|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:39 PM Original message |
Supreme Court Justice Gore anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Correction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Have we ever had a non-lawyer SC appointment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I don't think it's required.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. You're right. It's not required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dragonlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Not required, but close to it in practice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Here's the information. My first post was wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StatGirl (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'd prefer Eliot Spitzer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Eliot Spitzer would be and excellent choice n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StatGirl (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Plus, he's young! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. He would rise to the occasion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StatGirl (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-21-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. But he'd be too old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC