Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: The Democrats are Wrong on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
timontheleft Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 09:57 PM
Original message
Bush: The Democrats are Wrong on Iraq
The Democrats are wrong on Iraq. That’s what you told me today in your speech. Hearing about the state of things over there at the moment leaves me wondering if I should believe you.

Let’s see, I was told that Saddam had ties to al Qaeda, but that turned out not to be true. I was told that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but that wasn’t true either. I was told that terrorists were being trained in Iraq, that wasn’t true (not when I first heard about it anyway). I was told that Iraqis would welcome our soldiers (with flowers!), but that didn’t happen.

I was then told “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq, but today you said that we should stay until the job is done. I’ve been told that if we stay and fight in Iraq the terrorists would be so busy fighting us there that we won’t need to worry about fighting terrorists here. I guess that doesn’t apply to the good folks in London – how much longer until it doesn’t apply here either?

We were told that we had turned a corner when Saddam was captured, when Iraq held their first elections, when Al-Zarqawi was killed, and at other times I’m sure. I can’t really remember them all; I’ve gotten dizzy going around all these corners.

I’ve been told that everyone is either “with us or against us”; why has no one other than Mr. Blair chosen to stand with us? We won’t even get into all the things I was told about serving justice to Osama bin Laden. I was told the Taliban had been destroyed, but it seems we must’ve missed a few somewhere.

I was told we wouldn’t get into “nation building”; you left out the part about making exceptions for countries that have something to offer the big oil companies. I was told all about “compassionate conservatism”. When does the compassionate part start? I was told you are a “uniter not a divider”; that seems to be at least partially true. Look how you’ve managed to unite the entire world against us.

So, the Democrats are wrong on Iraq? You say if we leave that it “would be a huge mistake.” Granted you are an expert on huge mistakes, but given your track record I think I’ll listen to the Democrats.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least Bush was right about one thing
We're going to be in Iraq as long as he's president. All the more reason to impeach his ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. SOB is one main reason the world hates us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush was and IS wrong on Iraq......
:wtf: does he really think he's fooling anyone with his tired mumbo jumbo?

Opened up the largest Pandora's box there was to open.....to a point that there is no easy answer for the U.S.....cause no matter what, we are the losers in this.

Dummy Asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Awesome enumerations. K&R. And--
Edited on Mon Aug-21-06 10:27 PM by chill_wind
here's an essay much in that vein you might also appreciate. Long but powerfully iterated summary.

In the long ago words of James Carville, we're right, they're wrong and here's why.


What I Heard about Iraq

Eliot Weinberger

In 1992, a year after the first Gulf War, I heard Dick Cheney, then secretary of defense, say that the US had been wise not to invade Baghdad and get ‘bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq’. I heard him say: ‘The question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is: not that damned many.’

In February 2001, I heard Colin Powell say that Saddam Hussein ‘has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours.’

That same month, I heard that a CIA report stated: ‘We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its weapons of mass destruction programmes.’

In July 2001, I heard Condoleezza Rice say: ‘We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt.’

On 11 September 2001, six hours after the attacks, I heard that Donald Rumsfeld said that it might be an opportunity to ‘hit’ Iraq. I heard that he said: ‘Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.’

much more: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/wein01_.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timontheleft Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks . . .
and thanks for the article. That's quite a list of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. nice try, Junior
American are dumb, but not that dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvarezadams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Should be sent
as letter to the editor of as many papers as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sknabt Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. The definition of insanity is...
... trying the same thing over and over and over again while expecting different results.

Like Bush preaching "stay the course" in Iraq. Yeah, if we remain addicted to the failures of the past over there we are assured success in the future. Makes perfect sense. Or was that nonsense?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Welcome to DU!
My its busy here in the GDP forum tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC