Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Pet Spending Projects"... this is what would be getting vetoed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:52 PM
Original message
"Pet Spending Projects"... this is what would be getting vetoed
The $124 billion emergency war bill the committee approved on Friday contains a wide range of funding for health care programs in the Defense Department and Veterans Affairs departments. Funding for DOD health care programs covered by the bill includes:

$450 million for post-traumatic stress disorder/counseling.
$450 million for traumatic brain injury care and research.
$730 million to prevent health care fee increases for U.S. troops.
$20 million to address the problems at Walter Reed.
$14.8 million for burn care.
The bill increased funding for the VA's health care programs by $1.7 billion, including:


$550 million to address the maintenance backlog at VA health care facilities to prevent situations similar to those at Walter Reed.
$250 million for medical administration.
$229 million for treatment of a increased pool of veterans.
$100 million to allow the VA to contract with private mental health care providers.
$62 million to speed claims processing for returning veterans.


This is the extra money that the Dems "slipped into this bill for their pet spending projects", according to the Screeching Chimp. If he vetoes this bill, this should be hung around his neck for the rest of his sorry life.

Support the troops..... indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. All this pork barrel really disgusts me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. can you believe the utter contempt of these dems? wanting to take care
of the troops when they come home injured. What audacity! :sarcasm: <<---- as if it's needed..

I can just see the chimp now, looking at a soldier in a wheel chair missing a leg and an arm and saying "hey soldier, the motto says " some gave ALL..... didn't say nuffin about just givin' PART... now get back to EYErack and fight like a man!" ... heh heh heh smirk smirk smirk heh heh

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's not the stuff they're referring to....n/t
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Be fair. It also includes farm subsidies and aid for Katrina victims
I'm not saying either of these things are bad -- far from it -- but it's not as though the bill is completely free of non-defense items.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. you're right... I should have "this is *some* of what will be vetoed.."
I honestly haven't read the other particulars. This is just what I gleaned from an article I read the other day listing these provisions, and they kinda stuck with me because I thought it was good thing to do.

:hi:

Ghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. That bastard
They claim we don't support the troops, and then he wants to veto this??? What a piece of work. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. 14 Dems voted against the bill
.... because they no longer wish to fund the war. However, the upside of the bill is that it does give a definite endpoint of the war albeit 9/08 is a long way off, it raises the minimum wage, provides monies for vets, and provides relief for Katrina victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shrub* called these "pork barrel spending" programs
....well it is Dimson who is "porking" the American military fighting men and women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC