Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McAuliffe to join Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:16 PM
Original message
McAuliffe to join Clinton

McAuliffe to join Clinton




What timing! This has to be Repub spin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. been rumors
I guess it's true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, I don't click on blind links like that. Not trusting enough.
What is it I'm expected to find there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Phew. I'm not totally crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No you're not crazy,
but the timing of this story is bizarre!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell you!
:puke:

By GAWD they're PERFECT for each other!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow, you got that right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Annoying OP! Here's the gist of it--from "The Hill"...
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/092006/mcauliffe.html

by Alexander Bolton 9/20/06

"Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe has told business associates and Democratic donors that he will chair Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) presidential campaign next year, according to several Democratic sources.

"Together, Clinton, the favorite to win the Democratic nomination, and McAuliffe, the top money man in Democratic politics, have a good chance of raising $100 million before the first official contest, the Iowa caucuses in January 2008.

"While Clinton and her staff insist she is focused solely on winning reelection in New York this November, the decision over who will be in charge of getting her elected to the White House is already settled.

"McAuliffe told The Hill yesterday that Clinton has not made a decision on running for president and will not do so until after Nov. 7. McAuliffe also denied telling friends that he will serve as chairman, although sources contradict him.

------------------------------------------

Terry McAuliffe ought to be drummed out of the Democratic Party. Aside from Bilderberg 'Democrat' Christopher Dodd, McAuliffe is THE 'Democrat' most responsible for Bushite corporations gaining control of our election system, with TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code, and virtually no audit/recount controls, during the 2002-2004 period--a fascist coup engineered by the biggest crooks in the Anthrax Congress, Tom Delay and Bob Ney, and FACILITATED by the MIND-BOGGLING SILENCE of the Democratic Party leadership, if not their outright collusion and corruption.

And that's the end of what little hope I had for Hillary Clinton, as a potential "good government" Democrat who could be lobbied on the matter of transparent elections and our right to vote--if she were to be Diebolded into office (as I at one time expected--and it's still possible; lots of reasons the fascists would want her in, for one thing to start taking the blame for all Bush horrors, and to get a Draft for the corporate oil war). But her association with McAuliffe--that he will be DIRECTING her campaign!--ends that hope. It will be corporate control of our election results all the way with Hillary. We may still want to try, if they Diebold her in. But, in that case, our main strategy for election reform should remain focused on state/local election venues, since no solution concocted with the collusion of Terry McAuliffe, or anyone who could associate with him after what he did to the grass roots of the Democratic Party, and to our country and our democracy, will be of any use in restoring transparent elections. It will have poison pills (such as federalization of elections--centralized control)--or will be entirely inadequate, yet given the name of "reform" (for instance, jettisoning of the touchscreens, but retention of the optiscans and central tabulators, both of which use TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY software and are highly riggable).

This is very bad news, indeed. Of course I know what a corporatist Hillary is. I have no illusions about that. And she no doubt wants to preside over the U.S. occupation of the entire Middle East, afer the Bush thugs kick their way further in. But I did have hopes that we might get quick and real reform of the election system--for the sake of the future--if she were president. My reason: She and Charles Schumer were the ONLY two U.S. Senate Democrats who voted against the infamous "Help America Vote Act" (the bill that destroyed our democracy, by fast-tracking untested electronic voting with over $3 billion in boondoggle funding, straight into the pockets of Bushite corporations, through the fingers of corrupt Republican and Democratic election officials and legislators throughout the land.) Go figure. The ONLY two Senate Dems who opposed it! This possibly has something to do with NY Dems wanting to hang onto their old, reliable, and virtually unriggable lever voting machines. (The Bushite Feds are now trying to pry NYers' fingers off these dependable dinosaurs, in favor of secretly programmed Bushite machines.)

An impressive vote--flying in the face of all her other votes and policies. But McAuliffe. Jeez. No way. She might as well have Wally O'Dell or Howard Ahmanson as her campaign chair. Or Karl Rove. That's my opinion of McAuliffe--criminally negligent, very corrupt, and a threat to our weakened and failing democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. If this is true, Hillary is doomed
he couldn't beat His Imperial Incompetency or his stooges in Congress. As party chairman, he was a bust.

I'm not a big Hillary fan and I am now confident that she will never be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Can you imagine her Cabinet?
Let's see, Lieberman as Secretary of State, Biden as Secretary of Finance . . . :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. . . . and Will Marshall as National Security Advisor
And he would be an improvement over Condi Rice how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do we really need a repeat of this entire crew again? We need
real change- not four more years of Clintons. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, Terry McAuliffe has a wonderful record of electoral success
If Senator Clinton is serious, James Carville will be running her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. You could knock me over with a feather....
:sarcasm:

Well, this is that little "tip off" those who insist "But, Hillary probably won't even run for POTUS in 2008..." If McAuliffe is coming on board to raise money (which is the only thing he's good at), she running. This is as good as an announcement, as far as I'm concerned.

Fasten your seatbelts, it's gonna be a bumpy ride.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Eric Alterman said if Hillary ran then Gore could come in and take the
"oxygen" away from any other Dem Candidates who wanted to run. He thought that would make a very interesting race.

It might not be a bad thing for those of us who hope Gore will come in "late." I think his theory was,Hillary takes all the early "oxygen" (money) and her if her polling doesn't seem to be holding up nationally then it leaves room for Gore. It would be an excellent debate...Gore vs. the DLC.

I'll try to find his article and post if I can. It was on his MSNBC Blog and maybe they've taken it down since he was fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Just Hillary running, and calling in all her husband's IOUs --
now with McAuliffe doing the arm-twisting and collecting of those IOUs -- will suck up every last campaign $$$ for anyone other than Gore, so he's probabaly the only one who can stop her from getting the nomination. Trust me... she just bought herself the nomination if Gore doesn't run.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. If Hillary decides to get in ....Gore won't
no one ever just gets into these presidential races, without explicit permission from the party insiders. The only one who ever really bucked their system, was Howard Dean. But like it or not Bill is still a force within the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. NY Post reporting it too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. WTF...
While their polls may consider Hillary "the favorite to win the Democratic nomination", I have yet to see anyone here on DU who's first (or second, or third) choice is Hillary. Of course McAuliffe is coming in, he can't run a party for shit, but he sure can raise $$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Well, I don't know where you've been,
but you can certainly count this DUer as a Hillary Clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. If she wins the nomination, I'll have to support her
but she falls far down the list of candidates I'd like to see. Judging by all the threads I've seen here about potential candidates, I don't think I'm the only one. I just don't recall seeing any threads pushing her for the nomination, while I've seen several for Gore, Clark, Feingold, Edwards, Kerry, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hillary really doesn't want to be president!
Terry McAwful is the worst possible choice and has 0 track record of success. Let that campaign fall apart of its own ego suffocating it. But Terry, :wow:, Hillary really doesn't know how to spot fresh or GREAT talent does she? What a loser... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Will Bob Shrum be next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Keefer's got this coming up next....
I think, stay tuned just in case :hi: Oh, it's Wednesday now :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC