Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If We Want to Win: We Ignore the Wisdom of George Lakoff at Our Own Risk!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:05 PM
Original message
If We Want to Win: We Ignore the Wisdom of George Lakoff at Our Own Risk!
George Lakoff: Twelve Traps to Avoid

by George Lakoff and the Rockridge Institute

For progressives to succeed in taking back this country, we need to stay true to our values and communicate them effectively. To accomplish this mission, we need to be aware of the traps that have often tripped up progressives in the past.

In this preview of the new book, Thinking Points: Communicating Our American Values and Vision, A Progressive's Handbook by George Lakoff and the Rockridge Institute, we present twelve traps to avoid as we make our case to restore an America that is true to its best principles.

1. The Issue Trap

We hear it said all the time: Progressives won't unite behind any set of ideas. We all have different ideas and care about different issues. The truth is that progressives do agree at the level of values and that there is a real basis for progressive unity. Progressive values cut across issues. So do principles and forms of argument. Conservatives argue conservatism, no matter what the issue. Progressives should argue progressivism. We need to get out of issue silos that isolate arguments and keep us from the values and principles that define an overall progressive vision.

2. The Poll Trap

Many progressives slavishly follow polls. The job of leaders is to lead, not follow. Besides, contrary to popular belief, polls in themselves do not present accurate empirical evidence. Polls are only as accurate as the framing of their questions, which is often inadequate. Real leaders don't use polls to find out what positions to take; they lead people to new positions.

3. The Laundry List Trap

Progressives tend to believe that people vote on the basis of lists of programs and policies. In fact, people vote based on values, connection, authenticity, trust, and identity.

4. The Rationalism Trap

There is a commonplace--and false--theory that reason is completely conscious, literal (applies directly to the objective world), logical, universal, and unemotional. Cognitive science has shown that every one of these assumptions is false. These assumptions lead progressives into other traps: assuming that hard facts will persuade voters, that voters are "rational" and vote in their self-interest and on the issues, and that negating a frame is an effective way to argue against it.

5. The No-Framing-Necessary Trap

Progressives often argue that "truth doesn't need to be framed" and that the "facts speak for themselves." People use frames--deep-seated mental structures about how the world works--to understand facts. Frames are in our brains and define our common sense. It is impossible to think or communicate without activating frames, and so which frame is activated is of crucial importance. Truths need to be framed appropriately to be seen as truths. Facts need a context.

6. The Policies-Are-Values Trap

Progressives regularly mistake policies with values, which are ethical ideas like empathy, responsibility, fairness, freedom, justice, and so on. Policies are not themselves values, though they are, or should be, based on values. Thus, Social Security and universal health insurance are not values; they are policies meant to reflect and codify the values of human dignity, the common good, fairness, and equality.

7. The Centrist Trap

There is a common belief that there is an ideological "center"--a large group of voters either with a consistent ideology of their own or lined up left to right on the issues or forming a "mainstream," all with the same positions on issues. In fact, the so-called center is actually made up of biconceptuals, people who are conservative in some aspects of life and progressive in others. Voters who self-identify as "conservative" often have significant progressive values in important areas of life. We should address these "partial progressive" biconceptuals through their progressive identities, which are often systematic and extensive.

A common mistaken ideology has convinced many progressives that they must "move to the right" to get more votes. In reality, this is counterproductive. By moving to the right, progressives actually help activate the right's values and give up on their own. In the process, they also alienate their base.

8. The "Misunderestimating" Trap

Too many progressives think that people who vote conservative are just stupid, especially those who vote against their economic self-interest. Progressives believe that we only have to tell them the real economic facts, and they will change the way they vote. The reality is that those who vote conservative have their reasons, and we had better understand them. Conservative populism is cultural--not economic--in nature. Conservative populists see themselves as oppressed by elitist liberals who look down their noses at them, when they are just ordinary, moral, right-thinking folks. They see liberals as trying to impose an immoral "political correctness" on them, and they are angry about it.

Progressives also paint conservative leaders as incompetent and not very smart, based on a misunderstanding of the conservative agenda. This results from looking at conservative goals through progressive values. Looking at conservative goals through conservative values yields insight and shows just how effective conservatives really are.

9. The Reactive Trap

For the most part, we have been letting conservatives frame the debate. Conservatives are taking the initiative on policy making and getting their ideas out to the public. When progressives react, we echo the conservative frames and values, so our message is not heard or, even worse, reinforces their ideas. Progressives need a collection of proactive policies and communication techniques to get our own values out on our own terms. "War rooms" and "truth squads" must change frames, not reinforce conservative frames. But even then, they are not nearly enough. Progressive leaders, outside of any party, must come together in an ongoing, long-term, organized national campaign that honestly conveys progressive values to the public--day after day, week after week, year after year, no matter what the specific issues of the day are.

10. The Spin Trap

Some progressives believe that winning elections or getting public support is a matter of clever spin and catchy slogans--what we call "surface framing." Surface framing is meaningless without deep framing--our deepest moral convictions and political principles. Framing, used honestly at both the deep and surface levels, is needed to make the truth visible and our values clear. Spin, on the other hand, is the dishonest use of surface linguistic frames to hide the truth. And progressive values and principles--the deep frames--must be in place before slogans can have an effect; slogans alone accomplish nothing. Conservative slogans work because they have been communicating their deep frames for decades.

11. The Policyspeak Trap

Progressives consistently use legislative jargon and bureaucratic solutions, like "Medicare prescription drug benefits," to speak to the public about their positions. Instead, progressives should speak in terms of the common concerns of voters--for instance, how a policy will let you send your daughter to college, or how it will let you launch your own business.

12. The Blame Game Trap

It is convenient to blame our problems on the media and on conservative lies. Yes, conservative leaders have regularly lied and used Orwellian language to distort the truth, and yes, the media have been lax, repeating the conservatives' frames. But we have little control over that. We can control only how we communicate. Simply correcting a lie with the truth is not enough. We must reframe from our moral perspective so that the truth can be understood. This reframing is needed to get our deep frames into public discourse. If enough people around the country honestly, effectively, and regularly express a progressive vision, the media will be much more likely to adopt our frames.

Entire Article, and Author Credits and Information:
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/417

****

This man is a genius!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. DFA had a class this week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. It was a great class!
I learned that I have a lot to learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What did he teach? What was included in the class?
It sounds like a wonderful opportunity!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. It was a conference call type thing with over 3300 participants.
We listened to George Lakoff teach us how to reframe issues so that we could be positive advocates for the dems in the coming elections.

DFA set up a blog to discuss the things we learned. I don't know if you need an access code to get in there to read and ask questions, but here is the link to the blog that was created for this class. It also has info on upcoming classes.

http://www.dfalink.com/group.php?id=1118

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. values, values and, um, did he say values?
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 03:44 PM by welshTerrier2
i read this a few days ago ... absolutely dead on the money ...

this highlights one of my greatest frustrations with "party cheerleaders" on DU ... i think too many here see an impatience coming from the left that just is not really there ... if people could get the "values" message, we'd have far less discord ...

for example, and this is just one of a zillion issues, take gay marriage as an example ... some seem to believe that it would hurt the party if Democrats pushed hard for gay marriage ... maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't ...

and so, this one is a "purist" and that candidate is a jerk because there is no agreement on how to handle the issue ... the "purists" are seen as demanding total and immediate compliance with their views; the candidate cheerleaders are seen telling gay people to "compromise" and settle for second-class citizenship so that Democrats, not gays apparently, can "win" ...

we will never build strength through unity with this kind of dialogue in place ...

the solution is to try to reach agreement on what our party's fundamental VALUES are ... timing, tactics, implementation and message are entirely different ... so, in this particular example, we should agree that gays deserve to be treated with the same respect and have the exact same rights as every other citizen ... this means, gays should have the right to marry ... period ...

now, if it is deemed to be politically damaging to push this issue in the near-term, especially if the party does not have the political clout to get it passed, that's a different matter ... in that case, the party should clearly and unequivocally state what its values are but also explain to its constituents that the implementation process will take some time ... one would hope that the party's gay constituents and those who support them would be more tolerant of a slower pace knowing that all within the party are on the same page with regard to ultimate objectives ...

there should be no room for compromise when fundamental human rights are the issue; negotiation, compromise and tolerance come into play only when the process to achieve the goal is being discussed ...

sometimes, we may not agree on just what the facts of the current situation actually are ... for example, i believe mega-corporations and big monied interests have full control over our government ... other Democrats may or may not agree ... suffice it to say that the fundamental underlying VALUE of good governance is that the government should be committed to serving the best interests of ALL the people and the country itself ... if we have a situation where there is excessive corporate influence or even control, "we the people" are not being represented and served by our own government ...

many Democrats believe this can be remedied by campaign finance reforms and lobby reforms ... this is where i challenge Democrats ... the underlying VALUE is that "we the people" must be represented by our own government ... i am skeptical that the reforms proposed by liberal Democrats go far enough ... but i am also tolerant of their views ... let's try their reforms FIRST ... but, i then ask them, if their reforms prove inadequate, are they willing to go further to restrict the corrupting influence of big money? if their "little reforms" fail to solve the problem, will they do whatever is necessary to achieve the underlying value? my idea is capping wealth ... i'm sure there are other approaches that might be tried ... the problem is, i never really get an answer to this question ... if we don't agree on fighting for our values, we will never succeed in the long run ...

anyway, great post!!!! Lakoff is remarkably clear and cogent ... thanks for posting this ... k&r !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't he the greatest?
If only the Democrats would jusr DO THIS STUFF! They bring all this corporate-friendly hard-ons into their campaigns, and yet, THIS MAN is what they truly need.

This man, as I said, is a GENIUS!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. if only ...
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 04:06 PM by welshTerrier2
it's so clear ... it's so easy ... it's so necessary ...

we spend so much time here "keeping score" and "cheerleading" and not nearly enough time earning points ... we earn points by clarifying our values and laying out a strategy to achieve them ... some believe "just winning" is a strategy but they've omitted a critical step along the way ...

btw, this line just killed me: "People use frames--deep-seated mental structures about how the world works--to understand facts." ... absent a foundation, every argument we present is forced to stand on its own absent any sort of symbiosis ... every thought is ad hoc ... nothing we see eminates from a broader context ... the result? we are constantly reinventing the wheel ... arguments gain strength when they are part of something larger ... the "cost of communication" goes way down because people get where you're coming from in the first place ...

instead, we present laundry lists at a much more superficial level ... it makes all our candidates much weaker than they should be ... and it's not just about one candidate or just one election; setting the broader context and then building on it gives us more and more strength and clarity from one election cycle to the next ...

the question still unanswered is: how do we get the entire party to understand the Lakoff themes and stay on message? this "herding cats" business may be cute but it's getting pretty old ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. More dems need to find Jeeezzzuusss
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. "people who vote conservative are just stupid"
Well, they are, but they have their reasons (snicker).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wish this was pinned to the front page.
I recall, right of the 04 debacle, there was even talk of a forum to discuss this kind of thing. I posted there a bit, but it just died in favor of the internecine wars that everyone loves so much.

George Lakoff is a very valuable resource. Thanks for bringing these points, and the man himself, back to the fore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I put it on my Journal...
so if you ever need to refer to it, it'll be there! :)

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a bunch of crap
"values, connection, authenticity, trust, and identity." Well, then we whould have about 300 seats in the House come January.

The GOP own the media. Period. Until that changes, we will not change the direction of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree with you about the media... don't get me wrong.
But, most of the time (Like about 90%, maybe?) the Democrats are saying nothing interesting, new, or even that different from the Republicans, so why SHOULD the media drop their coverage of the Repubs?

Ithink it's also a power thing. If we speak as if we have power, and are bold in our thinking and corageous with our proposals, and aren't just regeritating Republican talking points, the media might just come around. Hey! -- It could happen!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's the media, plus people's preconceived notions
Most people aren't paying attention and do not realize that Republicans today are not the Republicans of a generation ago. So they keep on voting for them. That's how Bush can say, "they'll raise your taxes!" and get away with it.

The truth is that the Democrats are a lot more conservative these days. We want to retain those traditional American values like freedom. The Republicans are the radicals now.

People think they know what each party stands for, but they're wrong. If the media will report the facts, and if people will stop listening to words and vote according to what these people actually do, then there's hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Good point! n/t
TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Progressives"? Spare me.
I don't like the term. I can't get past it. It's still the same old, same old.
Call it framing. Call it whatever you want.

The Earth is dying. What are we going to do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Kvetch about semantics, apparently.
:eyes:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. The smartest post on DU for the last year!
There has been so much pretension, so much self-cocking praise, so much utter nonsense pushed in DU posts for the last year. And Lakoff nails them all in a simple, clear, easy to read post.

It's the easiest thing in the world to beat up on Bush and the conservatives, your co-worker who still has a W sticker on his car, and the right-wing Christian guys. "This is what I'm not," the poster says. Okay, dude, but what are you FOR? And don't answer with a negative.

That also applies to those who want to cut down on other candidates - and I'm guilty of this, since I think Kerry should go run a hardware store instead of blowing another election, but at least I can state why he's no good as a 2008 candidate.

I could go on and on, but Lakoff has said it all in a brief, concise post. (Which is something else people on DU could learn - how to say things simply, without reiteration and directly.) I only wish his book had been published a year ago, when it might have helped win the 2006 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Here is a list of his books:
How Democrats and Progressives Can Win
by George Lakoff
(I'm currently reading this one, and can recommend it!)

Women, Fire and Dangerous Things
by George Lakoff

Where Mathematics Comes From
How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being
Co-written with Rafael Nuñez

Philosophy in the Flesh
The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought
Co-written with Mark Johnson
(Have read this one, and it is definitely for people interested in philosophical thought)

More Than Cool Reason
A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor
Co-written with Mark Johnson

Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
A fresh look at how we think and talk about political and moral ideas.
by George Lakoff
(Have read this one, and can definitely recommend it, especially if you are interested in political ethics and how that shapes each Party)

Metaphors We Live By
Co-written with Mark Johnson

Don't Think of an Elephant!
Know Your Values and Frame the Debate
The essential guide for progressives, this book is the antidote to the last forty years of conservative dominance of the national public policy debate.
by George Lakoff
(Have read this more than once, and can highly recommend it!)

Check these out!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
18. For those interested:
George has a website you should check out:

http://www.georgelakoff.com/


TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick!
WE ignore this at OUR OWN peril, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
22.  The Poll Trap
Many DUer's fall into this one- even though they should know better.

It amazes me sometimes what otherwise intelligent people will believe as Gospel truth, just because Gallop says so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC