Cheney pulls that "We'll get hit again if the Dems win" crap AGAIN

[Human Torch]

Cheney: 'No guarantee we won't be hit again'

RAW STORY
Published: Thursday August 17, 2006

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Cheney_No_guarantee_we_wont_be_0817.html

Vice President Dick Cheney blasted Democrats for not supporting the war in Iraq, and said Montanans need to re-elect Republican Sen. Conrad Burns to make sure the administration can carry out its wartime plans.

The vice president, speaking at a fundraiser for Burns on Wednesday, said the administration is sticking by its plan to stay in Iraq as long as it takes to make sure the country is stable. He said it would be wrong to set deadlines for withdrawing troops.

Burns supporters could pay $2,100 to attend a reception before the lunch and get a photo with the vice president. A $5,000 donation allowed a photo with Cheney and some fly fishing with Burns.

‘‘Here in the U.S. we have not had another 9-11,’’ the vice president said. ‘‘No one can guarantee we will not be hit again. But the relative safety in recent years is not an accident.’’

[smtpgirl]

1. So, if you don't support the Republican Party

or Conrad Burns (MT), we will get hit again from a 'terrist strike?

That is so old, can't dead-eye get a new mantra?

At least I can respect my father, he does have other views.

My dad could wrap circles with 'ole dead-eye.

A progressive Dem at 70

[C_U_L8R]

2. If you're dumb enough to

pay two grand for lunch with crashcart
you're dumb enough to believe anything

[babylonsister]

3. He's so disingenuous; he sounds like an old, broken record,

and I don't think many people are buying it.

[smtpgirl]

7. and to fly-fish with Burns & Cheney is $5000!!

I'd rather spend my $ on my 401k, pay my car off, or give it to my parents, not those losers

SO WHERE IS MARY CHENEY???

I guess she is in hiding

[babylonsister]

13. Well, they've fattened a lot of wallets out there; $5000 is a drop

in the bucket for some of these people. If I can keep my disdain because I'm not wealthy, I'll embrace that!

[Punkingal]

4. What an absolute piece of s*** he is!

I wonder what he would say if we got struck tomorrow. Oh well, it was an accident???????

[OwnedByFerrets]

20. He would blame it on Democrats.

Im not sure how, but they would find a lie to use.

[Olney Blue]

5. Predictable and boring.

[TheCowsCameHome]

6. I am so sick of this bald-headed prick and his scare tactics.

Imagine paying money to have your picture taken with this demented old fool, unless maybe you want to stick it to your doormat.

[smtpgirl]

9. The doormat would better

[smtpgirl]

10. The doormat would better

[Sparkly]

8. WAY beyond the limits of sane political discourse..... Sickening.

[rsmith6621]

11. When Does He Resign???????

A Guy with a booth at Seattle Tacoma Int. Airport said Cheney will resign.....WHEN?????

[DinahMoeHum]

12. Hey, Cheney! Neah neah-neah neah neah. . .

n/t

[napi21]

14. Well Mr Chenbey, we were never hit before YOU and your

cohorts incrime obtained power, now were we?????

We haven't been hit since???? What about the anthrax letters? What about the Ah's in Va area who were just shooting people because it was fun?

Terrorists are not only from the middle east, and all your hate mongering doesn't make anyone safer, it simply makes more people hate our Gov't...both domestic and foreign haters!!

[whistle]

15. Not if we impeach Cheney's and Bush's asses and put them away

...for life behind bars Guitmo style

[movonne]

16. The meaning is "we might go to jail if the Dem's win" ...

[cboy4]

17. I'm more afraid of Cheney than the terra-rissssses

[babylonsister]

18. That graphic is hysterical! I can't even pick a favorite, they're all

great! :rofl:

[cboy4]

19. I know, it's pretty funny, ha?

;)

[4nic8em]

21. He

must be talking about that "anthranx" adventure after 9/11 that the monkster-in-chief so sucessfully "protected" us from.

[rodeodance]

22. Hatch said about the same thing today.

[gully]

23. Was "safety" an accident when Clinton was President?

eom

[dflprincess]

24. I'm guessing this is a promise, not a threat

n/t