Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hastert third straight Republican Speaker of the House with a sex scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:57 PM
Original message
Hastert third straight Republican Speaker of the House with a sex scandal
The Party of Family Values is about to lose its third straight Speaker of the House amid talk of sex scandals.

Newt Gingrich was the first to go, here is what Salon.com reported about him during the Monica hearings.

Gingrich pioneered a denial of adultery that some observers would later christen "the Newt Defense": Oral sex doesn't count. In a revealing psychological portrait of the "inner" Gingrich that appeared in Vanity Fair (September 1995), Gail Sheehy uncovered a woman, Anne Manning, who had an affair in Washington in 1977 with a married Gingrich.

"We had oral sex," Manning revealed. "He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'" She added that Gingrich threatened her: "If you ever tell anybody about this, I'll say you're lying."

Manning was then married to a professor at West Georgia, the backwater college where Gingrich taught. "I don't claim to be an angel," she told Sheehy, but "he's morally dishonest."

Gingrich refused to comment on Manning's charges, though he has admitted sexual indiscretions during his first marriage -- hey, it was the '70s, man! But Newt's oral sex denial proved embarrassing at a time when he was the secular leader of the "family values" crowd, appearing frequently at Christian Coalition gatherings.


Next came Bob Livingston. Here is an article from when he resigned.

Fearing that a controversy over his sexual past would undercut his power and tear apart his family, Rep. Bob Livingston (R-La.) yesterday told an astounded House he will not assume the speakership he claimed last month but would instead resign from Congress next year.

snip

Livington made his decision early yesterday, after a long night of soul-searching and consultation with his wife of 33 years, Bonnie. It was his wife who had insisted that he disclose his past extramarital affairs on Thursday, after learning that Hustler magazine was preparing an expose about Livingston and other members of Congress.

At the heart of his decision was both political calculation and personal concern, according to associates and aides. Even before his official election as speaker by the incoming House, Livingston's support among Republicans had begun to erode because of outrage among a handful of social conservatives and moderates over his sexual revelations.

Reps. Donald Manzullo (R-Ill.) and Steve Largent (R-Okla.), both committed religious conservatives, were among the most outspoken critics, while a few prominent moderates said privately that they were upset because Livingston hadn't disclosed the affairs before he was picked to succeed outgoing Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). With Republicans holding a majority edge over the Democrats of only six seats in the incoming House, Livingston would have lived in constant fear of losing a handful of defectors.


And now we have Hastert, who knew that a pedophile was Chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children and did nothing about it.

I want the Republicans who went after Clinton so hard to tell me why their party has now had three Speakers in a row with sex scandals.

We now know that the reason that the Republicans who lecture us for so many hours on sexual morality seem so knowledgeable on these issues sometimes, they have had a lot of first hand experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hastert coverup is reason to call for his resignation!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why, so BONER can get the spot?
No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Looks like Boner will have to resign as well
The resignation rocked the Capitol, and especially Foley's GOP colleagues, as lawmakers were rushing to adjourn for at least six weeks. House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) told The Washington Post last night that he had learned this spring of inappropriate "contact" between Foley and a 16-year-old page. Boehner said he then told House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). Boehner later contacted The Post and said he could not remember whether he talked to Hastert.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Don't you love it? Rep leaders hear about "inappropriate contact"
between a Member of Congress and a 16-year old page and what do they do? They casually mention it to another Rep leader (or maybe not - it was so unimportant, who can remember?), wash their hands of it and never follow up.

Sure is a different approach from they way they behaved upon hearing about "inappropriate contact" between the President and a grown-ass woman - we couldn't see them for the dust they kicked up scampering to the microphones, the FBI, Ken Starr, and whoever else would listen to them screaming about "OH, LAWDY, LAWDY - we cannot HAVE this!!! INVESTIGATE INVESTIGATE INVESTIGATE!!! We must grind this man into the dirt NOW or else, how can we ever face our children?!?!?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Boner shouldn't skate when he also knew of Foley follies...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Absolutely
They both need to be held responsible for the COVER UP. Yell it from the rooftops all the way to election day.
BTW, I'm surprised we haven't had a terrorist alert. They're slipping.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. So how do the right wing Christians justify their votes?
We need to give this info to them. The right wing bushbots would vote republican if Christ said he was a democrat. We can't give them any credence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. This should have come out last year. They really messed
up the timing of this. Last year would have been a lot better for them, I think they wanted to hide this & hope that it would go away completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Its like the Church hides Pedophilia Now Congress
and raping children in Iraq covered up too

This government is extremely morally sterile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting, given that Delay picked him...
because he was interested in food rather than sex. I guess no one thought of someone else's sex scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Republicans love children! They love to have sex with them, brainwash..
them by forcing them into psycho-jesus camps, and beat them into praising the lord!

These guys are all about family values - So long as they are MANSON family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hastert is the Cardinal Law of the GOP
Cardinal Law as in the arrogant pedophile enabler who was run out of the Boston Archdiocese on a rail a few years back. Hastert fills the same role for the Republicans in Congress -- putting a damage control lid on "youthful indiscretions", while admonishing the offender to cool it lest it make the party of God and apple pie look less than divine in the eyes of the voting public. Too bad, the lid's been blown off. It'd sure be sweet to see Hastert go down in flames come November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. good analogy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. And how many times did they have to watch porn videos to decide they were
porn? Seriously, I can't remember, but it was an incredible number of times. Wasn't it like 900 hours of porn watching?

think about it, taxpayers paid these people to watch 900(? correct me please) hours of porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I haven't heard about that one
If anyone has a link please provide it, because I would be very interested in reading up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC