Few things are funnier than listening to right wingers insist that because

[beaconess]

some of pages may have been just over the age of consent, there's no harm, no foul and and any further discussion of this is clear evidence that Democrats are behind this whole thing.

Of course, these are the same people who wrung their hands about how Bill Clinton took advantage of that poor innocent little 24-year-old girl.

And these are the same people who thought it OUTRAGEOUS that anyone would suggest that the fact that the poor innocent little 24-year old girl flashed her drawers at the president and bragged about her "presidential kneepads" could lead one to believe that she bore some responsibility for the situation (or, at the very least, wasn't a hapless victim).

And these are the same people who, whenever confronted with the fact that Bill Clinton's behavior, while inappropriate, was not illegal, shot back, "STOP hiding behind technicalities!!! So what if what he didn't actually break a law. His behavior was WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!"

And these are the same people who wept and moaned about "How do we explain this to the children?!"

This is too precious.

[SeattleVet]

1. I love the freepazoid message thread where they are whining

about how it's all OK since Foley resigned and is no longer holding that office, so why are the mean old Dems still picking on him...3 messages before the start in on blaming Clinton for everything.

[WePurrsevere]

2. It's pure unadulterated & very obvious hypocrisy. n/t

[vixengrl]

3. Democrats are *so* behind this thing--

(get this) that they planted pages who led this poor grown responsible man astray as far back as *1997* with the hopes of influencing the 2006 election cycle, they intentionally allowed the GOP to stay in the majority in the House to make sure that it was Hastert--who you know, loves to conspire with liberals, made sure nothing was done when it all got to his attention--and we also arranged for a GOP-er to release the info to the amazingly flagrant example of the liberal media--ABC, who recently also released the far too soft-focus (:sarcasm:) Path to 9-11, and of course, at least one of the pages is totally pretending to be a serious conservative.

Dastardly--huh?

And even more :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:, and did I mention, :sarcasm: ?