Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP: Gullible Old Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:46 AM
Original message
GOP: Gullible Old Party

The notorious “e-mail forward” has become a staple in the rightwing’s arsenal of weapons deployed in political warfare. No longer is it necessary to spend millions of dollars investigating a president for imagined and invented charges or sending out party soldiers to Sunday talk shows to repeat exaggerated and usually false offenses by Democrats. Republicans have a more effective way of throwing tofu (that is, artificial red meat) to their waiting masses.

Did you get that e-mail saying Bill Clinton didn’t do anything to the terrorists after the first World Trade Towers bombing in 1993? The “facts” in it were completely fabricated. Did your husband forward you the piece about Hillary Clinton helping free two Black Panthers accused of torturing and murdering Alex Rackley? It, too, never happened.

The problem with political urban myths is that, unlike other legends that evolve over time, these are wholly manufactured to fool a gullible audience. In most cases, that audience is rank-and-file Republican voters. They helped spread the “Al Gore said he invented the internet” story via e-mail even after it became common knowledge Wired Magazine misquoted the Vice President’s interview on CNN’s Late Edition With Wolf Blitzer. And just in case you’re wondering, Col. Oliver North NEVER testified before Sen. Al Gore about the threat of Osama bin Laden.

The last presidential election cycle was particularly brutal - from a ridiculously obvious faked picture of Sen. John Kerry ☼ with Jane Fonda to the dubious claims from the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” that called into question Kerry’s military service to his country. It seems conservative voters are eager to have their disdain for Democrats validated and Republican operatives are more than willing to fill that market demand with tall tales of intrique, treason, and murder.

What can we expect from the upcoming election? We’ve already seen a wild, yet false, accusation that Barack Obama is a radical muslim and he attended a “radical muslim religious school” in Indonesia. Similarly, just this week conservative media outlets like Drudge Report and FOX News took a speech by Hillary Clinton in Selma, Alabama, in which she quoted an old hymn written in a southern dialect, and tried to make it sound as though she was pandering to southern voters by imitating their accent. Haven’t heard that one yet? It will probably appear in your inbox by lunch time.

In the arena of politics, there are enough real issues to keep us all entertained without falling for every story that passes through your e-mail. Even if it concerns a candidate you deplore, wanting it to be true will not make it true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. This tecnique of instilling doubt, repeating an untruth to the point it is considered truth
or partial truth, enough to raise doubts about the character of the target, needs to be pointed out everytime they do it.

Over the past couple of weeks, I have noticed another technique: issue baiting based on false pretexts to begin with. The argument gets framed, someone gets suckered into it from a defensive posture, and it is off to the races, people wasting valuable time and energy on phony issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah... I agree with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC