Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Nedheads" rally in CT...including professor who did the "takeover" of Lieberman's party.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:46 PM
Original message
"Nedheads" rally in CT...including professor who did the "takeover" of Lieberman's party.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 01:17 PM by madfloridian
Lamont meets with 300 of his beloved "Nedheads". Great article.

http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2007/01/nedheads_bash_b.php

“I know Bush would not have mentioned me in his speech,” Ned Lamont told his beloved Nedheads – more than 300 of whom gathered for a celebratory reunion bash at Bar, where the bloggers and "netroots" activists renewed their determination to fight for change not just in Iraq, but on health care here at home.

...."Although the reunion for the activists, volunteers, bloggers, and supporters of Lamont's 2006 senatorial bid was not planned for the night after President Bush's speech announcing an escalation of the U.S. military presence in Iraq, outrage at the news found its way into Lamont’s heartfelt thanks to his supporters. In his address Wednesday night, Bush singled out Lieberman as a supporter of his Iraq strategy.

“I was running against two guys who said that, yes, the troops might begin coming home in '07 or '08,” he said to a crowd made happy by plentiful pizza, beer, and wine. “But I didn’t know they meant 3008!”


And among the guest list which included many bloggers was the newly self-appointed chairman of the Connecticut for Lieberman party.

John Orman, the affable professor of political science at Fairfield University and political analyst, was having a good time and proud to point out that he had run against Joe Lieberman years before Ned Lamont did. “Ned ran the dream campaign I would have liked to run, only he was much better.” As the new chairman of the Connecticut for Lieberman Party (!), Orman (who staged a takeover when the senator had stopped paying attention to the vehicle he created to run against Lamont after losing the Democratic primary), said that he could simply not allow himself to be photographed with Ned, a member of a different party.



And for those who don't know the story of the takeover by Orman of Joe's party, here is some background.

http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-rgreen0105.artjan05,0,5420007.column?coll=hc-utility-local




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. That guy looks like the "before" pic in a Crest White Strips commercial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Never mind.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 01:01 PM by madfloridian
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I do judge people when they are in the public eye. Not to be vicious, but because
image is everything to people who don't pay attention. Image can make a difference between victory and defeat. Unfortunately for this guy, though, Lieberman is now calling himself something other than a CFL'er. He bills himself as a Democratic/Independent. And if he tries to run again six years from now, he'll probably file as that, as the last article notes:

Orman, meanwhile, promises that his party will be "dedicated to people who want to keep Joe Lieberman accountable."

Now there's a difficult task. It's much easier to start a phony political party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Orman's teeth are the least important thing in this article. Go deeper.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 01:18 PM by madfloridian
Thanks for setting such a nice tone.

I took the picture out of the post....what you have done is set up a distraction from the issue that is real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, I did go deeper. And concluded that it doesn't matter, because
Holy Joe will simply run under a different banner, if he does run again in 12. CFL is a dead duck already...because Joe is D/I now, not CFL. All the posturing and wound-licking in the world won't change that.

And if it weren't for the fact that Bush is about as popular as a ten day old skunk carcass at a lawn wedding, Joe would probably have jumped to the GOP by now. He'll continue to caucus with the Dems, only because they can do MORE for him. He's an ass, but he isn't stupid.

Look, I'm sorry if you don't like my attitude. I think the professor might be a nice fellow, but he's tilting at a windmill here....as the quote I extrapolated from the article notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It is not meant to be that serious a matter.
The professor is not stupid, nor am I. I did not take it as a serious matter that would really change anything. I did not expect anyone else to either.

I think it is funny. I think it embarrassed Lieberman a little if anything can.

I took the picture out. Your point was made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I wonder if anything can embarrass Lieberman. He has "his" seat back, for the next six years.
I rather suspect his attitude is "Who cares what the voters think?" And he probably figures if he brings home just enough bacon to the state (dietary laws notwithstanding) through his contacts with corporate GOP thugs, they'll return him to "his" seat, if he wants it, again. He's not lacking in hubris, certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Coverup wing of the party needed Joe to protect Bushinc on Iraq and Katrina.
A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He said no investigation of Katrina, and no "digging around" in 2003 pre war.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 01:11 PM by madfloridian
I am so angry about Joe's statement on Katrina. I am going to call some congress people on that. To think Joe could say that and get away with it is beyond believable. And what he said about Iraq pre-war is worse.

Lieberman doesn't want to to see us "digging around anymore for who did what in 2003"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It annoys me that Obama is saying he doesn't want Iraq war investigations, either
and makes certain to say so on national shows like Larry King both times he popped up over the last month and has done the same on other shows. So, WHO of the inner DC elite is he trying to signal and please with those remarks?

Seems to me that any real antiwar Dem would be working to assure that the leadup to that war is exposed so it could not happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Thankfully, Obama isn't chairperson of anything
So it's not up to him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. good on lamont -- that's how keep a grassroots effort alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. There was a Lamont grassroots get together at Christmas also. Video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Statement by Lamont about Iraq.
“I think we should take the troops out of Baghdad immediately,” he said. “Shia and Sunni agree on only one thing, and that is that it’s OK to kill Americans. Bush doesn’t listen to his generals, to his commission, or to Maliki, who doesn’t want us, or to the votes of the American people. So, now, I think it’s time for Americans to stand up,” he said.

Then a voice called out from the attentive crowd: “We did, Ned, with you,” followed by rousing applause.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Diary and video link about Dr. Orman at Daily Kos.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/20/194938/622

Video at Blip TV.
http://blip.tv/file/135190


This is sort of a joke that isn't really a joke. It might work in a way, and it is annoying Joe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. Applauding the Nedheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC