Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Caring more about spin than the troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobcatJH Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 07:53 AM
Original message
Caring more about spin than the troops
Let me get something straight. The White House that has released bad news when no one was paying attention, that has packaged official government releases as news stories, that has paid for stories at home and abroad that push their agenda, that has planted reporters in the press corps to ask softball questions, that may very well have spied on journalists and that seems more adept at fighting a war with the media than in the Middle East - that White House is now telling us that their latest push with Iraq has nothing to do with politics? Explain this, then:
U.S. military leaders in Baghdad have put out for bid a two-year, $20 million public relations contract that calls for extensive monitoring of U.S. and Middle Eastern media in an effort to promote more positive coverage of news from Iraq.

The contract calls for assembling a database of selected news stories and assessing their tone as part of a program to provide "public relations products" that would improve coverage of the military command's performance, according to a statement of work attached to the proposal.

The request for bids comes at a time when Bush administration officials are publicly criticizing media coverage of the war in Iraq.

The proposal, which calls in part for extensive monitoring and analysis of Iraqi, Middle Eastern and American media, is designed to help the coalition forces understand "the communications environment." Its goal is to "develop communication strategies and tactics, identify opportunities, and execute events ... to effectively communicate Iraqi government and coalition's goals, and build support among our strategic audiences in achieving these goals," according to the statement of work that is publicly available through the Web site http://www.fbodaily.com.

A public relations practitioner who asked for anonymity because he may be involved in a bid on the contract said that military commanders "are overwhelmed by the media out there and are trying to understand how to get their information out.

"They want it to be received by audiences as it is transmitted , but they don't like how it turns out," he said. As an example, he said, there are complaints that reports from Iraq sometimes quote Shiite cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr more than military commanders.

The proposal calls for monitoring "Iraqi, pan-Arabic, international and U.S. national and regional markets media in both Arabic and English." That includes broadcast and cable television outlets, the Pentagon channel, two wire services and three major U.S. newspapers: The Washington Post, New York Times and Los Angeles Times.

Monitors are to select stories that deal with specific issues, such as security, reconstruction activities, "high profile" coalition force activities and events in which Iraqi security forces are "in the lead." The monitors are to analyze stories to determine the "dissemination of key themes and messages" along with whether the "tone" is positive, neutral or negative.

The media outlets would be monitored for how they present coalition or anti-Iraqi force operations. That part of the proposal could reflect Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's often-stated concern that the media does not cover positive aspects of Iraq.
Let that sink in for a moment. This administration would like to spend $20 million to look for good news that's simply not there. Donald Rumsfeld, who couldn't even be bothered to personally sign the condolence letters sent to the families of our fallen soldiers and who joked about the lack of proper equipment in Iraq, would rather force-feed you lies than look after his own troops. $20 million at a time when Congress seems poised to cut spending on researching and treating traumatic brain injuries - the signature injury of this war - from $14 million to $7 million. Again, let that sink in: The Republicans seem fine with the fact that they'd prefer to spend nearly three times as much money on needless spin than they would treating the traumatic brain injuries suffered by our troops. If you ask me, there's simply no positive way to spin that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Always being force fed by a media out to get us
<<U.S. military leaders in Baghdad have put out for bid a two-year, $20 million public relations contract that calls for extensive monitoring of U.S. and Middle Eastern media in an effort to promote more positive coverage of news from Iraq.

Shame they need to spend the 20 million.They have been using American media to serve up the drivel here in the States for free for at least ten years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. If only we could get rid of all those "photographs" and "videos"
and that damned "math" and all those "words."

Blame it on the media.

News and commentary, left to right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mongo1021 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. But we already have miltiary public affairs
What angers me is that the military already has trained, dedicated public affairs people in virtually every major unit. But I guess these people are trained to give out the truth, regardelss of spin. That is not what the white house is looking for. This is a complete waste of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hi Mongo1021!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. 36% of the people in the usa buy this shit
the rest of us can smell the stench of the rotting corpse of the whitehouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Tina Fey put it like this:
67% of the American people disapprove of the president.

The other 33% think Jesus rode to church on a dinosaur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Military Intelligence?
How bout another oxymoron of sorts? Bush Administration - Truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tonight's report from Iraq brought to you by Smilex
Love that Joker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Belmontvedere Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. 2 years....just long enough for Bush to save face
However, even with the best efforts of the Bush administration to paint a rosy picture of Iraq, this guy is going to leave office in shame (for a number of reasons, but Iraq will top the list). The next two years will only solidify this as a consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. TWOThumbs Up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Three if I had them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. The worse things become, the stronger his allegiance to "the mission"
The evidence of total failure is damning, but not to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC