatisfaction with their investigations of alleged Democratic voter fraud.

Bush has said he's heard complaints from Republicans about some U.S. attorneys' "lack of vigorous prosecution of election fraud cases," and administration e-mails have shown that Rove and other White House officials were involved in the dismissals and in selecting a Rove aide to replace one of the U.S. attorneys. Nonetheless, Bush has refused to permit congressional investigators to question Rove and others under oath.

{...}

Frank DiMarino, a former federal prosecutor who served six U.S. attorneys in Florida and Georgia during an 18-year Justice Department career, said that too much emphasis on voter fraud investigations "smacks of trying to use prosecutorial power to investigate and potentially indict political enemies." http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/16963344.htm



You heard it here first: Bush complains about lack of vigorous prosecution of ELECTION FRAUD cases!

The voter fraud pressure is the scandal, the lack of vigorous election fraud investigation is a REAL ISSUE. In fact, following up on several convictions for felonies for rigging the presidential recount in Ohio in 2004, an Ohio criminal prosecutor is looking deeper. http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2007/2506



Let's not forget, Bush wants to be "fully cooperative" with and vigorously prosecute "election fraud"!
===============

ANNOUNCING: THE NEW ELECTIONS ORGANIZATION: PSEPHOS Psephos Means Elections (in Greek) www.psephos-us.com (under construction).

PSEPHOS will engage on behalf of democracy in Deliberation first, Education Second, and Litigation, if the first two fail.



"The compromise of the voting right IS the violation of the voting right."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. OK, Psephology is the study of elections, but Psephos does mean Pebble, not elections....
I stand corrected, and yet knew that... hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kudos!
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 12:32 AM by smalll
So at last, all those angry, hair-splitting threads over at the Election Reform forum have finally forced the White House to come to heel and start using the proper term! What power, what justice, what a Victory! Give yourselves a pat on the back!
:applause::applause::patriot::applause::party::patriot::crazy::patriot::party::applause::patriot::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nah, WH still using the term (subjectively) wrong
election fraud: more likely kind focusing on insiders who have ability to deliver desired result, the ELECTION RESULT

voter fraudL single vote felonies that are as relatively rare as they are felonious.

Reframing White Housers are trying to Use "election fraud" to refer to "voter fraud"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They have always used this tactic to control the words in their favor.
They now need election fraud to attach to Democrats and effect what pops up on the search engines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. interesting, never thought of it, but would search engines be an ancillary factor
or a controlling factor? My guess would be ancillary. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. ancillary.... but it is definitely a way they force confusion.
For example - they knew Kerry planned to run for president, so in 2002 they ginned up war crimes charges for Bob Kerrey when he was in Vietnam.

Once you understand the way those vipers think, it's easier to see what their intentions are, especially when a story comes out of nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. ok, i agree ancillary, thanks for making your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. morning kick, after all GWB wanting vigorous ELECTION FRAUD prosecution is NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanks for this
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are most welcome AtomicKitten, and luvthename! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC