Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Official: Troop Escalation ‘More Of A Political Decision Than A Military One’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:29 AM
Original message
Administration Official: Troop Escalation ‘More Of A Political Decision Than A Military One’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/03/escalation-political-decision/

MIKLASZEWSKI: Good evening, Brian. Administration officials told us today that President Bush has now all but decided to surge those additional troops into Baghdad to try to control over the violence there and only then could they accelerate the turnover of territory to Iraqi security forces. Fact is they’re not up to the task yet. The plan would also throw more U.S. money at Iraq for reconstruction and a jobs program. Interestingly enough, one administration official admitted to us today that this surge option is more of a political decision than a military one because the American people have run out of patience and President Bush is running out of time to achieve some kind of success in Iraq. While this plan will clearly draw some stiff opposition on Capitol Hill, the president is expected to announce it a week from today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the only 'political' decision they can make risks the lives of
thousands more? Aren't there any thinking caps at the wh? There's no way for the decider to decide on a different course of action that doesn't draw blood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. The good old way of
fighting fire with fire always works. :sarcasm:
Whatever happened to all that money from the oil that was going to make this war pay for itself. Can we recover some of that from Halliburton so we can pay for a jobs program for the Iraqi's. Oh!! well even if we did we will still get Halliburton to manage the program for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. What's news here is that an administration official admitted it.
It's pretty clear Junior is doing this in a desperate attempt to show he was right all along. He's willing to throw more of other peoples' lives and other peoples' money at this nightmare and hope it might work. And if Congress blocks this surge maneuver as they should, well then I guess the Iraq disaster was not his fault. See, he could have 'won' if those America-hating liberals in Congress would have let him execute his brilliant strategy. Turd Blossom is deeply involved in this for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. How does Congress "block" the escalation?
I'm not sure how Congress has any power at the moment to block a military maneuver. When a funding bill comes up the Dems could conceivably act then but Bu$h has all the authority he needs at the moment to send the troops and get money later as I see it. The "brilliant strategy" is going to happen regardless, my only concern is what manufactured incident he will use to ensure his escalation becomes permanent.

and an FYI, Dems have also vowed not to de-fund the military as a means of ending the debacle in Iraq. They've already taken that off the table (along with impeachment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He doesn't need an incident to make the escallation permanent.
If you don't agree to a timetable, then 'never' is part of the scenario for withdrawal of the troops who are there now. Same thing for the 'surge' troops. That's the way Junior's been playing it so far. The neocons have a deliberate intention that no significant troop withdrawals will occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. George Bush is a murderer. Putting political motives ahead of the safety
of our troops and the security of our country.

He should be removed from office ASAP! And that can start TOMORROW!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Are Americans going to stand for this?
Sending troops to die for BushPolitics?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've thought it was a purely political decision all along...
For different reasons, though -- I think Bush is doing it to create a dilemma for the Democrats in the next election. If they support it, they will be going against the wishes of the voters -- people voted for the Democrats because they want to stop the war, not escalate it. On the other hand, if they oppose the "troop surge" and withhold funding for it, the Republicons can criticize them for not supporting our troops, and will try to pin the failure of Iraq on the Democrats because they opposed Bush's "plan for victory."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They all are
Find the DiIlulio letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC