STANDING shoulder to shoulder with dozens of the state’s top Democrats the day after the party’s primary, Diane G. Farrell looked at ease. Like all the others promising party unity, she was throwing her support to Ned Lamont, the Greenwich businessman who had managed to take down Senator Joseph I. Lieberman.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/13/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/13ctcol.html?ref=nyregionspecial2Just a few weeks before, a similar scene played out on a stage in Waterbury. There, Ms. Farrell, who is running for Congress, stood with the party leaders behind Mr. Lieberman in a show of support for a three-term senator during a rally with former President Bill Clinton. In most ways, then, Ms. Farrell was no different than the rest of the state’s prominent Democrats — she backed Mr. Lieberman until the primary, then switched her allegiance when he lost.
Now, Ms. Farrell is hoping to replicate Mr. Lamont’s victory this November, trying to topple Christopher Shays, the Republican incumbent in the Fourth Congressional District, by turning the race into a referendum on the war in Iraq and President Bush. She lost to Mr. Shays in 2004 in a race in which she argued that he had lost touch with local concerns and was too closely aligned with House conservatives. This time, the race is seen by both parties as a major fight.
There is a complicated dance between the four candidates. Mr. Lamont and Mr. Lieberman are endorsing Ms. Farrell. Mr. Shays, not counting on reciprocity, is backing Mr. Lieberman, who shares his moderate views on some issues, including support for the war in Iraq.