Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's word for the day: "Clarity"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:33 AM
Original message
Bush's word for the day: "Clarity"

Just listening to him in some kind of Q&A on NPR (press conference, perhaps): The problem with the Geneva Conventions is that there's no "clarity" to what constitutes visiting indignity upon prisoners. Our armed forces need "clarity" so they know they're not violating the law. What is "indignity"? It's vague and requires clarity!

Sheesh.

First f*ckin' president in 60 years to suddenly need this "clarified".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nerve. He can't string a sentence together, yet he wants clarity? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Also "professionals"
as in "the professionals need clarity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did he say it like it was a word the average American has NEVER heard?
Like GLASNOST and PERESTROIKA were carefully pronounced by overeager newsanchors back in the day?

CLAAAAR-it-TEEEEEEEEE....a complex idea that average Murkins jus' don' unnnerstannn....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Clarity" means write loopholes
See, the language of the Conventions, which have served the world well for 60 years, doesn't have the sort of loophole language that Bush needs so that he can subvert their intent. When it's something as broad the language of the Conventions, torture is pretty much ruled out, and Chimpy wants to torture the people he captures. Oh God, does he want to torture them!

Here's your "clarity," Mr. Bush: Don't torture people. If you do, you go to prison. Clear enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Guess he looked in the dictionary for a word to use
Or asked Librarian Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now he's weaseling out of a question
of how he would react if an American serviceman was captured in North Korea, interrogated according to our new "standards" and sentenced based on secret evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Where was CLARITY in Florida in 2000?
The worst piece of shit ever selected for the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. geneva
"Claritygery"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC