Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATE–Bush Administration Backs Northwest Against Flight Attendants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:12 PM
Original message
UPDATE–Bush Administration Backs Northwest Against Flight Attendants

FULL article: http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/08/25/bush-administration-backs-northwest-against-flight-attendants/

UPDATE–Bush Administration Backs Northwest Against Flight Attendants

Just in. A federal judge ruled this afternoon that Northwest Airlines flight attendants cannot begin their planned series of unannounced strikes against the airline. The judge granted a temporary injunction sought by the Bush administration and Northwest against the Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA). A final decision may come next week.

Mollie Reiley, president of the Northwest AFA-CWA unit says:

Management and the courts can stall us, but they cannot defeat us. Our crusade to protect our careers has only begun. We will continue to fight for Northwest flight attendants and all flight attendants who will walk in our footsteps.

The Bush administration is asking a federal judge to take away the right of Northwest Airlines flight attendants to strike the airline after the attendants have twice rejected contracts in which management demanded $195 million in concessions.

Both the U.S. Department of Justice and the airline are seeking to reverse an Aug. 17 decision by the federal court that upheld the right to strike by members of the Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA). Northwest and the Justice Department appealed the bankruptcy court decision to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. A decision is expected later today.

AFA-CWA had planned to implement its CHAOS™ (Create Havoc Around Our System™) strategy of targeted work actions using random, unannounced strikes Aug. 15. But following recent heightened security levels at airports, the union delayed any possible action until tonight.

The rejected deals included cuts of up to 40 percent in pay and changes in work rules, along with the requirement that flight attendants spend 25 percent more time at work than under their previous contract.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well there is a shock!
A Republican Administration not supporting labor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. deregulation did wonders for the airlines didn`t it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Um, since WHEN
does anyone not paid by the federal government NOT have the right to strike?

News to me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Gore v. Bush 1980
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC