|
The problem is, an impeachment is a long and difficult process under the best of circumstances and these are not the best of circumstances. This country is in bad shape, and action must be taken now. An impeachment process would at best dilute those efforts, at worst so consume the attention of the Congress and the nation that little or no progress can be made.
So, I would (in my ideal world) act to contain Bush's exercise of power and make forward progress on those issues while the clock runs to 2008.
However, as I said these are not the best of circumstances. Given his deeply flawed character, it is unlikely Bush will accept congresional constraints on his power. This will motivate him to force a constitutional crisis, potentially far more dangerous than experienced during the Nixon years. Impeachment proceedings will likely be involved in Congress' response. This will be madness, and detrimental to the national interest, and I hope we come out the end with the Consitution intact.
I guess what I'm saying is impeachment could well be harmful but is likely, given Bush's near sociopathic nature, to be unavoidable. And perhaps that is the right thing, after all. The rotten tooth must be pulled before it poisons the entire body and all that.
|