Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vilsack to endorse Clinton for president

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:37 AM
Original message
Vilsack to endorse Clinton for president
DES MOINES, Iowa - Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a major political coup, captured the endorsement of former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who recently abandoned his own presidential bid, officials told The Associated Press on Friday.

Vilsack and his wife, Christie, planned to make the endorsement on Monday when the New York senator will be in the state, the officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the planned formal statement next week.

Clinton spokesman Mark Daley would not confirm Vilsack's endorsement, but did say the campaign had a major announcement planned for Monday in Des Moines.

Iowa is the first test in the presidential primary with caucuses on Jan. 14, 2008, and backing from both Vilsacks is certain to boost the Democratic front-runner. A win in Iowa provides critical momentum, especially with a spate of primaries and caucuses early in the nomination calendar.

In 2004, Christie Vilsack backed Democratic Sen. John Kerry, support that helped the eventual nominee win the Iowa caucuses.

Vilsack, who served two terms as Iowa governor, launched his own bid for president in November, but dropped out of the race on Feb. 23. He said his campaign could not raise enough money to continue.

Vilsack had been courted by most of the major Democratic contenders for the presidential nomination and once he left the race, he became a likely prospect as a vice presidential running mate.

Vilsack, 56, left office in January and traveled to early voting states, but he attracted neither the attention nor the campaign cash of his top-tier rivals — Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) and John Edwards. He even faced obstacles in his home state.

Once he quit the race, Vilsack fielded calls from most of the Democrats running for president, including Clinton and Obama. He also heard from former President Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore and former Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, who is working for Clinton.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070323/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_vilsack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for her. He's a possible VP choice IMO if Clinton gets the nomination.
This was predictable, however!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Knuckling under this fast won't make him VP; he'll get (or pick) HHS or Ag at best.
All he really bought was some speaking time at the convention--so long as her people are running the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. I don't believe thats what I said. He's been a possible VP choice for a while.
Long before he dropped out even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, He Did So Well In 2004
yep, sure did. Vilsack helped pick our nominee. Kerry owes him a great debt.

Vilsack sure knows how to pick winners

:sarcasm:

OK - Don't get all defensive about Kerry. I have no doubt he would have made a GREAT President, but he didn't make a good candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ignorance is bliss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. To clarify
His wife, who holds significant influence in Iowa, did endorse Kerry. Vilsack was officially neutral, but it can be surmised that he was for Kerry.

Endorsements don't seem to matter that much. When Sen. Tom Harkin endorsed Dean, many people thought it sealed the deal for Dean. But in reality, it didn't mean very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. His wife didn't do so til a few days before primary - veterans, firefighters, and students
won the day for Kerry - they were the ones who worked hard for him that last month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Actually, Vilsack did not endorse Kerry until AFTER Iowa.
As a governor, he remained neutral. As for his wife, she only endorsed Kerry a few days before the primary, nothing to do with this.

There is no surprise in this endorsement. Vilsack was until a few weeks the head of the DLC, and Hillary Clinton is basically the only remaining DLC candidate. Vilsack endorsing somebody else is what would have been amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. How could Kerry not make a good candidate? He WON the election!
It was another case of Grand Theft by Republican Operatives and the most important reason for supporting Hillary in the Primarys.
I want assurance we will have a Demo President in 09.' If they try stealing the next election from the Clintons, there will be HELL to Pay! And that, my friend, you can take to the bank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. AMEN. Kerry won, just like Gore. In any event, if Hillary gets the nomination...she wins. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Gore won, Kerry lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Katz...you've got to catch up..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Living under a rock I see?!? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. You're right. Gore won, got screwed by the SC. Kerry lost, got beat by an imbecile
Worst campaign I've ever seen. John Kerry is a fine senator and a horrible campaigner. Stale as a month old loaf of bread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Your opinions about his campaign are to be respected and valued. But you can't deny he won.
The FACTS suggest otherwise, my friend!!

We won in 2000 and in 2004, and Bush walked away with the WH. It's bullshit, and it's why we need to make sure the voting process is functioning FINE in 2008 and that WE win the election in 2008. President Edwards, President Obama, President Clinton, President Clark, President Richardson and so on....they all sound better than President McCain or President Giuliani :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Okay, I agree
but I'm not telling which of those sentences I agree with. }(

they all sound better than President McCain or President Giuliani


Getting stuck with either of those two rats would be the most evil joke that destiny could play on us, especially Giuliani. Both would suck, but Giuliani would be just as arrogant and smug an asshole as Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. Yeah sure Kerry won. Right. That's why he's sitting in the WH.
How could Kerry not make a good candidate?


Surely you jest! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Gore won too, and he's not sitting in the WH.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 07:39 PM by Kerry2008
With Kerry's new book out, it seems both are passionately speaking out about the enviromental crisis. So while neither is in the WH, both voices are strong in this environmental fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Kerry's got a new book out? Is it a cook book by any chance?
"How to Get Your Goose Cooked in the Middle of a Campaign" by John Kerry

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Nope, my friends. It's a great book, and very important and useful.
I suggest all Americans who care about the environment, and our future read it!!

No laughing matter here. Much like Gore, Kerry realizes the crisis of global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. In all seriousness, yes
it would be a good idea for everyone to read it. The environment is my number one priority, and yes, Kerry has been one of its strongest advocates over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Why? Can you name the Dem who the press WOULD HAVE covered honestly?
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 03:17 PM by blm
Can you name the Dem who would have had a different DNC in place that HAD secured the election process for the four years before election day?

Can you name the Dem who would have HAD the entire party supporting HIS position on terror and military issues instead of Bush's in 2003-2004?

Can you name the Dem who had a left media in place that wouldn't have gotten their asses kicked by the RW media machine day in and day out?

Kerry won - the RNC stole it for Bush.

And Vilsack didn't win Iowa for Kerry - firefighters and veterans and college students did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent choice!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. SO???
Vilsack was a very minor candidate from a very small state with no chance to win. He was coming in FOURTH in his own state of Iowa where he was the former governor. If he can't have any influence there, just where do you think his "endorsement" is going to matter?

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. He is the former Gov. of an early primary state, and a former 08' candidate.
His endorsement matters. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:52 AM
Original message
Not really...
Again if you can't be relevant in your own home state, where else will you be relevant? Just ANSWER the question, don't make meaningless assertions.

Vilsack dropped out for the obvious reason that he is irrelevant to the voters and can't raise any money because of it.

The real Democratic endorsements that will matter in order of importance will be:

1) Al Gore
2) John Kerry
3) Wesley Clark

I'm assuming that Kerry will eventually endorse Edwards, that Gore will sit on his hands for a long time and then possibly endorse Hillary unless he jumps in himself, and I don't know what Clark will do.

Hillary obviously already has the endorsement of Bill so that one has already been decided but it is also discounted because they are husband and wife.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Clark is probably going to run. And I don't think Kerry will endorse Edwards. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't know who Kerry will endorse, but I sure hope Clark and Gore run
I am also glad that Kucinich is there

I want ALL the candidates feet held to the fire so we know EXACTLY where they stand on Iraq

I am tired of the nonspecific issues where they stand

The only thing I know for sure is they all believe that:

The sky is blue
Rain is wet
war is bad
peace is good

TELL ME WHAT YOU WILL DO ABOUT IRAQ? Tell me if you will open talks with ANYONE, or selective choose who you will talk with?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. I don't.
I hope Clark OR Gore runs. I'm not sure the ecosystem of the primaries can handle both of them, even if "events" remove Mr Edwards from the final contention--as I fear they may still do.

(Forgive me for being ghoulish, but these matters must be taken into account).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. Yeah him and his 5 remaining supporters.
Big deal.

I'm in Iowa and I know for a fact that THIS IS NO BIG DEAL.

Vilsack is irrelevant in Iowa.

Our current Governor's wife is a big John Edwards supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm Shocked.
Shocked.

I need to sit down for a spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. LOL
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 11:10 AM by PassingFair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Changing the conversation
LOL! I'll give it to Hillary! That team knows how to subtly change the topic without anyone noticing.

From what I understand, Edwards has invested two years in Iowa and has worked hard to win it. After the presser yesterday, he likely strengthened it from not just the best person for the job politically, but personally as well.

The timing of this is no accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. That may be, but why not Bill Richardson, Dodd, perhaps Gore or Clark
This election is a long way off, and personally I am not impressed by Clinton at all. She has been all over the board on Iraq, and that is a VERY REAL PROBLEM for me



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes, but you've been paying attention
This endorsement may not get extensive, continued national coverage but it's going to be headlines in IA where the people who cast votes are. It's a smooth move on the part of the Clinton team.

BTW, I'm still undecided too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The MSM knows exactly what they want to cover, and what they don't want to cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Let see.
Vilsack is the former president of the DLC and Clinton was part of the leadership of the DLC at the same time. I am not sure why somebody would be surprised. A lot of people have said that Vilsack was a stalking horse for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. what I thought as well - they're both DLCers
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 01:00 PM by xxqqqzme
no big shocker here.

'A major political coup'?? That's quite over the top!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. If the Dem machinery believe Clinton is the best the Dems have to offer that is sad
Especially since her position in the last six years on Iraq was pathetic

but I am sure we will make every possible excuse for the WORST MISTAKE IN AMERICAN FORIEGN POLICY IN THE LAST 100 years

Lets support someone who was Wrong on Iraq, Wrong on the Bankrupcy bill, and continues to say we will need to keep some troops in Iraq for some time

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. A call from Al Gore
Veddy interesting if he called on his own behalf or somebody else's - either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. how annoying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. Totally shocking and unexpected.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Who cares he's a NON-ISSUE he was loosing badly in Iowa when he was in the race....
the other candidates will get endorsements also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. And the nation let's out a giant,"Who?"
Most endorsements are like ties in a hockey game,and this one is no exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well he's responsible for Kerry well that's lovely. Should of been edwards that year really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Yes, and it would have been with just a couple more days.
And we would have had the White House back.

Vilsack wants a VP nod.

A Clinton/Vilsack ticket? A one-way ticket to another republican White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
50. Responsible for Kerry? What a joke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'll be endorsing Obama in the next few days
Just wait for the official press conference next week. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. Be sure and post the link on DU.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Duh
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. Hillary, Richardson, Biden and Vilsack - DLC peas in a pod. This is hardly news. Nor will it be news
when Biden drops out shortly and endorses Hillary or when Richardson drops out after that and also endorses Hillary.

While Vilsack predictably endorsed Hillary, it would be more interesting to see who Vilsack's campaign staff is now supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
37. Did she say "Thank you, Mr Secretary?"
She kicked his ass (campaign donation-wise) and made him like it. Don't ever underestimate this woman. She's powerful.

But she's still not gonna win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. With that kind of poor judgment, no wonder he had so little support. nt
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 06:25 PM by Clarkie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
46. That's got to be worth... dozens of votes!

SO long, Tom. We hardly knew ye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
54. Fuck Vilsack
warmongerer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
55. Why, what a surprise
NOT.

DLC, DLC, DLC, DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC