Hastert is the third Repug Speaker in sucession to have possible ethics problems. Those Repugs are really on a bad run...
Here's an interesting blast from the past:
------------------
Getting the House in OrderMichael J. Ring
American politicians have not always been the wisest, the most benevolent, or the most caring lot, but the 105th Congress set new lows in idiocy and spitefulness.
As that sorry body expires this week and the 106th Congress convenes in Washington, Americans can only hope that the leadership of this Congress will be more sensible and tolerant than the extremists of the last. As House Republicans hold a majority of only six, the need for conciliation and cooperation is high and the potential for gridlock frighteningly real.
Unfortunately, the Speaker's chair is surrounded by a power vacuum, a vortex which in the past two months alone has destroyed a speaker and a would-be speaker.
The House is left in chaos, and a review of the circumstances surrounding the ousters of Newt Gingrich and Robert Livingston offer little hope that a bipartisan resolution will be reached quickly.
After masterminding the Republican Revolution of 1994, Gingrich proved his skill at winning elections. But he was a better campaigner than governor, and his tenure was marred by partisan rancor and turmoil. The Georgia Republican took the fall for the Democratic congressional gains in the midterm election.
Interestingly, Gingrich's resignation was not prompted by the complaints of Democrats or moderate Republicans. It was a revolt among the Bible-thumping firebrands of the extreme right that sealed Gingrich's fate. Immediately after an election in which the American people told conservatives they were banging their drum too loudly, the right sought to up the volume. The American people had tired of the conservative crusade, yet the extremists in Congress sought to knight a new leader.
Emerging from the dust was Robert Livingston, an affable Louisiana Republican with a conservative voting record but without Gingrich's acerbic personality. Livingston appeared to be a candidate who could unite the House after the tumultuous Gingrich tenure.
Last month, Livingston admitted to an affair. At the time of admission, he still intended to seek the speaker's post. On the morning of Clinton's impeachment, however, Livingston withdrew from the speaker's race and announced he would resign his seat in Congress.Livingston's resignation was denounced by politicians left and right, who called for an end to "the politics of personal destruction." But Livingston resigned for a reason, and word in Washington is he wished to spare himself embarrassment from having other sexual misdeeds revealed. And despite all the criticism of Larry Flynt for threatening to embarrass Republicans for such conduct, the head of Livingston is not his trophy. Rather, whispers in the capital say it is again the extremist backbenchers who toppled Livingston. Unwilling to be led by a man who admitted to sexual indiscretion, the Republican right torpedoed an able candidate who could not pass their strict test of sexual purity.
This story was published on January 6, 1999.
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:RzAmkNSRpbYJ:www-tech.mit.edu/V118/N65/ring.65c.html+House+Speakers,+Gingrich,+Livingston+have+resigned&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=7