Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman is a treasonous, rat bastard.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:29 PM
Original message
Lieberman is a treasonous, rat bastard.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Sen._Lieberman_backs_Bush_troop_surge_0110.html

<snip>
"I applaud the President for rejecting the fatalism of failure and pursuing a new course to achieve success in Iraq. There is no more difficult decision that a President can make than to send our nation’s bravest soldiers and patriots into harm’s way. Yet, no objective is more worthy in defending America’s vital national security interests than aiding a struggling democracy and supporting brave moderates who are in a life and death struggle against totalitarian extremists supported by Al Qaeda and Iran.

Our troops have sacrificed much and now more will be asked of them to defend our nation. They fight in a just, noble and moral cause against the forces of terrorism, and their sacrifices will make America and the world more secure. I want our troops to return home as soon as possible – after we allow, enable and support them in accomplishing their mission in Iraq in finishing this fight.

I know there are deep differences of opinion about what the President has proposed tonight. In the coming days and weeks, we should undertake respectful debate and deliberation over this new plan. But, let us also remember that excessive partisan division and rancor at home only weakens our will to prevail in this war. I am particularly pleased that the President has taken the important and necessary step of creating a bi-partisan Consultative Group consisting of representatives and leaders of the Executive and Legislative branches to address issues related to the war against global terrorism.

At the moment, we and our Iraqi allies are not winning in Iraq and the American people are understandably frustrated by the miscalculations, the lack of progress, and the daily scenes of violence and casualties. But, make no mistake - defeat in Iraq would result in a moral and strategic setback in our global struggle against Islamist extremists who seek to strike our interests and our homeland.

Success is attainable in Iraq, and tonight the President has offered a comprehensive program to chart a new course in both winning the military struggle to establish order and in achieving the political and economic objectives to build a more promising future for Iraqis. However, no progress is possible unless we restore order, particularly in Baghdad.

Tonight, the President did not take the easy path, but he took the correct and courageous course. We are engaged in a world-wide struggle against Islamist extremism, and Iraq is now the central front. It is a dangerous illusion to believe that we can depart Iraq and the inevitable killing fields and terrorist violence will not follow us in retreat - even to our own shores. That is why it is right and imperative that we recommit ourselves to success in Iraq. Weakness only emboldens our enemy, but united resolution will make our nation safer for generations to come."
<snip>

I despise this man. Completely. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. And he lied to the voters of Conn.
by pretending he wanted to drawn down forces. SOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
61. Don't blame us Dems
he was elected by the Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. Any quotes? I recall him saying he was for withdrawing troops..
funny how he seems to forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Um...
<snip>
rejecting fatalism of failure and pursuing a new course to achieve success in Iraq.
<snip>

So the answer is "Victory" withought victory being defined...how do we neutur Lieberman..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Joe Lieberman's more shameful to our party than that mad hatter - Zell Miller
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A Pleasure To Be In Agreement With You, Ma'am
The reptile is a disgrace to the good name of snakes everywhere....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thank you kindly Sir.
:hi: A good turn of events now and then. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. i'd be glad...
to place myself squarely in the camp between short-n-fiery and the good magistrate.

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. You're a member of the Connecticut for Lieberman Party?
Because joe isn't a member of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
49. I have to agree!
Crazy he may have been, but at lezt Zell never pretended to be anything besides what he was. I'd rather have an honest but batshit politician than a lying and batshit one.

Of course I'd rather get hit in the mouth with a brick-in-a-sock than either of those, yes...

In joes case, I have to wonder. It could be that he sincerrely thinks this. How old is he? His facial expressiosn are starting to look very vacant and disjointed. It could very well be that he's simply losing touch with reality, in a very real way. In which case, I feel for him.. .and want him to go home for a good, soothing retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
74. Zell Miller was a good Democratic governor who

did good things for Georgia, encouraged Bill Clinton to run for president, introduced him to Carville and Begala (who had run Zell's campaign), made a great speech at the convention that nominated Clinton the first time. He got weird after he was appointed to the Senate.

I know people think he's a DINO but my impression is that he still believes in most of the Democratic Party's principles. He still considers himself a Democrat and has said he always will. He was a Marine so it's not too unusual that he has the "support the CINC unquestioningly" mentality.

At least Zell didn't switch to the GOP and run for re-election, as he could well have done. He'd have probably been re-elected on either party's ticket because he has a long history in Georgia politics. I'm glad he chose to retire, though he was replaced by a Republican.

Holy Joe, OTOH, wouldn't take "No" for an answer from the Dems in Connecticut and has talked about going over to the GOP. Not to mention his role in robbing Al Gore of the presidency he won.

If only HE would retire. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Would You Care To Clarify That Comment, Sir?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Excuse me?
Would you have the guts to clarify that remark, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who the hell does he represent?
Not the people of CT, certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Loserman drank the Kool-Aid a long time ago.
His only good to us now and the CT voters that were foolish enough to vote for him is he is the role model for:

Being a coward and hypocrite - abandoned his principals, abandoned his party, abandoned the TRUTH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hell, he's more Republican than the Republicans themselves.
Even Sam Brownback opposes escalation, for Pete's sake. I hope the Repubs who voted Lieberman in are happy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
78. Joe Lieberman is a neocon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've decided to call him Holy War Joe
An upgrade of the old Holy Joe nickname.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not Bad, Sir
A decent piece of agit-prop....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Just a minor adjustment...
Holy War Judas. He has betrayed his party. He has betrayed his country. He is a full-on traitor.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. Joe-das Iscariot?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #63
80. I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. Isn't "JIHAD JOE" a better fit?
I sure think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
50. Jihad Joe Lieberman - I like the name. Thank God he's not a democrat
I'm glad he caucused with us, but I'm also glad there is not a "D" after his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
54. You are correct. I tip my hat - you've gone one better.
Jihad Joe, rhymes with J.I. Joe. Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush mentioned him BY NAME as giving him 'good advice' ...
during the last part of his feces flinging speech.

I'm betting that Joe is going to be tapped for VP when Cheney steps down due to 'health issues'.
I mean, how much more 'cooperative' and 'bi-partisan' can you get?
Lieberman IS a Democrat, right? EXTREME:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. And Rell can appt. a Repuke to take LIEberman's Senate
seat. So, its a win-win for the pukes.
I hope all the morans in CT who voted for him are regretting it now.

BTW, LIEberman's arch enemy Prof. Orman has seized contrl of the CT for LIEbeman Party. Membership is open to all critics of LIEberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
72. Most of the "morans" who voted for Joe were actually republican morons.
And some older Democratic voters that thought they could still trust old Joe.

He shoved it up those Democrat's butts, and is doing Bush's bidding for the war. He is the lowest form of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Foolishness only emboldens our enemies, Joe.
And you're the biggest fool of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. During the speech the chimp used LIEberman....
by name as part of a bi-partisan group to advise on the progress of the war or some bullshit like that. All I know is I heard his name and I blew a gasket!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Me, too.
It felt like a cold, slap in the face. I feel nothing but contempt for that treasonous, rat bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. The two parties being
the Rethuglicans and Ol' Connecticut for Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
53. "bi-partisan group"
If a Democrat joins, it'll be tri-partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Don't be surprised if he announces for President in '08
Lieberman's got his Senate Seat locked for six years. Supporting Bush's war gambit is all upside, especially given that Lieberman's support of the war all along. Like Bush, Lieberman has nothing to lose and everything to gain by driving the country into more war. If the "surge" fails (no timeframe for that decision, I guess), then Lieberman's blame level remains unchanged at "high." Bush goes from political oblivion to political oblivion -- no change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. Go for it Lieberman
The smackdown, and it will be a smackdown, will be worth the watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #43
79. Don't be surprise when Lieberman is going to break your bubble by voting against Dems....
It is the reason why he was so heavily financially backed by the repukes...
Joe baby will be -- is the next Zel Miller for those aware of who he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. there are others who also think joe is-
a "rat" bastard".......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obviously, unholy Joe is lying through his teeth because he is
serving war profiteers.

Nobody is fool enough to believe the unmitigated bullshit that Joe wrote there, not even Joe himself.

Lieberman is definitely working for the dark side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Mister Lieberman has a job to do.
It's why he recieved those Publican votes. He is doing his job.

If anyone has any poo, fling it now. Someone this corrupt has got to have left some evidence somewhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. No kidding.
We can't dig deep enough, IMO. This piece of filth has left piles of dirt...no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Byron Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. I didn't like him in 2000. I don't like him today. Free-trade neocon Dem n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
44. Yeah, I voted for Gore in 2000
but I had to hold my nose for two reasons, one was Holy Joe and the other one was holier than thou Tipper. Tipper seems to have eased up and Lieberman isn't a Democrat anymore. I could vote for Gore a lot more easily the next time around. I hated Lieberman before it was fashionable to hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. I'm with tavalon 100%. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
28. Comment
Lieberman no longer has enough credibility as a Democrat to give Bush bipartisan cover. Democratic voters rejected him and Mr. Bush's war in last year's primary and he went on to hold on to his Senate seat with Republican votes and White House money. He was the de facto Republican candidate.

Lieberman, your name is Wormtongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. I don't know. I think there is something going on we don't know about.
Everything is getting just too bizarre.

Bush and his cronies have to have some reason for this unbelievable behavior.

I, for one, am prepared to be surprised when the true story finally comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. * is the antichrist...
and he's assembling all his dark angels?

how about...

* is actually an EBE from the planetary system Idiotora and his mission is to wreck this planet for humankind... so that his reptilian species (that feeds on radioactive material) can colonize the Earth.

I'm sure there's plenty of good reasons for their behavior...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. Just think...hopefully just two more years
of having to really deal with him. Hopefully the Dems can pick up a few more seats in the Senate in '08 (which should be possible), and the party can ignore him and he can be free to switch over and caucus with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
32. Don Imus blasted Sen. Chris Dodd for not supporting Joe over Ned Lamont.
I wonder what the I-man will have to say about his beloved Joe now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Imus is an old has been imo. And I am old. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
75. Better to be old than an old has-been, though,

isn't it? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. I wonder what Lieberman's approval ratings in CT are. Would be interesting to know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
34. Obviously the voters in CT like this dude.
since he beat Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Maybe the Repugs, maybe the Aipac Establishment $ together w/
the NeoCons, but no, not your average Nutmegger (Connecitcutter?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Yea, Lieberman won with the endorsement of the White House and the Connecticut GOP
He got the institutional support of the Republican Party without having to be a Republican. Had CT Republicans actually voted for Schlesinger, Lamont would've won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. You do realize he lost to Lamont in the primaries and
that he only wont he general election with Republican support? The Repugs threw their candidate under the bus and actively supported this liar. Or did you miss that whole story?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
58. Ofcourse he lost democratic voters...what I said was CT voters
which includes all parties, liked him better than Lamont.
Which also means Lieberman is now an independent senator.
Which also means we need him badly to be in the majority
on every friggin vote in senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
52. well he failed to get a majority of CT votes
he got 49.7% of the vote. Yes it beat Lamont by 10% but it's not a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. yes, the voter turnout was pathetic as usual is this country. Even the Iraqi's
have a better turnout than us and they face bombs and guns.
Shame on our voters for being sloths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. Its not that simple
He narrowly beat Lamont in the general mostly because the Repugs did not back their Candidate Alan Schlesinger. Once it came out that ALan had some old gambling problem history, they dropped him like a hot potato. The WH put its support behind LIEberman who used KKKarl Rovian campagin tactics including a $375,000 "Petty Cash" slush fund in his PAC that he did not have to give a full accounting of. Nope, I'm not over my anger yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Is'nt it a shame that voters can be manipulated so easily..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Yes, it certainly is.
They were afraid to take a chance on Lamont who the media portrayed as a "Greenwich millionaire" giving the impression that he was buying a Senate seat. As a matter of fact, our state legislative Dem. leader, Amman, accused him of that in exactly those words in an editorial. Anyone who wanted to looks closer at him discovered that he had a good background having grown up in a family involved in public service over several generations. But the lazybrained just ate up what the MSM fed them.
It is very discouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
35. ugly stuff.
i suppose he got that from a white house speechwriter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. A true TRB!
Back in '02 I decided to call all pnac, neo-con, rong wing persons in this corrupt regime rat bastards, but it became too confusing - there were soooo many.

but I like TRB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. He's looking to be on the R ticket in '08, I'm sure of it.
McLieberCain 2008

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. We can only hope
Between The Kiss and The Hug, they are sunk already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
46. How fucking stupid can you get?
Yes, extremists are supported by Al Qaeda and Iran, but Al Qaeda is supporting the Sunnis, and Iran is supporting the Shi'ites. And if you haven't noticed, Sen. Dumbfuck, the Sunnis and Shi'ites are FIGHTING EACH OTHER!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
47. Did anyone else notice this?
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 03:43 AM by Ghost in the Machine
From the 3rd paragraph in the OP:

I know there are deep differences of opinion about what the President has proposed tonight. In the coming days and weeks, we should undertake respectful debate and deliberation over this new plan. But, let us also remember that excessive partisan division and rancor at home only weakens our will to prevail in this war. I am particularly pleased that the President has taken the important and necessary step of creating a bi-partisan Consultative Group consisting of representatives and leaders of the Executive and Legislative branches to address issues related to the war against global terrorism.{emphasis mine}


So now it's a war on Global Terrorism? Does this mean that the War Criminal can now start a new war anywhere on the globe that he perceives as a threat?

This is the first time I've seen it called a Global War and it just kinda jumped out at me. Maybe it's old news and I missed it? :shrug:

edited: because my keyboard is tired right now and can't spell correctly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. I've heard "global war on terror" many, many times from W and Co. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
48. There went my coffee
When * announced that he would have a bipartisan advisory group including *Lieberman*! (Wasn't that the *only* name he mentioned? Sheesh.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
51. Does he still claim to be a Democrat?
Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. He calls himself an "Independant-Democrat" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. In respect of his heritage...
he's a SCHMUCK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
68. Thank you Lamont
Thank you Mr. Lamont for exorcising this treasonous demon from our party. At least democrats can hold their heads up now and disassociate themselves from this evil bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. True. I frequently think at least they can't say he represents Democrats like
they used to all the time - "Democrats are split", blah, blah.

He doesn't represent us anymore. Thank Goodness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
70. I think you are being soooo unfair.
Treasonous rat bastards everywhere have just taken major offense at being lumped in with that rancid piece of crap Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
73. Actually Lieberman was born in the year of the horse, arch enemy of the Rat
Gore is a Rat though, being born in '48.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Odd, considering that Joe is a rat. . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
77. It's obvious, Joe Lieberman is the replacement for Zel Miller
We may get to understand his Democrat support when Kennedy-Plan for up and down vote on going to Iraq will happen. - There are more republicans who stand against Bush's surge bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NovaNardis Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
81. He's not a rat bastard...
He's "principled".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Lamont voters are not going to go away
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 02:21 AM by monarch
Keep up on CT politics with http://ctbob.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Ok. A "principled" rat bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC