Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security lapses at Seabrook nuclear plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 04:07 PM
Original message
Security lapses at Seabrook nuclear plant

Full story: http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060811-114547-1439r

Security lapses at Seabrook nuclear plant

WASHINGTON, Aug. 11 (UPI) -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is fining Florida Power and Light for security lapses at its New Hampshire Seabrook Station nuclear power plant.

The NRC is proposing a $65,000 fine.

Service Employees International Union reported Aug. 9 that Florida Power and Light, which owns and operates Seabrook, subcontracts security at the facility to the Wackenhut Corporation, a subsidiary of London's Group 4 Securicor.

Wackenhut is the U.S. government's largest contractor for private guards. Wackenhut currently has multi-million dollar contracts with a number of federal agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Wackenhut security personnel guard nearly half the nation's commercial nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons sites, where there have +been numerous security problems reported.

The NRC fine was issued for Florida Power and Light failing to "maintain complete and accurate records of test results."

The Department of Homeland Security recently terminated Wackenhut's $9.6 million annual contract to protect its Washington headquarters.

Service Employees International Union Director of Property Services Stephen Lerner said, "Wackenhut has again demonstrated an inability to play by the rules and provide adequate security. Until the NRC takes action against this irresponsible contractor, the public can have little confidence that our nation's nuclear facilities are safe and secure."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how you never hear about 'security lapses' at solar
and wind power sources.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of the worst places for a Nuke Plant
I lived near Seabrook for years - watched them build it, protested it - it's one of the worst places for a Nuke plant in terms of evacuation. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC