Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Embrace "Democrat Party?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:40 PM
Original message
Poll question: Embrace "Democrat Party?"
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 08:41 PM by gulliver
Until recently, it really irked me to hear one of the Republicans' spokespeople call us the "Democrat Party" on TV. Now I am starting to see it as something we can use against them. Is it too early? Am I just wrong? I've heard it so often that I think of it as a set-up for a comeback more than a clever put-down.

We're the Democratic Party. Some people like to call us the "Democrat Party." Fine. Join us in the "Democrat Party." Donuts, bagels, and coffee are over there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. Who gives a shit what they call it as long as they vote for the
candidates? Nitpicking will just annoy them.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Proved: "Democratic" people see them as warm & cuddly "Democrat" seen as
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 02:45 PM by LaPera
bloated, big spenders... Republican Frank Luntz, do a Google search on him...Then you'll understand how important defining a single word is. http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001208.php#1208

There is a reason all republicans have been told to use the word Democrat, (even though it's poor grammar) instead of using the correct word, democratic.

They've researched it, and it's true and that's why they are ALL using the word Democrat, it NOT by accident...even if it's so out of place...such as if we said the "Republic Party".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. THE REPUBLIKLAN PARTY
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 05:24 PM by liberaldemocrat7
Whenever someone uses the name the Democrat party, you call their party the REPUBLIKLAN Party.

They will eventually have to stop slurring the name of our party.

The party of Lincoln has turned into the party of George Lincoln Rockwell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never let them get away with it.
All Democrats should point out when media people are behaving in a "grammatically challenged" fashion. If we accept it, we're just accepting our own marginalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. True. And I take deep offense to the idea of using THEIR terminology
to describe ourselves. I'd recommend that - EVERY TIME you come up against this - somebody referring to the "Democrat Party" then turn it around and ask them about the "republic Party."

Hit 'em back - and hit 'em back HARD. If they object to the word-botching of their title, I'd say - "I'll use what you say is your party's proper name WHEN YOU DO LIKEWISE WITH MY PARTY. WHICH IS - THE DEMOCRATIC Party. When YOU get it "right," SO WILL I." Tit for tat. Taste of their own medicine. Whatever they do to me, I intend to do straight back at them - and on steroids. I stop when they do. And not until, or unless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. How does it marginalize us?
In what way is the word "Democrat" an act of marginalization? I don't see it. It only bothers you if you let it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. "The good guys" by any other name are still as righteous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. We should re-take possession of that word
Just as Republicans embraced the label of being part of the "vast right wing conspiracy". It's no longer an epithet because the Right has taken possession of that terminology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's poor grammar.
Anyone who uses "Democrat Party," intending it to be a clever and not-so-subtle slur, sounds like an uneducated moron, and a petty, childish one at that.

Not that I talk to many people who would ever say "Democrat Party," but whenever I do hear it said, I immediately make the correction and point out that it's poor grammar and reflects poorly on the mental acumen of the one who said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Right. It's a noun used in place of an adjective.
Whereas "Republican" is both a noun and an adjective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yup.
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 09:40 PM by silverweb
But can you imagine the reaction if any of us started referring to the Republican Party, where the word is an adjective, as the "Republic Party"?

They'd be falling all over themselves ridiculing anyone who said that, but it's the exact equivalent of what they're saying with "Democrat Party."

On edit: Grammatical correction... LOL :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's an attempt by Repugs to emasculate Democrats
if they are sissy enough to object.



"Republic Party" would be the equivalent bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. If my beloved aunt Betty says something about the Democrat party
I'll let it slide. But if a pundit says it, the response is, "I'm surprised you don't know this, considering how many years you've been in journalism. But actually we're the Democratic party."

I didn't think too much about it, until on one of today's interviews with Lamont, the interviewer kept calling it the Democrat party. But then, as soon as he mentioned Lieberman, it was suddenly the Democratic party. Hmmmm, I thought. There's something there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just call them the "Republ Party"
When they say you're missing part of their name, tell them they're doing the same to us.

On a serious note though, I've seen this go overboard the other way too. I hear a lot of people call Democrats "Democratics." Which is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm with you...I often refer to 'Repubs' in conversation with RWers who
insist on saying 'Democrat' party.
They change their tune (or FLIP FLOP) pretty quickly.
Fuckers. Total flops, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Agreed.
Although my personal preference is to call them "reTHUGs," as it more accurately describes them.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. *lol* I have been known to refer to them as rePigs, so I'm with ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Rethugs, Repigs, Repukes.
All of those work. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. "Publicans" -- it's a Bible word, too
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. REPUKE party.
More to the point and has imagined visual baggage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Embrace illiteracy? Embrace bully tactics? Embrace anti-intellectualism?
Embrace dumbing down? :thumbsdown:

Hey it takes backbone to call their bluff on this one. WHAT A LOAD OF HORSECRAP. "Framing" :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. We do not allow them to define us. They've been winning the war
of language for far too many years now. We cannot allow them to continue to define all the terms. Words have meanings, words convey ideas, and words are all we have to convey the message.

We are Democrats; our party, the Democratic Party. Any other usage belittles it, and us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. My take: this isn't about grammar, but about fear! Repub fear!
Repubs don't want to (can't) go all the way (add the last syllable) because they don't want to associate Democrats with democracy (which Bush claims he's spreading around the world, but actually destroying here at home):

democratic elections (free and fair elections)
democratically elected governments (by the people for the people)
Democratic Party (fighting to protect our Constitutional rights)

Hence: Democrat Party


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Exactly.
They're trying to take away the "Democratic" movement of the Democratic Party.

And, I always correct them. It's the Democratic Party. "Democrat" Party is just grammatically incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I prefer to let this one go by ....
Why haggle about this supposed epithet, and allow the other, real arguments to get stymied and ignored ? ..... frankly, the distinction is minimal .... the real problems, on the other hand, are monumental ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Except this is how Repugs slime Dems and "frame" media and public opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Are you honestly prepared to state ....
that the absence of two letters .... ic .... can cause the downfall of our message, our goals, our party ? ....

Cmon ....

Its only a problem if YOU are affected by it; if you arent affected by it, then it shoots by without anyone else even noting it .... Then you get to talk about matters of substance, instead of fighting about two measly little letters ....

Let's make 'Bob' be the Republican, and 'David' be the Democrat ....

Bob: "Well there David, I see that the Democrat Party is again pushing for an increase in the minimum wage .... DONT you folks in the Democrat party know how an increase in those wages will kill jobs in this country ? ...... Dont you care about unemployment ?"

David: "Well Bob ? ... We are of course promoting the cause of the lowest paid members of our society to obtain at LEAST a living wage, with which a full time job can provide for the minimum level of existence ..... We ALL know how much prices have been increasing in ALL sectors .... Isnt it only fair that the poor and low paid have the ability to increase their wages at LEAST to offset that inflation ?"

Now .... according to your scenario .... this is what David would say ....

David: "Bob ? .... what did you just say ? .... did YOU just call my party the DEMOCRAT Party ? .... Bob ? .... as you full-know: We are the DEMOCRATIC party .... not the DEMOCRAT Party ! .... How DARE you say we are the DEMOCRAT Party ! ..... how insulting ! .... How RUDE ! .... Well I never ! ..."

Notice how in my scenario: The presumed slight is completely ignored, and the issues that matter, in that case the increase of the minimum wage, are fully expressed and contended ... but in your insistence that such descriptions are 'framing' public opinion and are base insults, how the message becomes the description itself, and NOT any of the other more critical issues that we face ? ...

I swear: it is NOT an issue, unless you make it one ....

Now: After Bob starts guffawing at our complete non-response to his attempted insult, he says ....

Bob: "David ? .. I just called your party the DEMOCRAT Party .... and THATs what they are ... DEMOCRATS .... Arent you going to say something ? .....

David: "Bob ? ... we are discussing the minimum wage here, and other issues that matter to the american people, and YOU want to argue about two silly little letters ? .... Cmon Bob .. Get real here ... the american people DESERVE responsible answers to these questions, and they deserve reasonable solutions .... Your adolescent insults degrade our national polity, and make you seem petty and out of touch ..... I intend to present REAL solutions, and move away from the ridiculous pranks you present as argument"

NEVER let them frame that issue: it ISNT an issue ..... force them to talk about REAL problems instead ..... they will lose every time .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. The statement stands on its own, pointing out the mechanism
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 09:07 AM by omega minimo
"Are you honestly prepared to state that the absence of two letters .... ic .... can cause the downfall of our message, our goals, our party ? "

And where you went with it is trying to put words in my mouth. No thank you.

"Its only a problem if YOU are affected by it; if you arent affected by it, then it shoots by without anyone else even noting it .... Then you get to talk about matters of substance, instead of fighting about two measly little letters ...."

The Repugs have the Dems balls in a vise. Either Dems ignore it and its a slap in the face every time (sounds like Democrap, is belligerent, hostile, macho mindfucking: "Yeah, we know it's incorrect and fucking stupid, whaddayagonnadoaboutit?") or they're prissy for pointing it out and making a big deal about it, because yes, there are other issues more pressing and spending any time on it is a waste.

The mindfuckers seem to keep winning at this toxic game.

"NEVER let them frame that issue: it ISNT an issue ..... force them to talk about REAL problems instead ..... they will lose every time ....."

As I said, this is HOW they "frame" the issue and slime Democrats. They will always win when it comes to dirty tricks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. Yawns ....
Hell .. even I have forgotten what your argument was ....

Where was I ? ... oh yeah ....

About that minimum wage .....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Subtlety eludes you
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 09:41 AM by omega minimo
The question was should we "embrace" "Democrat" party. I would say no. What would I do about it? Not what you assume. You'll never know.


You've got the argument and the "sides" all worked out ahead of time, so you do put words in someone's mouth if they say anything that isn't in lockstep with your prepared attitude. Odd. There are more than two tracks of thought, ideas b/w black and white.

As for "can't remember what your argument was" your condescension is also strange. Might have to tell you I couldn't slog through your little "scenario."

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. I have an argument ....
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 09:31 AM by Trajan
But its somehow lost with some in this world .....

The simple fact : You will never get to the core of the issues that we face if you focus on inane, supposed slights that have NO substance in relation to those issues ...

I am going to IGNORE the missing letters, and talk about the minimum wage, OR social security, OR public education ... etc .. instead of worrying about those two little letters .... It is ONLY an insult if you make it so .. it is otherwise an indication of their ignorance ....

You will be wasting your time talking about one single word ....

Shrugs .... your choice ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Poor Trajan
Maybe look at this as a discussion board rather than an argument board. :think:

I am not your generic DUer having your generic argument where you've worked out all the parts (talk about boring!)

I understand your point. And the solution is not either/or. Your assumptions are getting in your way.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is an old one
Since the days of Tail Gunner Joe McCarthy the Republicans have attempted to change our name.
You don't let the enemy name you.
Ignore it in person as this can and has led to fist fights.
Chew the sh*t out of media outlets that use the wrong name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Hot DAMN, that's the best wording I've seen all evening:
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 03:19 AM by calimary
"You don't let the enemy name you."

Holy COW, Cobalt-60, that's good!

And it's HUGELY spot-on. You DON'T let the enemy name you. It's BEYOND overstepping their bounds. You DON'T hand over that privilege. You don't let them set the terms, name the names, call the shots, run the game. If you do, you've already lost. Just who do they think they are, anyway? It is a subtle attempt to diminish us, to discount us, to devalue us, to make us less. It's the same as ASSHOLE going around bestowing nicknames on people. Subtle, but also a REAL insult. It's demeaning. It automatically and subconsciously places you in a subservient position. You're the dog. They're the master. Um... EXCUSE ME????? I DON'T THINK SO!!!

And NO, it's NOT nitpicking or trivial or "not worth fighting about." It IS very much worth fighting about. I am NOT their dog, their pet, their slave, their underling. They have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to determine what I and my party are to be called, or how we're to be referred. I and MY PARTY are the only ones to decide that.

You DON'T let the enemy name you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. NO. Words MEAN things.
They call us that for a REASON. THEIR reason.
And that's all I need to know.

"It is not necessary to determine why an enemy desires
any particular thing; the knowledge that he desires it
is, alone, sufficient reason to deny it to him."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. I prefer Democratic Party, but...
If someone says "Democrat" Party just out of ignorance and isn't trying to insult the party by intentionally misusing the term I don't have a problem with it. (In fact, if they vote for Democrats, more power to them!) But I still wouldn't really want to "embrace" using the term because for me it's forever going to be connected to the intentional misuse by Tom Delay and other wingnuts. It would just make me feel too slimy to truly embrace the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. I even heard Olbermann use it last week
Yes, Keith Olbermann said, for the world to hear, "the Democrat party".

A slip, I'm sure, but the real message I got was: we have to make this an issue. The word itself is utterly trivial, but the respect behind it is vital.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Allyoop Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Democrat/Democratic???
Am I the only one who got a mailing from Al Gore several months ago with a sticker inside that reads "Had Enough - vote Democrat 06"?

If it doesn't give Al the heebie jeebies - should I care? The Republicans used to be a (little d) democratic party. Everyone who votes in a (so-called) democratic election is a democrat - the name of the party IMHO is not something to get all hung up about. What we stand for and what our candidates will attempt to accomplish in our name is what's important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. No!!! When someone uses the term "democrat" party...
I automatically ask them what party they are referring to, since there is no such party as the "democrat" party. I force them to use the proper name, Democratic Party, or the conversation will continue no further. How would you think Kenny Mehlman would react if every time you talked to him you referred to his party as the Repukelican party, or Repugnantcan party.

Don't use Puke talking points!!!!! :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. We should call them the RepubliCYST party now!
If they want to try and make us out to be "rats" with their pronunciation, then it's fitting that we categorize them likewise as cysts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobcatJH Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. No fucking way we're the "Democrat Party"
Not at all. Not now, not never. Never, ever embrace their frame. They just don't want anyone associating our party with the word "democracy". To avoid that, they've tried to turn the word "democrat" into a pejorative, which it isn't. And we should never use phrases uttered by the likes of Karl Rove and Ken Mehlman. It would take a major step up from that bunch to even reach the status of being beneath our contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Because WORDS HAVE MEANING and when you allow them to
change the words, you give them the power to define you (is any of this sounding familiar, yet?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. I prefer party of the people
as opposed to the party of the corporations.

And instead of hick, I prefer Appalachian-American.

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. THE 14 WORDS REPUBLICANS TOLD NEVER TO USE!
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 03:21 PM by LaPera
http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001208.php#1208

"Democratic" is also a word never to be used by republicans.

1. Government - Washington

NEVER SAY: Government
INSTEAD SAY: Washington


The fact is, most Americans appreciate their local government that picks up their trash, cleans their streets, and provides police and transportation services. Washington is the problem. Remind voters again and again about Washington spending, Washington waste, Washington taxation, Washington bureaucracy, Washington rules and Washington regulations. Then remind voters that if Washington created this mess, it is

Washington’s responsibility to fix it. "If we expect to succee4 we must look to ourselves and not to Washington to raise our kids, start our businesses and improve our day-to-day lives." If you must talk about government, use the context defined by President Bush: "Government should help people improve their lives) not try to run their lives.

2. Privatization/Private Accounts - Personalization/Personal Accounts

NEVER SAY: Privatization/Private Accounts
INSTEAD SAY: Personalization/Personal Accounts


Many more Americans would "personalize" Social Security than "privatize" it. In fact, two-thirds of America want to personalize Social Security while only one-third would privatize it. Why? Personalizing Social Security suggests ownership and control over your retirement savings, while privatizing it suggests a profit motive and winners and losers, BANISH PRIVATIZATION FROM YOUR LEXICON.

3 Tax Reform - Tax Simplification

NEVER SAY: Tax Reform
INSTEAD SAY: Tax Simplification


While a majority of Americans are generally in favor of tax reform, one-third of the population fears that they would end up paying more in taxes if the tax code was in fact reformed. However, almost all Americans believe they would personally benefit from a tax code that was simplified -- in terms of money they owe, time they spend and anxiety about the IRS. When more Americans fear the IRS than root-canal surgery, something should be done to simplify the tax code.

4. Inheritance/Estate Tax - The Death Tax

NEVER SAY: Inheritance/Estate Tax
INSTEAD SAY: The Death Tax


While a sizeable 68% of America thinks the Inheritance/Estate Tax is unfair, fully 78% think that the Death Tax is unfair. And while a narrow majority would repeal the inheritance/estate tax, an overwhelming majority would repeal the death tax. If you want to kill the estate tax, call it a death tax.

5. A Global Economy/Globalization/Capitalism - Free Market Economy

NEVER SAY: Global Economy/Globalization/Capitalism
INSTEAD SAY: Free Market Economy


More Americans are afraid of the principle of globalization than even privatization. The reason? Globalization represents something big, something distant and something foreiwi. it.s the same reason why Americans like their local government but dislike Washington -- the closer you are, the more control you have. So instead of talking about the principles of globalization, instead emphasize "the value and benefits of a free market economy." Similarly, capitalism reminds people of harsh economic competition that yields losers as well as winners. Conversely, the free market economy provides opportunity to all and allows everyone to succeed.

6. Outsourcing - Taxation, Regulation, Litigation, Innovation, Education

NEVER SAY: Outsourcing
INSTEAD SAY: Taxation, Regulation, Litigation, Innovation, Education


When you use the words of your oppositions you are basically accepting their definition and therefore their conclusion. We should NEVER use the word outsourcing because we will then be asked to defend or end the practice of allowing companies to ship American jobs overseas. Rather, we should talk about the "root cause" why any company would not want to hire "the best workers in the world." And the answer: "over-taxation, over-regulation, too much litigation, and not enough innovation or quality education." Because it rhymes, it will be remembered.

7. Undocumented Workers - Illegal Aliens

NEVER SAY: Undocumented Workers
INSTEAD SAY: Illegal Aliens


The Dems have adopted the phrase "undocumented worker" but you shouldn’t. Call them exactly what they are. In fact, instead of addressing "immigration reform, "which polarizes Americans, you should be talking about "border security" issues. Securing our borders and our people has universal support.

8. Foreign Trade - International Trade

NEVER SAY: Foreign Trade
INSTEAD SAY: International Trade


For many reasons unrelated to this issue, the word "foreign" conjures up negative images. Americans simply don’t like "foreign oil," or "foreign products" or "foreign nationals." International is a more positive concept than either foreign or global.

9. Drilling for oil - Exploring for energy

NEVER SAY: Drilling for oil
INSTEAD SAY: Exploring for energy


It’s the picture people paint in their minds, the difference between an old-fashioned oilrig that gushes up black goop vs. 21st Century technology and innovation that provides us the ability to heat our homes and drive our cars. When you talk about energy, use words like "responsible" and "balanced" and always address your concern for the environment.

10. Tort Reform - Lawsuit Abuse Reform

NEVER SAY: Tort Reform
INSTEAD SAY: Lawsuit Abuse Reform


The term "tort" has very little meaning to the average American, and at best reminds one of a French pastry. "Lawsuit Abuse" is something most Americans understand and resent. If you really want to make your case, add the word "frivolous."

11. Trial Lawyer - Personal Injury Lawyer

NEVER SAY: Trial Lawyer
INSTEAD SAY: Personal Injury Lawyer


It is hard to distrust a trial lawyer because we see them portrayed so favorably on L.A. Law and Law & Order. But personal injury lawyers, also known as ambulance chasers, remind people of those annoying, harassing commercials we see at 1:00 am cajoling us to sue someone. If you want to get the frill bang for the buck, call them "predatory personal injury lawyers."

12. Corporate Transparency - Corporate Accountability

NEVER SAY: Corporate Transparency
INSTEAD SAY: Corporate Accountability


I constantly hear the need for "transparency" coming from members of the financial services industry as well as Members of Congress. But if you asked the American people, corporate accountability is a much higher priority. The fact is, a majority of Americans can’t even explain what transparency actually means. But everyone understands and demands accountability from all sectors of the economy ... and the government.

13. School Choice - Parental Choice/Equal Opportunity in Education

NEVER SAY: School Choice
INSTEAD SAY: Parental Choice/Equal Opportunity in Education


Americans are still evenly split over whether they support "school choice" in America’s schools. But they are heavily in favor of "giving parents the right to choose th schools that are right for their children," and there is almost universal support for "equal opportunity in education." So frame the issue right and you get the support you need.

14. Healthcare "Choice” - "The Right to Choose"

NEVER SAY: Healthcare "Choice”
INSTEAD SAY: "The Right to Choose"


This is an important nuance so often lost on political officials. Almost all Americans want "the right to choose the healthcare plan, hospital, doctor and prescription drug plan that is best for them," but far fewer Americans actually want to make that choice, In fact the older you get, the less eager you are to have a wide range of choices, One reason why the prescription drug card earned only qualified public support was that it offered too many choices and therefore created too much confusion for too many senior citizens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Democrat" party is one of my biggest pet peeves.
It shows disrespect on their part. It's like us calling them the Repukes in the national media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
42. It's Democratic Party....Democrat Party is a deliberate slur
The Republicans know that Democrat Party is a deliberate slur, that's why they say it.

I actually think that we should start calling them the Republic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. or "the Democracy"
which is an old name for the Democratic Party.


I NEVER use "Democrat Party". Annoys the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
47. That's it - every time the repukes shout "jump" we just say "how far sir".
NOT a good strategy.

I fight back by ALWAYS using the term REPUKE.

They started this war - let THEM stop it FIRST.

By god, WE will FINISH this war - and THEY won't like it one bit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. Democrat party is like fingernails on a chalk board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC