Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We survived 40 years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 07:57 PM
Original message
We survived 40 years
with Castro in power. How many times did we 'almost' invade because we thought he was a threat to southern USA? Have we forgotten Operation Northwoods.

quote.......
Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro as part of the U.S. government's Operation Mongoose anti-Castro initiative. The plan, which was not implemented, called for various false flag actions, including simulated or real state sponsored terrorism (such as hijacked planes) on U.S. and Cuban soil. The plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders, including the highest ranking member of the U.S. military, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer.

end quote.......
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Castro hasn't done anyone any favours by running government for
40 years. Nobody should be in that long. 8 years max should be a UN requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. guess that goes for FDR as well?.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, I support the 22nd
I wouldn't have wanted Clinton for a 3rd term either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. well, i oppose the 22nd Amendment...
...don't people have a right to be represented by anyone they like for as long as they can get elected? Isn't that what 'democracy' is all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. WOW! I'll start a new thread
I have never met anyone that wants the 22nd repealed. We fought King George many years ago. Maybe if we had a well informed electorate and HONEST elections, I'd reconsider. I hate that Congress goes back with a 98% pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. As H.L. Menckin wrote...
...American democracy is based on the idea that the people know what they want, and deserve to get it--GOOD AND HARD. I don't particularly like the idea that 98%+ of congress-critters get re-elected either (a retention rate higher than the Soviet Politboro back in the day), but you can thank liberal democrats as much as conservative republicans for gerrymandering the country into non-competitive, incumbent-for-life fiefdoms; and corporate/ideological special interests for giving them the money to buy their seats; and a 'horse-race' obsessed M$M that reports in a fashion which keeps the status quo in place. Personally, i seriously doubt that term limits of any kind will improve the quality of representation; engaging the public in electoral activism, on real issues instead of media-constructed personalities, will, regardless of the laws that regulate these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Your heart in the right place
but I live in reality with a populous that doesn't know who the VP is or where the Pacific Ocean is. I'll take term limits. Did you forget that California ( the most liberal state in the Union) voted for the Terminator.While petitioning people have told me that they were given $5 to NOT VOTE!We would have Queen/King for a Day. It would be one huge popularity contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. After awhile they stop worring about us and start working to hold power.
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 08:15 PM by Democrats_win
They've been talking about this in Zimbabwe where that terrible leader is the poster-child for term limits. But look at Bush, he never worked for the American people. Clinton, 12 years would have been nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Even Clinton was tired after
8 years. If a tough job. Every President ages terribly after 8 years. I agree that EVEN with a election they do what they want, not what WE want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. And by looking around for something to do - Clinton (genius, leader,
thinker, statesman) may end up doing more good for the world in his current incarnation. Look at Jimmy Carter.

Roosevelt was a special case. But then so was Stalin. There should be limits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Young, elder statesmen can do
so much good for humanity. That is why Gore will not run again. We need him where he is to save the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's not the point
Now you sound like *. It's not for us to say how long a leader stays in power. The point is he hasn't been a threat to the US in 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. No. But the economy is crap and that has been a threat to the cuban
people themselves for 30 years. Hey - I'm from Canada. We did well to build a nation that tried to keep most of the resources to ourselves for a long time. Where locals made profit And re-invested into the economy. Labour did okay at the end there... last half of the 20th Century. Exactly the time when Castro was in power.

Castro could have reformed and then left office. Then let other people with other ideas try there hand at trade or business or socialism.

Tanzania tried socialism really hard. With lots of good governance.. and after 20 years they realized it alone didn't work. That some form of market economy is needed. They came to that conclusion 20 years ago. They are doing okay now... save for epidemics. The mix is always the way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Your leaders are selling you down the river
with * with the North American Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. On page one of the "Union" document they mention compassion of
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 11:04 PM by applegrove
sorts. Then it doesn't occur anywhere else in the document. What type of opening paragraph is that?:shrug: A neocon one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Have you been following
what is happening with the NAU? I have an alert on google if you want more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I printed off one document and it made me want to weep. So I gave
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 12:22 PM by applegrove
up my critique. That document is currently in a city dump somewhere, or perhaps has been turned into toilet paper....where it belongs.

What got me was the narrative they ran throughout the document. "Give us credit for any job improvement when we do the UNION. Give us credit for any economic improvement when we do the UNION. Give us credit for our obvious success in instituting policies that will improve the economy for all. Give us credit for that in the future".

Well - seeing as how demographics mean that it will be an employees market in 5 years when the boomers start to retire... full employment is a given. So I would tend not to give credit to the UNIONists (sic) who want credit for that.

Reminds me of Regan taking credit for the fall of the Soviet Union..when the Soviets were willing to discuss peace and falling in the mid 1970s (economics were not working out cause communism just sucks). Or Gulianni taking credit for the fall in the crime rate in the early 1990s..when that was demographics too.

I look forward to the great employees market of 2011. Directly related to the baby boom of 1945 to 1965. And I will not give credit to the people who wrote the NAU document. Cause that is just crap/myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Found it. Have you looked into the NAU? Cause I'm afraid a pineapple
corporations will move up north.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. We can't even reach global consensus yet...
...on whether women should be considered 'people'.

I think that expecting a global term limit for leaders would be expecting a lot. At this stage, UN requirements like that would only be used as a tool by the powerful against the powerless (the way the NPT often is, for example).

Not that I disagree in theory. But it won't happen (at least not in a good way) for quite a while... To get there (and have it mean something), we'd need to agree (as a planet) on more basic things first, like baseline acceptable levels of human rights, proscribed environmental effects, etc... Any day now, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Castro will never be forgiven for throwing United Fruit & so on
out on their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Is that a reson to blow
up his country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's longest grudge in American history.
The hostility with Cuba can be traced back to the day when Castro expropriated their land & threw them out. It's been nothing but punishment ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. And I think he had every right to do so. Corporations are not
gods. We should all be able to bash them into dirt whenever they step out of line.

Sorry about the tangent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. OMG,That is scary! I hope they don't do a Black Op. like that again
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 08:27 PM by DianaForRussFeingold
I hope they know we will demand an investigation next time! "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." -
-- Abraham Lincoln

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Operation Northwoods was implimented on September 11, 2001
...with some slight alterations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC