Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Need W.Va., Ark. to Swing Back Their Way 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:34 PM
Original message
Democrats Need W.Va., Ark. to Swing Back Their Way 2008
West Virginia and Arkansas may be the most unnatural states to have twice backed President Bush.

And Democrats are working to bring those two traditionally Democratic states back into the fold.

With strong labor unions a backbone of the political culture, West Virginia had, until recently, been a Democratic bastion in presidential politics. West Virginia was one of only six states to stick with President Jimmy Carter in his 1980 landslide loss to Ronald Reagan, and voters there also backed Michael Dukakis in his 1988 thumping at the hands of George H.W. Bush.

Arkansas is a similarly ancestrally Democratic state that voted for the Republican presidential nominee in 2000 and 2004. Though Arkansas has trended Republican in recent decades like its Southern neighbors, the majority of elected officials are still Democrats.

West Virginia, with its five electoral votes, and Arkansas, with its six, represent the sort of states a Democratic candidate would need to win for the party to regain the White House. As Democratic strategists survey the national political landscape more than 20 months before the November 2008 election, West Virginia and Arkansas are at the top of states that must be pried away from Republicans.

The key to victory there, analysts suggest, is in trotting out a candidate who would appeal to those states' largely rural constituencies, while maintaining support from Democratic coastal elites. That's the sort of political balancing act President Bill Clinton executed in his 1992 and 1996 victories, which included support from several Southern states.

-snip


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2923.html






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. with Dean's 50 state and the Dems working on the west, it would be more of a nice
but not neccessary. We have the west folding into our tent and that will help us pick up where we fall in the south. Plus we have VA pulling more blue. A few others are going purple now. We are expanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uh, you might want to look closer at the 50 state strategy
Edited on Tue Feb-27-07 11:49 PM by NV1962
The West isn't "folding" just by itself, it's simply starting to respond to the 50 state strategy. And that means: fighting in each and every one of the 50 states, paying attention to the local play books, and stop pouring the one-size-fits-all goo over the insulted heads of an entire nation.

States like AR and WV are within grasp. But it has to be earned. And it's not going to happen when the battle tactics are dictated from places remote from the battle front.

It's not an "infection" of sorts - it's a hard-fought war, won state by state, county by county, block by block.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is good advice
"Be who you are, because they're going to find out sooner or later."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. While WV is trending Repub and AR is steady Repub, VA is trending Dem
State / 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004
West Virginia: 12d, 7d, 6d, 7r, 10r
Arkansas / 6r, 12d, 8d, 6r, 7r (Clinton caused the big spikes in 92 and 96)
Virginia / 13r, 10r, 10r, 9r, 6r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy from nj Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. WVA and AR are important states for the Dems
I think they have a good chance to take VA also. It all depends on the candidate. I think it will be a long slow process to take the border states, but we need to keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC