Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That's it, boys and girls - the 'K Street Project' is dead...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:25 AM
Original message
That's it, boys and girls - the 'K Street Project' is dead...
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 10:28 AM by Richardo
(cross-post from GD)

Tell Norquist and Delay that the 110th Congress http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010514/dreyfuss">"drowned it in a bathtub" by a 430-1* vote when they passed the new ethics rules in H Res 6 (Title II).

A sweet day for America, gang. :patriot:

Section 202, baby ---> http://www.rules.house.gov/110/text/110_Hres6.pdf


On edit:
* http://www.house.gov/burton/">Dan Burton - IN (R)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. What about the loopholes?
I heard there were some pretty big loopholes. Has anyone enumerated them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Section 202 is short and sweet - I don't see a loophole:
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 10:33 AM by Richardo
SEC. 202. ENDING THE KSTREET PROJECT.
Rule XXIII is amended by redesignating clause 14 as clause 15, and by inserting after clause 13
the following new clause:

“14. A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not, with the intent to influence on the
basis of partisan political affiliation an employment decision or employment practice of any private
entity—
“(a) take or withhold, or offer or threaten to take or withhold, an official act; or
“(b) influence, or offer or threaten to influence, the official act of another.”


That pretty much dismantles it, as far as I can tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You might be right with regards the K street project
I guess the loophole I heard of was more involving gift giving

Do you have a link handy for the full text of the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks much! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC