Charlie and Nancy must have eaten too much seafood and the mercury

[donsu]

has curdled their brains.

there the two were yesterday wailing that Chavez couldn't badmouth smirk while standing on US soil (or in Charlie's district), only americans can badmouth smirk.

the two of them should have been thanking Chavez and telling americans to 'see, the world knows just how corrupt the murderous, criminal smirk and gang are'.

but no, they sounded like 9 yr. olds. I was embarrassed.

and congress was busy trying to decide if we should torture or not and just how much torture we can do, or the CIA can do, or smirk can do. you know, torture people who "don't wear a uniform", as if a "uniform" had anything to do with it.

congress people should be standing on their chairs yelling 'pen and paper ballots, hand counted with an audience' instead of defining torture.

madness, total madness.

and peabrains were calling Washington Journal to say "they cut off heads, we have the right to torture them". as if the depleted uranium poisoning in our bombs and munitions will murder people for generations doesn't trump the cutting off of heads.

and the murderous, criminal bushmilhousegang had a contest to see which of 3 corporation's plans would win the contract to "protect the borders". how about a contest to see how many employers who hire illegals can be arrested by the cops in one month.

and congress is working madly to pass - anything, something - so they can go back on vacation so they can CAMPAIGN.

and the Pope of child abusers is trying to start a religious war - please nobody take his bait. be more honorable then the Pope.

and I'm still pissed about something that happened soon after the 2000 coup d'etat. one of the progressive sites (can't remember which one) started a new forum to discuss the coup d'etat. I posted that us americans should be out in the streets revolting and going to the Supreme Court, dragging the criminals out by their hair when a poster said to me:

"not yet Pilgrim, not yet"

and the forum was shut down forever.

I didn't like being called a Pilgrim and I want to know when the hell "YET" is?!

[Captain Hilts]

1. Charlie was right to say what he said. nt

[Captain Hilts]

8. Rumsfeld was wrong to call Chavez names. Chavez is wrong...

ESPECIALLY at the UN.

[slackmaster]

2. SNAP OUT OF IT people - They're POLITICIANS!

:dunce:

[bullimiami]

3. you notice they didnt say chavez was wrong.

they just said he shouldnt have said it there.

i was less bothered by it when I heard their actual statements.

[Lexingtonian]

4. Excuse me, but

I'm get tired of all this fucking wailing about this tiny tempest in a teapot.

Isn't there an election soon, in which actual progress and change might be going on?

[acmejack]

5. you'll notice Donsu, that there are very few of us.

American exceptionalism runs deep even here. He's our dumbass, so no one else can say anything bad about him, even if it is true. He can offend the entire world, commit heinous crimes, but no one, absolutely no one, can stand up and state the obvious, even if it is exactly what has been said here a thousand times before.

God forbid, there is an election in forty seven days and your raiing about this point might "distract" our attention from this event as if crooked election machinery, balless politicians, a torture endorsing Congress, media corruption and a perverted Bill of Rights hadn't pretty much seen to that. If we lose the election it's going to be your fault for raising this subject!

What a bunch of damned scolds frequent this place!

[SaveElmer]

6. Rangel and Pelosi were correct...nt

[cali]

7. LOL

NOt only whiny but damned silly, too.

[Odin2005]

9. Come on people they are POLITICIANS, what do you think they'll say?

The average joe has been brainwashed to think of Chavez as the spawn of Satan. Praising him just goves political hay to the Pukes.