|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:35 AM Original message |
Why is Pelosi saying impeachment is "off the table?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. She won't even be Speaker for weeks here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JavDom (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. Because a Dick is worse than a Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Hi JavDom!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JavDom (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 02:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. Because it sounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. impeachment starts in the House judicial committee. She is saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Waiting a decent interval until facts established by investigation put it on the table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I think there is some concern about the time it will take to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. I agree that there are other good reasons for her not to be for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
O.M.B.inOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Yes, let there be investigations of war-justifying lies and of both Pres. elections first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. Because she doesn't want to look like the rabid Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I think this is correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. i wouldn't jump to that conclusion.. i think an "INVESTIGATION" is on the table.. dont put the cart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnlal (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. What investigation do we need? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:10 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Nonetheless, it needs to get into the official record. We're all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Uhhhhm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnlal (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 03:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
10. we are not just out for revenge and payback, we want Justice 'First', and it is goin to be easy.!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastic cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. Because she knows that impeachment is organic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. Some good answers here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. Good answers, yall. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. because verdicts follow trials, not the other way around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
18. because it's on the 'desk'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
21. She was set up in an interview before ... given a question they would not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
22. Because Pelosi is a smart politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
23. Because it's a useless gesture that will only tick the public off n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 11:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Until the public starts to demand it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. Because we want to win in 08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spaceman Spiff (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. First you would need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
El Fuego (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
31. Because it would look like a power grab since she will be third in line for the presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
32. Invading Canada is still on the table as far as I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC