Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore attacks media consolidation ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:14 PM
Original message
Gore attacks media consolidation ...
Edited on Sun Aug-27-06 11:46 PM by welshTerrier2
i like Al Gore ... i like "the new Al Gore" even more ... you kind of get the feeling with Gore that he finally feels like the choke collar of political consultants has been removed from around his neck ...

while i've been somewhat disappointed with Gore's vague comments about withdrawal from Iraq, i find a sort of refreshing honesty and integrity when i listen to him ... i don't feel that way about too many others ...

Gore broadened his well known environmental message on Sunday when he railed against the evils of an overly centralized media ... like many other elements of increasingly consolidated power, shrinking diversity in our MSM is eroding our democracy ... and now, there are dark clouds appearing on the horizon that the internet may be the next target of those who want to keep the public in the dark and isolated from each other ...

Gore's focus on fundamental democracy is an issue that all Democrats would be wise to address ...


source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060828/ap_on_re_eu/britain_gore

Former Vice President Al Gore said Sunday ever-tighter political and economic control of the media is a major threat to democracy. <skip>

"Democracy is under attack," Gore told an audience at the Edinburgh International Television Festival. "Democracy as a system for self-governance is facing more serious challenges now than it has faced for a long time.

"Democracy is a conversation, and the most important role of the media is to facilitate that conversation of democracy. Now the conversation is more controlled, it is more centralized."

He said that in many countries, media control was being consolidated in the hands of a few businesspeople or politicians. <skip>

In the United States "the only thing that matters in American politics now is having enough money to put 30-second commercials on the air often enough to convince the voters to elect you or re-elect you," he said. "The person who has the most money to run the most ads usually wins." <skip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gore was also a Vietnam veteran who served
Unlike W. Our country and the world would be far better off if Gore had become president in 2000.

Instead we got some frat brat with cowboy boots and a hat who wanted to send our kids to rule the world for his big business buds.

More Americans voted for Gore than the frat brat. We should never forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. One reservation about Gore
He shilled pretty heavily for NAFTA, and his debate against Perot in 1993 contributed to losing ocntrol of Congress in 1994. Has he changed his mind on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. We lost in 1994 because the change in political affiliation, in the
South, finally switched yellow dog democrat to republican...

Record number of democrats choose no to run for reelection that year....

And what had been rending heavily republican was realized when a powerful incumbent democrat no longer stood in the way of the republican party....

The same is happening in 2006...

Only Rockefeller republicans are now this close to joining the democratic party once and for all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Perot supported NAFTA policies and Gore was calling him out on it
NAFTA was a double edged sword in the 1990's. It did contribute to the booming economy under the Clinton-Gore Admin but it also fueled the off-shoring trend. As president, Gore was going to address this and enforce the labor and environmental standards that were part of NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Perot didn't support NAFTA. Just the opposite. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Gore praised Rush Limbaugh in that debate
--according to Greg Palast. It was Perot who warned about the "giant sucking sound" of jobs moving offshore. NAFTA helped nobody except the upper 5%. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Actually Perot had his own private NAFTA
a exclusive zone set up through his corporation to import duty free and Al was calling him on his hypocrisy and stated during their debate that if was good enough for Perot, why was it not good enough for the rest of the nation. If this had been a fight they would have called it in the first round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whatever one feels about Gore as a candidate... can we at least agree
that he's correct about the media? These threads always get bogged down with a person's past/present/future "candidacy", rather than dealing with the subject matter -- the issue -- addressed in the OP.

Media Consolidation has shown itself to be one of the most powerful tools used by the Republican Party to keep the Bush administration in power. We need to realize and acknowledge that, and do everything we can to start breaking up the monopolies, if we are ever going to see anything resembling the REAL NEWS on the media again.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. The media
seems to be controlled by the Fox Master himself Rupert Murdoch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good deal, now MORE Democrats need to wake up to the REAL problems
the party faces - the corporate MEDIA that will not let their message and their issues get a fair hearing with the general public.

When are the Dem STRATEGISTS gonna wake up and smell the coffee?

Dems don't have to move right, they just need a media that extends a fair microphone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. how did Republicans win control of Congress?
who cares if media coverage was biased against Carter, Dukakis, and Mondale?..Republicans convinced the public in 1994 that the media is entirely controlled by a small group of elitist liberals! They convinced the public that 9/11 was the media's fault..and that the media loves big government and hates the free market. :eyes:

The Democrats cannot remain silent if they want to win back Congress! The media is the heart and soul of big government, deficit spending, corporate welfare, crooked politics, and turning a blind eye to Bush's failure to stop 9/11. But who cares?

why should the taxpaying voters expect the commander-in-chief of the largest military in the world to defend us from a rogue group of terrorists, who once were funded by the Reagan adminstration?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's dead right on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. Strange. I was just thinking someone needed to get on this again.
Thanks, President Gore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC