The Senate voted for it, voted to reconsider, and then voted to uphold it. It advances to the next session of the legislature and gets a lot closer to getting on the 2008 ballot. We gotta do everything we can to stop this.
Though he is against it and essentially told the members of the legislature to adjourn. I wish they'd all have just not shown up to kill it. But no, in short I don't believe he has any power here.
That law has just made it easier for heteros in stable marriages to possibly question their sexual preferences and maybe wanna break up and "go gay".
The legislature sure better hurry! Oh my God! Another day passes and another hetero might just go to the "other side"! Protect marriage! Protect heterosexuality! Protect America!
5. What if the voters overwhelming allow it to stand?
Wouldn't that be a good thing? As long as it is by legislative fiat the opponents will always play the "let the people choose" card. I'm willing to bet that the good people of Massachusetts will vote to confer the right of marriage to all of their citizens.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.