Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Malice Aforethought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:50 PM
Original message
With Malice Aforethought
With Malice Aforethought
By Nancy Greggs

ABC Network, All Staff
To Whom It May Concern:

It was with great dismay, but not surprise, that I read about the upcoming ABC-TV production “The Path To 9/11”. The advance critiques of this film have been scathing in their assessment that the entire enterprise will be yet another glorification of the Bush administration, a whitewash of its obvious failures, and of course the now traditional finger-pointing at Bill Clinton.

The fact that this “docudrama” was penned by a political hack – a man whose leanings are, shall we say, more than a bit slanted to the extreme right – is a dead giveaway as to what the viewing public will be subjected to in the days to come: political propaganda dressed up as fact, blatant disinformation tarted up like the corporate-pleasing whore the mainstream media has become.

Suffice to say I, like millions of other Americans, will not be watching this program. And that is because I, like millions of Americans, determined long ago that ABC-TV, along with other networks, has become totally irrelevant, especially when it comes to reporting the news and the true nature of what has been happening in our nation.

I literally grew up with television. My father was one of the first TV cameramen in the country, and television was part of our lives long before our relatives and neighbors had decided to take the plunge into this new-fangled technology. In fact, my father spent the largest portion of his career with ABC-TV in New York City. He passed away two years ago, and I can’t help but wonder tonight what he would have thought about this upcoming airing. I can assure you that as someone who took great pride in the integrity of the network he once worked for, he would not have been pleased.

It is sad to think that a medium so promising in its infancy, especially in the area of news coverage, would end its days in such utter disgrace. The Conkrites, the Murrows, the Huntleys, the Brinkleys, have now been replaced by people whose only “talent” is having the right hairdo, a pleasing on-screen visage, and a willingness to do as they are told. Sadly, journalistic integrity is just another once-popular show that has been cancelled, not due to poor ratings or a waning audience share, but due to corporate masters who must be served.

Fact checking has been replaced with fax checking, as news writers rush to the fax machine to assure themselves that those on high – corporate owners, corporate sponsors – have sent their instructions on how a news story is to be slanted and spun in order to fit a political agenda, and so as not to endanger the government contracts that keep the money flowing into the right pockets.

We, the American public, have, of necessity, informed ourselves via the internet, out-of-country newspapers, and satellite TV feeds from the around the world. And what we have learned is disheartening. We know about the White House generated propaganda pieces that are aired on US television and radio networks as ‘news’; we know about the broadcasting of cleaned-up versions of Bush’s speeches and the carefully edited remarks made by his spokespeople. We know about the deletion of comments that are awkward or embarrassing, or that might be construed as not in keeping with the current administration’s talking points.

And yet you continue to present yourselves as journalists speaking truth to power, while at the same time spewing utter nonsense that has, more often than not, already been debunked in more reliable quarters as complete fabrication. There are times that nightly news broadcasts have fallen so completely into the realm of the ridiculous, one could easily believe they are watching the latest sit-com, complete with characters that are too off-the-wall to be taken seriously, too ill informed to be viewed as anything other than satiric entertainment.

It is hard to imagine that journalism was once a voice that spoke truth to the masses without regard to political double-speak, and righteously eschewed interference by any government body. It was a sacred trust, as much a part of democracy in action as fair elections, transparency of government, and freedom of speech.

What it has become is a travesty, a rewriting of history literally as it happens, a form of propaganda akin to the kind of repression of truth that American journalists once decried in covering stories about the Soviet Union and countries behind the Iron Curtain. But that was back in the days when journalistic integrity was not an aberration, but the norm.

To fail to inform the public is bad newscasting. But to purposely misinform the public is not just bad reporting; it is bad citizenship. In fact, in my opinion, it is nothing less than treasonous.

Unfortunately, too many American citizens still unwittingly believe TV news broadcasting to be accurate and unvarnished, and form their political opinions based on what they see and hear on the tiny screen that has, over the decades, gone from being part of the living room décor to being a trusted member of the family.

And never before has that trust been so completely abused, the truth so unabashedly battered, the facts so blatantly distorted and/or completely ignored as has been evident in the TV news media during the tenure of the present administration.

As I reflect on the mainstream news media nowadays, I am oft reminded of the scene from “On The Waterfront”, when Marlon Brando, as would-be fighter Terry Malloy, confronts the fact of his complete betrayal by the person he most trusted. “You was my brother, Charley. You shoulda looked out for me a little bit.”

It’s akin to what I feel when I watch TV newscasters these days. The betrayal has been complete; the mainstream media has been taking those dives for the short-end money for years, without regard to their impact on the viewers, or on our society as a whole.

Once upon a time, you WERE our brother, and you did look out for us. That was not just your job, your occupation, your livelihood; it was a responsibility you took seriously, and executed with integrity. And our country, and our world, was once a better place for it.

Now you are just another whore, servicing fat-cat corporate executives and politicos who have no more respect for you than the people you have so utterly betrayed.

It is difficult to pinpoint the most egregious of your many sins. Maybe it is the constant insult to the viewers’ intelligence, the oh-so-obvious distortion of the facts, or the arrogance of your self-delusion that you are pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes.

Or perhaps it is just the deafening sound of thirty pieces of silver jangling in your pockets, and the knowledge that you were willing to sell out your own integrity, your country, and your fellow citizens, for such a paltry amount.

Yours Most Truly,
Nancy Greggs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. as always, Ms. Greggs......
K and R. We can only hope that people don't forget:

George, this all happened on your watch. Ample evidence indicates that you and yours knew more about how "Bin Laden was determined to strike the US" than you let on. At the very least, you're guilty of negligence and incompetence.

Given what has since come to light, I can't see how anyone can rationally think otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. rational thought
is restricted to the reality based among us. There are still those who believe the Earth is flat and they will continue to believe what Ku Klux Karl tells them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Proud to be #5!
K&R.
I wish...oh how I do wish that the upper echelons of ABC-TV would not only read this but experience an epiphany of conscience...

Thanks, Nance. Once again...:patriot: :applause:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. BRAVO! Damn that was good!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Nancy, every time I see a post with your name, I have to wait to read it until I have a fresh glass of iced tea, light my candle, and sit down to truely and utterly enjoy your essays. Thank you sooo much, you are truely gifted!!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well said. Is there any way this can make the New York Times
editorial page? Seriously. It shouldn't be confined to this space alone. You're a gifted writer who knows how to cut to the quick in an entertaining manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just came from DNC website; no mention of "The Path...".
Unless the party leadership starts to speak directly to the issue of RW media bias, it's only going to get *worse*.

They have ignored it for years and now we are suffering the consequences: blatant political intervention ( i.e. in the midterm elections) by the corporate infotainment industry.

Shoulda been speaking to this all along. Now it's probably too late.

I wrote to the DNC about 10 days ago re. "The Path to 9-11" and the DNC's 'head in the sand' approach.

Still waiting for a reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Have you read this DU post by reprehensor?


Reflections on Will Pitt's "Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts"

SNIP

You may ask, "Why is it so easy for a media giant like ABC to allow for a partisan cudgel to be so finely crafted within the folds of its cloak?"

Let's also ask this musical question: "Why has the Democratic Party practically en masse allowed Neoconservatives to establish a stance from which to launch a campaign of this nature?"

To answer these questions in any substantive form will require a short walk down memory lane to examine the ideological roots of "international terrorism".

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2031398
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Just read it...
Thanks for recommending it. Nothing like a little perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. May I suggest a new term: "Propudrama"
i.e., a propaganda work posing as a "docudrama"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. or more explicitly how about "PROPAGANDADRAMA" or PROPAGANDoCUDRAMA" nt
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 11:18 AM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. and more to the point
Republican bullshit for the weak minded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danhan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Another great Rant
I always enjoy your rants!!

However, I must disagree (and I know that I do so here at my own peril) with your decision to not watch based on "advance critiques." Not watch something based on someone else's opinion of it? Since when do you let other people decide how you think?

I believe that the only way to effectively counter the opposition is to know them and how they present their side. Then one can debate, expose falsehoods and use their own words against them. I honestly believe that we should spend as much, if not more time, keeping an eye on what they're doing and saying. Then we can fight the fight.

At least as much time until my head feels like it is going to explode! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. If you do watch could you list the advertisers here for us boycotters?
That would be great and welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danhan Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. No Problem
That is the right idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. There are no advertisers
It's being presented "without commercial interruption". I just saw a trailer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. In other words, it is a *gift* by ABC -Disney to the GOP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. Holey crap now that's commitment. Well, guess the boycott is just all
things Disney. So doable. Thanks for the info and belated welcome to DU too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Boycott Disney if you like
Me, I ain't boycotting nuttin. For one, I don't know if this docudrama is as bad as it sounds without actually seeing it; and for two, even if it is, I believe in freedom of speech, even for those people foolish enough to disagree with me ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Good for you. Me, I'm squeamish accepting garbage from known distributors.
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 01:01 PM by glitch
garbage in garbage out.
Edit to add: freedom of speech includes the right to walk away from someone who you know from their history is most likely lying to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. self delete...wrong place
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 11:12 AM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. Hi danhan!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. RIghteous
One of your best yet. Thank you and keep 'em coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Fairness Doctrine must be revived,
If our country and our democracy is ever to be saved.

Excellent essay, as always. Wish I could read it in a paper with a tremendous distribution. It should be read by many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. We need to frame this as election year propaganda.
It is an attempt by Republican operatives to re write history, to make the Democrats to look soft on .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ornotna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Great rant!
You certainly have the ability to pen the words that many of us struggle with. Thank you for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. Excellent! ... K&R
I'm going to call ABC ...

Not that it will do any good ... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. sizzlingly on point...great post...k&n nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPCAworks Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. well written
and nicely thought out. But TBH I don't like some of the more conspiratorial/tinfoil hat leanings. Do you REALLY believe that Katie Couric checks her faxes for instructions from WalMart, Exxon and Merck before she opens her mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
23. To paraphrase Ted Stevens
TV is a series of rubes.

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. Every DUer
should copy/paste and print this and mail it to ABC. In fact print several copies and mail them to ABC, and get every free thinking person we know to do likewise. Hard copies are very effective, but an email avalanche wouldn't hurt either. Boycott all things Disney. Did you know Mickey Mouse encourages children to (fill in the blank)? The Mickey Mouse Club theme song played backward instructs children to worship Satan. There are hidden messages in all Disney films that tell children about public masturbation. The Taliban loves Disney for.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrictlyRockers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. GD Nance! You rock! Pulling NO punches and offering...
no quarter! These slimy ABC fucks deserve to know that we see right through their corporatist propaganda machine!!

SR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. You tell em' Nancy!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rnisson Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. You should mail this to them
...and use the internet to get 100,000 signatures on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. Thanks, Nance!
Another thoughtful, articulate piece.

I have been wondering lately what it would be like if we actually had an independent, thinking press. We desperately need someone to ask questions, not pander to the people in power and fix their hair for the camera.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. All I can say is.....
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. Nancy, I am in awe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. Bravo
for another thought provoking article. It is so true.
ABC is probably the worst of the 3 networks in it's Bush fawning.
I emailed them last night with my thoughts about this trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
38. wonderfully written but I must disagree....
for years when confronted with the oft-repeated charges of "the left-wing media", I have responded thusly.
The media doesn't care about politics, they only care about viewers, The huge media corporations are subject to the same market driven laws of supply and demand as every other business.Thats why they can't be ideologically driven, because their shareholders wouldn't stand for it.They go where the viewers are,no matter where that may be.Its about profits not politics.
With that being said, I think if its a good movie with a strong story and good writing,characters you empathize with, it will be a ratings success(the only success that truly matters). If its a crappy movie, hastily thrown together, with predicable dialog and a happy ending. It will fail in the marketplace, just as it should.

It would be intellectually dishonest of me to feel very differently about perceived "right-wing bias" than I do about perceived "left-wing bias".

Of course I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I hear your point ...
... and I would normally agree that it is a market-driven business.

However, we have seen the influence of this administration too often, especialy in the area of news coverage.

Networks are owned by corporations, and many of those corporations have huge contracts with government, especially defence contracts. They are not about to bite THAT particular hand that feeds them.

You are never going to see an in-depth news story about gas price gouging brought to you by Exxon. You are never going to see an expose about how much money got poured into the pockets of the pharmaceutical companies, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.

How much coverage did we see on the MSM news about the legal steps being taken in Ohio after the last presidential election? Judges heard legal motions, lawyers filed briefs on behalf of disenfanchised voters, groups filed lawsuits, poll station workers were put under oath to testify as to the irregularities they'd witnessed. Where was THIS on the MSM news?

I would think that when there are questions being asked, and legal steps being taken in the aftermath of a presidential election, THAT'S NEWS - regardless of whose 'side' your viewers might be on.

There is also the fact that the government is producing their own propaganda pieces, which are presented on TV and radio as 'news stories' -- that doesn't sound like an audience-driven idea to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
42. ttt
the thread title was also the same as 'Mystery' on PBS sunday night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
43. journalism has been jumped by serial hit pieces
I am wondering if ABC can be browbeaten into pulling this crap or if only organized GOP-generated form letters do the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
44. You are such an awesome writer...You need to start a magazine
Really, Democrat Monthly Review or something, you are awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zdux0013 Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
45.  yeah
yeah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC