Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Justice Gore anyone?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Justice Gore anyone?
Man wouldn't that be the best. He'd be a perfect choice for some soon to be elected democratic president. It's a nice dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Correction.
President Gore anyone?

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Have we ever had a non-lawyer SC appointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think it's required....
...that one be a lawyer to be a USSC justice, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You're right. It's not required.
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 06:00 PM by NaturalHigh
In fact, I'm pretty sure we've had Supreme Court justices who weren't lawyers. It's rare, though.

Edit: I was wrong. Apparently, we've never had a justice who wasn't a lawyer, but we've had some who didn't actually graduate from a law school.

Although the Supreme Court of the United States has never had a non-lawyer as a Justice, there are a number of state courts with non-lawyers on the bench.

Levi Woodbury, named to the Supreme Court by President Polk in 1851, was the first Justice to have formally attended law school<1>. Prior to this, all Justices had gotten their training through apprenticeships, similar to the British system. The apprentice system was in common use through the first century of the Supreme Court’s history, and James Byrnes in 1941<2> was the last Supreme Court Justice trained through apprenticeship.


http://www.constitutioncenter.org/education/ForEducators/SupremeCourtConfirmationFAQ.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not required, but close to it in practice
I think the only kind of nonlawyer who could be confirmed would be a recognized constitutional law scholar of the political scientist type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Here's the information. My first post was wrong.
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 06:20 PM by SharonAnn
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/education/ForEducators/SupremeCourtConfirmationFAQ.shtml#q2

Has someone who is not a lawyer ever served on the Supreme Court Bench?

Although the Supreme Court of the United States has never had a non-lawyer as a Justice, there are a number of state courts with non-lawyers on the bench.

Levi Woodbury, named to the Supreme Court by President Polk in 1851, was the first Justice to have formally attended law school<1>. Prior to this, all Justices had gotten their training through apprenticeships, similar to the British system. The apprentice system was in common use through the first century of the Supreme Court’s history, and James Byrnes in 1941<2> was the last Supreme Court Justice trained through apprenticeship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatGirl Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd prefer Eliot Spitzer
Gore has great talent, but the Supreme Court wouldn't be his best environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Eliot Spitzer would be and excellent choice n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatGirl Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Plus, he's young! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8.  He would rise to the occasion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatGirl Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. But he'd be too old
After all, he'll be 68 after his second presidential term expires. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC