Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THURS., C-SPAN3, 9AM ET ---Impeachment Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:32 PM
Original message
THURS., C-SPAN3, 9AM ET ---Impeachment Hearing

http://c-span.org/homepage.asp

IN THE SENATE
Impeachment Hearing
A House Judiciary Subcmte. will hold a legislative hearing on H.Res. 916, a resolution impeach-
ing Manuel L. Real, a U.S. District Judge of the Central District of California, for high crimes & mis-
demeanors. In Feb. 2000, Judge Real allegedly interceded on behalf of a defendant known to him.
THURS., C-SPAN3, 9AM ET
THE BILL H.RES. 916
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like the judge did some serious wrong
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 04:51 PM by MrCoffee
From the LA Times, January 18, 2004:

"A veteran federal judge faces disciplinary proceedings after he improperly seized control of a bankruptcy case in an effort to protect a woman whose probation he had decided to oversee personally, according to a federal judicial disciplinary council."

"Penalties for District Judge Manuel L. Real, 79, who has been a controversial member of the federal judiciary in Los Angeles since 1966, could range from a private reprimand to loss of the authority to hear cases."

"The proceedings in the case have largely taken place out of the public eye. The judicial council of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which supervises federal judges in California and eight other Western states, handed down its ruling on Real in mid-December, but the decision has never been formally published and has not been placed on the court website. The decision, cryptically titled "In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct," does not mention Real by name, but his identity is revealed in a court opinion referred to in the disciplinary panel's ruling."

"Legal experts say that although the next steps in the case are up to the chief judge of the 9th Circuit, the council's ruling means that some sort of penalty against Real is highly likely. That alone would make his case rare. More than 99% of the complaints filed against federal judges around the country are dismissed out of hand. The 9th Circuit council has reprimanded only two jurists in the last decade, while rejecting hundreds of complaints, according to official records."

http://www.clr.org/Real-Manuel-L.html





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC