Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: Paid Bloggers Stoke Va. Senate Battle: Test Limits of Finance Laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:05 AM
Original message
WP,pg1: Paid Bloggers Stoke Va. Senate Battle: Test Limits of Finance Laws
Paid Bloggers Stoke Senate Battle in Va.
Campaigns Test Limits of Finance Laws
By Michael D. Shear and Tim Craig
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, September 17, 2006; Page A01

RICHMOND -- Virginia's U.S. Senate race has catapulted bloggers into the middle of electioneering and controversy as campaign supporters use their online forums to connect with voters, raise money and spread gossip.

Liberal bloggers -- two of whom are on the payroll of Democratic challenger James Webb -- fanned the flames last month after Sen. George Allen aimed a derogatory remark at a young Webb volunteer. That hype has helped Webb close a double-digit Allen lead in public polls and was a blow to the Republican senator's possible presidential bid in 2008.

The lack of an effective response from conservative bloggers has prompted Allen to hire a Virginia blogger as his "new media coordinator" to goose GOP supporters into action. And four of Virginia's most popular conservative bloggers launched http://www.allens-a-team.com last week to counter what they call liberal attacks.

Together, the Webb and Allen campaigns are transforming the image of the independent blogger, clicking away on his own dime from his basement. And they are pushing the boundaries of federal campaign finance laws as blogs that once were personal diaries have come to resemble full-blown campaign operations that don't have to be reported as expenses.

The goal of the paid bloggers, both campaigns say, is to deluge online political journals with positive tidbits about their candidate and draw attention to the most negative news about their opponent. The campaign bloggers sometimes write their own bits. Other times, they spread gossip generated by others....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/16/AR2006091600575.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Paid bloggers have been around a long time. And they will be
around for a lot longer, whether they are paid over or under the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. What about newspapers that were once vital information sources...
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 10:10 AM by ClassWarrior
...that "have come to resemble full-blown campaign operations that don't have to be reported as expenses?"

What about that, WAPO?

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cool.....
Great throw back to the Main Stream....

They are just jealous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. True, they are jealous. But they're not "mainstream."
They're the Corporate Media.

:hi:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sorry, what's the threat to the American Way here?
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 10:20 AM by Kagemusha
Anyone can post on the Internet - including opponents of an incumbent Senator. That's not the case on the airwaves, where no onewithout a suitcase full of money is going to get heard.

So what's the problem here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd rather have a paid blogger...
Than a so-called "journalist" who's secretly on the take from BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In the 21st century the press is openly on the take.
The Woodwards, Millers, Gannons, Armstrongs et al, openly feed at the Bush Whore House trough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gee, two "paid liberal bloggers"? vs
thousands of financed "Republican" attack websites, bloggers, newspapers, radio stations (who also live off the "liberal" idea of the "public" airwaves"), etc ...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC