Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My wife is now moving towards 'neutral' on *

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:39 PM
Original message
My wife is now moving towards 'neutral' on *
She told me over dinner tonight. She said the Valerie Plame "witch hunt" (her words) into * "pissed her off" (again, her words) I'm wondering how this is affecting other 'middle of the road' females?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. My husband was just starting to think... then he started saying see
look what Bush is doing for the gas prices... se he's taking care of us. I actually told him that 2.50 isn't exactly "cheap"... but then he said "well you can't expect everything to stay the same price every year with inflation and all"... then I asked him, if that's true, why are those big t.v.'s he drools over dropping their price, why haven't I had a raise in a yr in 1/2. why is he only receiving a standard 3% raise every year. Why are we working 60hr weeks to make pay for a 2 bedroom apt. with a drunk above us (who stomps all over the house all night and all day long, and a new strange one downstairs... my husband thinks they are on heavy drugs.) And supposedly I live in the good part of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow. Lots of brilliant spouses around. Obviously your wife has no
concept of the significance of Valerie Plame and the outing of an undercover operative tracking WMDs during time of war. This person is not 'middle of the road' in anyones book...koolaid swilling, maybe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. leesa
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 10:15 PM by Sam Odom
Not everyone (most aren't) DUers. The way the press presented the latest on 'Plamegate' appears to give bushco a pass and to some that he was persecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer99 Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The sheeple are just too damn stupid to put two and two
together....they let Bushco do the thinking for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. That's why it's important to keep communicating
If we're not talking to "the sheeple," who is? And if we're not supplying them with information (and it doesn't have to be a ton of stuff, just a few bricks here and there), who's telling them how to view events?

The good news is that once you begin effecting that change in someone's outlook, it's very difficult for them to go back to the perception they had. Odom's wife moving to "neutral" on President Simpleton is the long, difficult part of the journey. She's less likely to think up excuses for him when he fucks up (and we know for a fact his next fuck-up is just a live microphone away) and more likely to see his fuck-up as a fuck-up. And when someone starts seeing Simpleton that way, pretty soon they're bringing you news of his latest fuck-up instead of vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bush is hardly being persecuted
Perhaps you could explain to your wife that Bush made a decision to appoint Armitage as Deputy Secretary of State - a former Vietnam-era covert operative and Contra-era figure, who was previously investigated by President Reagan's Commission on Organized Crime (1984) for alleged links to gambling and prostitution, and was denied a 1989 appointment as Assistant Secretary of State because of links to Iran-Contra and other scandals.

As someone who's worked in intelligence, I'd like to draw your attention here to the fact that Armitage himself was a covert operative. What are the odds he accidentally mentioned someone else's covert status due to his gossipy nature, without realizing the impact? Twice?

Guess what happens when you appoint organized crime dudes with a history of corruption to key positions in the administration? It's not the sort of appointment you make because you believe in happy rainbows and unicorns and think the person's likely rehabilitated themself and you want to help them turn over a new leaf. When you appoint people with a history of corruption to those sorts of offices, it's because you plan on engaging in a bit of corruption yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes it is okay to disclose confidential material (secrets) if it is done
in an off hand manner I guess. As long as they say there was no malice intended it is just fine to disclose government secrets. Is that the message your wife is getting and is comfortable with? The Bush* Adminstration should not be held accountable because they now say they did it but not to be mean... Remember the State Dept is part of the Administration. Armitage is an important member of PNAC and not a stupid person. He told several reporters in an "Off hand" sort of way government secrets. What would happen to your wife if she did that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You mean..
... if it is characterized as being done in an offhand manner and folks with brains the size of peas buy that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. i said you republicans to husband last night about something
my husband got a huge smile and said, you cant say that to me anymore. i am not a republican anymore. i voted for kerry in 2004. like that won the argument, wink.

not all spouses. some opened their eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC