Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT - Neo-Cons Pissed at CIA for not justifying immed. Iran Bombing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:26 PM
Original message
NYT - Neo-Cons Pissed at CIA for not justifying immed. Iran Bombing
The NYT Is reporting that this band of thieves including Kristol and rest of the PNAC lunatics are now starting to apply pressure for our intelligence community to "find" the evidence of what they already "know."

What do these geniuses "know?" That Iran may already be in possession of nuclear bombs and assorted WMD, ,and they are just itching to use them on Israel and the U.S. Is any of this starting to sound familiar? Maybe they are just so embarrassed that day of Armageddon they predicted (08/22/2006) passed without Iran launching missiles at Israel, thus starting World War III, and the second coming of Christ. I imagine they are now thinking, "well God made us look bad by not obliging with "the beginning of the end,' so I guess we'll just have to force his hand.

Read the full NYT story at the link below. WE MUST TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY FROM THE NEO-CON CABAL.


Neo-Cons Expressing outrage that the CIA and others aren't manufacturing the "right" intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. well after all, we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud....
I mean, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Eggzackly
Naive morans :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. The senior command at the Pentagon has told them "NO!"
because they know damned full well that any bombing would result in the Iranian troops that have been at the border for over two years crossing over that border into Iraq and joining the Shi'ite majority in obliterating our military there.

The neocons need to sit down and shut up or drop dead of strokes. Their choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh, let me choose!
Please! Please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. It won't be so easy this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlavaKreemSnak Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do they really need all that to attack Iran?

They can just say that Iran is hiding all of the evidence but we know they are anti-American and also anti-Israel because that guy with the really long name that is their president keeps saying so every time he opens his mouth. And also there are all these Iranians who were friends with the shah that got asylum here who really want Iran to be liberated so they can have an election that will elect a pro-American leader, and that Iran is backing Hezbollah and is Al Qaeda and so bringing democracy to them is a big part of the war on terror etc etc.

Plus there are lots of articles saying that the whole Lebanon thing was to help prepare to attack Iran and some others saying that Iran is already attacking the part of Iraq with Kurds in it so maybe this time it won't be like this sudden thing but a more gradual one that people call "mission creep."

But if we decide to attack it who is going to stop us, whether we have any evidence like yellow cake or something or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC