Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Inhofe (R-OK) thanks Fox News for not spreading Global Warming myth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:38 AM
Original message
James Inhofe (R-OK) thanks Fox News for not spreading Global Warming myth
Video: Senate Environment Committee chair says global warming is media hysteria

David Edwards
Published: Saturday September 30, 2006

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Environment_Cmte_Chair_says_global_0930.html

Global warming is a myth created by media hysteria, says Senator James Inhofe (R-OK). Inhofe, who is Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, went on Fox News to counter the "lies" told by most of the media.

Inhofe said that Fox News "is the exception" to the media, which is spreading the myth of global warming.



A transcript follows the video.

HOST: You recently did give a speech about this. Tell us where you stand. Do you think that global warming exists?

MR. INHOFE: Yeah, well, first of all, the earth's temperature is warming right now but, I believe, from natural causes. The hype in the media is just -- you guys Fox News, you're just really the exception -- but the speech I made, the eighth speech I made on this subject on the floor on Monday concentrated on just the media and how they're distorting this thing. You have got to keep in mind, you guys, how back in the turn of the century, starting about 1900, back then they said, "well, we got a cooling period that's coming up, an ice age. We're all going to die." Then they went into the 1930's and they said, "it's global warming." Then they went into the 1950 and they said it's... So, it's always been hysteria and now we look at it and see that the preponderance of the scientific evidence, since 1999, has actually, has refuted many of the things that they are saying right now in terms of human or green house gasses causing global warming.

---SNIP---

HOST: And the thing that is difficult is that a lot of people signed on to it but aren't following it either. So, there is a big debate about that. Let me ask you this. Are we as a country, as a nation, doing better trying to see, you know, what we do could adversely effect the planet or are we moving in the right direction when it come to making sure that we aren't unnecessarily destroying the planet.

MR. INHOFE: Yeah, well, we really are. This president, president Bush, has an initiative that far exceeds what anyone else has done. It would be a mandated 70% reduction in socs(sic), noc(sic), mercury, things that are pollutants. Keep in mind, and CO2 is not a pollutant. So, we are doing it. So, we are doing it. It's a success story since the Clean Air Act of 1970. And in spite of the fact that we have twice as many cars, twice as many in the population, our air is much cleaner. It is a success story. And those who don't want it to be told are the one who are saying, "Ah, we have global warming." This is something that people, you know, politicians are afraid to talk about. Just because of the huge amounts of money that the far-left environmentalists pour into campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Karma and nature will have their way w/Oklahoma thanks 2 asshats like...
...the esteemed Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Inhofe is a complete jackass...
He gives Ted Stevens a run for his money in the :crazy: category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. It sure would be nice if Inhofe could be tied to the Foley scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. He should read EPA's website: "Global Warming - Impacts"
Yes, that's the same EPA headed by Bushbots now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC