Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Last Year’s Coal Mine Deaths Increase 210 Percent Over 2005

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 08:41 PM
Original message
Last Year’s Coal Mine Deaths Increase 210 Percent Over 2005

http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/01/02/last-year%e2%80%99s-coal-mine-deaths-increase-210-percent-over-2005/

Last Year’s Coal Mine Deaths Increase 210 Percent Over 2005

by Mike Hall, Jan 2, 2007

The 12 coal miners killed in a Jan. 2, 2006 explosion at the Sago Mine in West Virginia were the first to die. On Dec. 17, John Elliot, killed in a roof collapse at the Dana Co.’s Prime No. 1 Mine near Maidsville, W.Va., was the 47th and last coal miner killed on the job last year, the deadliest year in the nation’s coal mines since 1996.

The death toll is a 210 percent increase over 2005, when 22 coal miners died on the job.

The Mine Workers union (UMWA) and other coal safety advocates fear the trend could continue due to:

* The huge demand for coal and its profits.
* The Bush administration’s lax enforcement record since taking over the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) in 2001.
* A workforce that is expected to grow younger and more inexperienced in the coming years.

Former MSHA administrator Davitt McAteer tells USA Today:

The big push is to get black stuff out of the ground. You neglect infrastructure, maintenance, education and (safety law) compliance. It begins to catch up with you.

Another former top MSHA official, Tony Oppegard, who served during the Clinton administration, is more blunt. He tells the newspaper that the Bush administration’s mine safety enforcement practices are to blame for the extraordinary raise in fatalities.

The policies of the last few years are taking root.

Faced with the rising death toll, Congress toughened some mine safety laws in 2006 and the new Democratic-controlled Congress is expected further strengthen safety rules.

New MSHA administrator Richard Stickler promises a new emphasis on safety enforcement—and after allowing its mine inspection force drop from 634 inspectors in 1997 to 584 in 2005, MSHA is adding more inspectors. Safety advocates are taking a wait-and-see attitude on MSHA’s vows to crack down on safety violators.

Stickler, a former coal company executive, failed to win Senate approval because of concerns about the safety records at the mines he ran from 1989 to 1996, where the injury rate was double the national average. Bush was forced to use a backdoor recess appointment to place him the post.

As oil prices remain high, so will the demand for coal. The push for even more production in mines that are already operating at record levels and making massive profits. The Energy Department reports that coal production from January to September last year was a nine-month record.

Peabody, the nation’s largest coal company, made $426 million on sales of $3.8 billion during those nine months, according to USA Today, compared with the $260 million in sales it earned in 2005. Peabody is vigorously fighting a drive by its non-union miners to win a voice at work with the UMWA and the strong safety rights a UMWA contract requires.

As the demand for coal continues, so does the need for more miners. Meanwhile, many of the nation’s current coal miners are nearing retirement age. Those miners, says UMWA spokesman Phil Smith:

Will be replaced by folks who don’t have a lot of experience underground.

Working underground in a coal mine is dangerous without experience, strong safety laws and tough enforcement of these laws by federal and state officials. And 2006 proved that.



E-Mail This Article | Digg it





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shortcake Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is truly a bipartisan issue.
Ignored by both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC