Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry smacks down McCain for criticism of Clinton's North Korea policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:02 PM
Original message
Kerry smacks down McCain for criticism of Clinton's North Korea policy
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 03:05 PM by ProSense

McCain: Clinton's North Korea policy 'a failure'

POSTED: 3:46 p.m. EDT, October 10, 2006

SOUTHFIELD, Michigan (AP) -- Republican Sen. John McCain on Tuesday accused former President Clinton, the husband of his potential 2008 White House rival, of failing to act in the 1990s to stop North Korea from developing nuclear weapons.

"I would remind Senator Clinton and other Democrats critical of the Bush administration's policies that the framework agreement her husband's administration negotiated was a failure," McCain said at a news conference after a campaign appearance for Republican Senate candidate Mike Bouchard.

"The Koreans received millions and millions in energy assistance. They've diverted millions of dollars of food assistance to their military," he said.

Snip...

McCain's criticism elicited a strong response from Democratic Sen. John Kerry, the 2004 presidential nominee and a potential 2008 candidate.

"He must be trying to burnish his credentials for the nomination process," said Kerry, who labeled McCain's comments "flat politics and incorrect."

"The truth is the Clinton administration knew full well they didn't have a perfect agreement. But at least they were talking. At least we had inspectors going in and we knew where the rods were. This way, we don't know where the rods are. The rods are gone. There are no inspectors. Ask any American which way is better," Kerry said.

The Massachusetts senator made the remarks in Nevada during a campaign appearance with Elizabeth Carter, wife of Democratic Senate candidate Jack Carter.

more...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good - keep pointing out the lies of that hypocrite - McCain deserves it
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 03:25 PM by blm
for his cravenness these past 6 years.

Defend Clinton for the good. Urge truth when Clinton goes wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's nice to see Kerry have Clinton's back and respond so quickly
I wish other Democrats had been that fast and furious in '04 to defend Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I wish Clinton had - - even if Clinton had just defended himself in 2004
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 03:23 PM by blm
it could have helped the entire Dem party.

Clinton should have done that within months of 9-11 and before the 2002 election instead of leaving the "Clinton did nothing - Dems are weak on terror" memes out there to solidify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Bravo for Kerry...This is just the way it SHOULD BE ALL the time..
The rebuttals to Republican LIES have to come out fast and furiously.
In the past, this is where the Dems failed to unify..I hope they've changed that
mentality and "It's ONE FOR ALL...and ALL FOR ONE!" (The Three Musketeers motto)Forever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Exactly! Kerry knows something about being a LOYAL Dem for REAL.
They weren't there for him in '04. Dean was and a few others were, but I remember seeing quite a few Dems on television discussing Kerry with what could hardly be called enthusiastic support. To say they damned him with faint praise while sticking the knife in his back would be an understatement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
41. Ed Shultz was slamming dems for not attacking on this--leave it to kerry
to be the first to step up tot he plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. Give em hell Big Eddie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. bush didn't want inspectors in NK or Iraq
and they were doing a great job. I guess you'd have to be a religiously insane dumbfuck bush supporter to think otherwise. Just send someone else's kid over there to die for us so we can stay here, barbecue hot dogs, watch football games and continue to be dumbfuck bush supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton SOMETHIN' is better than bushco NOTHIN'...........
negotiations and diplomacy are done by smart political leaders; idiots saber rattle and start preemptive wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rec'd! Not a day goes by that Kerry doesn't have something to
say about the sorry state of current affairs. Where is everyone else? What are they saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. I'm surprised that Dems are so silent lately. Kerry has been fierce
fighting for other Democrats. He's not thinking of them as competition: he's thinking of what is best for the party and therefore the country.

Who speaks out for Kerry? Who speaks out to remind the world that Kerry was right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was inevitable they would blame the Clenis
Nuclear proliferation has increased exponentially on Junior's watch, and snaps to JK for pointing that out. He must get tired of correcting their BS because there is much of it to be had, but I am glad he is diligent in doing so. It's almost like dealing with short attention span 2-year-olds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whatever integrity McCain might have claimed...
...as a result of his military service was long ago devoured by his money-grubbing involvement as one of the Keating Five and by his egomaniacal ambition for the White House. Fuck the old whore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Agreed on McCain. He's a miserable old whore allright.
Did you see Friday's Bill Maher show? He really dissed McCain good for that photo hugging *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes! Go after their lies.
They started the Clinton bullsh*t yesterday, trying to deflect blame away from Bush. Clinton attempted to work with NK and keep his eye on him. Clinton isn't perfect, but he always keep an eye on issues and he tried. Bush just ignored it all. Good for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Always first to defend Clinton when they lie about him.
Too bad Clinton fails so often to reciprocate and that is HIS character flaw. And I will bet it even saddens him when he actually thinks about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Graybeard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Keep chipping away at the McCain pedestal...
..and he will collapse. Opportunism and hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hi, Graybeard. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. You just put an image in my head of McCain as that statue of Saddam
falling in Iraq. McCain's face forever etched on that falling statue: I love it!

Welcome! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good job Senator
McCain doesn't need facts apparently. He has learned from BushCo well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. when a Senator confronts a puny lil RW Cronie--what became of Senator
McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well all right!
Glad to see Kerry isn't going to let McCain get away with this maverick tough guy nonsense. He's nothing but a rubberstamp and all this bully talk today absolutely was 'burnishing his credentials". No more playing politics with security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. .
Has it always been that way? The Repubs are in charge, they have solid majorities in the Senate and the House, that fool Monkeyboy has been President for 6 years.
But whenever something bad happens, they never ever fail to look for excuses by blaming the Democratic Party. Just once I'd like to see them acting instead of shifting the blame. You are in charge, take responsibility, do something right and act like adults for a change!

Who cares what Clinton did? They had 6 years and the best they could do was making them a part of the axis of evil? Great job and thanks for nothing! It's not hard for Clinton to do better than that.

Uh so Clinton's plan was bad? Stfu. If that's what you think, there was enough time to do it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. OH FER GOD SAKES - CLINTON HASNT BEEN PREZ IN SIX -COUNT EM -6 YEARS
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 03:51 PM by Kashka-Kat
GET OVER IT ALREADY

EVEN ASSUMING FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT CLINTON SCREWED UP.. THE QUESTION IS WHAT ARE yOU! YOU! YOU! YOU! GOING TO DO ABOUT IT IN THE HERE & NOW -

IN THIS TIME-SPACE CONTINUUM WE ARE NOT ABLE TO GO BACKWARDS WE CAN ONLY GO FORWARD

SORRY FOR SCREAMING IVE JUST BEEN DRIVEN STARK RAVING MAD!!! ENOUGH ENOUGH ENOUGH!

Can you imagine John Kennedy during the cuban missle crisis whining about how Eisenhower screwed up relations with cuba & Russia instead of doing something about fixing the problem in the here and now. What the fricken heck has happened to us as a nation that we have to have these imbeciles running the show???????????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The Republicans have learned something
how people view the past has a big effect on how they vote in the present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. well obviously to some people-- but for others of us it just sounds for
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 04:09 PM by Kashka-Kat
all the world like a bunch of whining six year olds ...

actually I read something recently about how the tide really is turning, &surveys are showing that people are starting to view the Clinton years w/ rose colored nostalgia... as a fun-loving time of peace and prosperity. Enough time has passed and enough death & corruption has transpired to put the past in a different perspective.

Humans - gotta love em. We are a fickle species.

Hmmm maybe that changing view of the past bodes well for the next elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. indeed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. All that mediawhoring for Bush may have done some good - it was TOO MUCH
and TOO much coverage of Bush let the public see how one dimensional he really is. And all the propping up by the corpmedia cannot bring back ANY trust like that once it is broken.

It sickened me how media covered every little thing Bush did, smoothing over the lies and masking the evil with praise and distraction. They ignored the most serious times for the Democrats - any Democrat.

But all that familiarity with Bush and his style and his mannerisms has now turned to something else for many Americans - revulsion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. heh heh
Understand your frustration :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. heh heh
Understand your frustration :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Ask any American which way is better," My only quarrel with how Kerry
framed it is I would have stuck "thinking" in front of American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
46. Insulting many of the voters would help how?
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 10:35 AM by karynnj
I see your frustration, but Kerry's comment here hits because there is no hyperbole or overt nastiness here. This is a case where Kerry's career long reputation as a gentleman helps. This is a strong attack on McCain's supperficial statesmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. He must be trying to burnish his credentials for the nomination process
Ha ha, great quote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm just glad someone is finally going after McCain's flaunted INTEGRITY
that we all know hasn't existed in over twenty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Videos: McCain blame Clinton; Bush says, "We will not tolerate nukular..."
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 05:38 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
39. Speaking of "nucular,"...
...a couple weeks ago, I had the opportunity to ask one of the neo-con warmongers why it is that none of them can pronounce the fucking word correctly. Granted, Patrick Clawson is not one of the rabid cons, and he's smart enough to realize that Iraq is now a disaster because of the Bush mis-Administration, but it was still gratifying to let him know that anyone who cannot properly say "new clear" has no intellectual credibility whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Good syllabic representation! LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. Did any Kerry supporters watch CBS news ?
Katie Couric flashing JK's "reporting for duty" from the '04 Convention.

When can we get past this !?! It's just so freakin' heartbreaking :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Catchawave what was the context for that?
I think ours answer to your rhetorical question differs. For you, I would presume to catch, with an election victory in 2008 for the Democrat. For, me an election victory for John Kerry, who is so ready to be President.

Nice that he was out there with a great response before either of the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. "Reporting for Duty" will haunt him in '08 too :(
And I don't think anyone on the Dem team wants to revisit that moment. Ever. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think the GOP's attempt to tie HRC to Bill will backfire. Big time.
The wording of the statement is odd: "I would remind Senator Clinton and other Democrats critical of the Bush administration's policies that the framework agreement her husband's administration negotiated was a failure." (bold mine)

This has nothing whatsoever to do with North Korea and everything to do with the GOP posturing for '08. What losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiouxJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
43. Agreed. All we have to do is remind them that if Shrub had spent more time
on the Korea situation and less time on vacation, this might have been avoided. Where was Shrub during Katrina? On vacation. He's always on vacation while storms are brewing. He's the "asleep at the wheel" president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Blaming Clinton for Bush's failures with North Korea is another low
reached by McCain. Is there anyone left with any illusions about McCain's journey into the Dark Side.

Kerry has taken the lead in attacking the rightwing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Don't you know?
Clinton is repsonsible for EVERYTHING bad that has ever happened to this country in the last 40 years....yes even during the Reagan era....


:eyes: idiots....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #32
45. It is interesting that Kerry had one of the first and best responses
to this garbage. The RW has been spewing the blame Clinton on NK for over a week as they threathened to do this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. Go senator go!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
40. I REALLY don't see the Corp Media giving EQUAL time to Kerry's statement
It's all about McCain and a drop to Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. That's what I was going to say.
mccain is given air time on lots (if not all) of the networks to spew his crap, but I haven't seen any Democrat given equal time.

It's that frickin' librul media again! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Imagine what the world would look like if we actually HAD a liberal media.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Looking at the NYT and a few others, that seems to be the case
Aol and AP did a good job in including Kerry's comments.

Most of the others want the Hillary/McCain fight meme here - even though the statement was from a Hillary spokesperson. Her husband's statement is the more relevant to use. (Though Kerry's is better probably as it is easier to defend others)

In the NYT they took McCain, Hillary, McCaskill and Cantwells's opponent. The frame was partisan sniping. Kerry's didn't fit the reporter'e theme as it was a pretty straight forward, non-defensive defense and calling McCain's comment what they were. (In fact, mentioning Kerry questions his theme - their is sniping because the press rewards that versus statemanshiplike behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Dems Barely Ever Get Equal Time in the Media
the corpo pricks control the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC