Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Pushes ANOTHER Bad Trade Deal—This Time With Peru

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 10:34 AM
Original message
Bush Pushes ANOTHER Bad Trade Deal—This Time With Peru

Full article: http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/08/08/bush-pushes-another-bad-trade-deal%e2%80%94this-time-with-peru/

Legislation & Politics

Aug 8

E-Mail This Article
Bush Pushes ANOTHER Bad Trade Deal—This Time With Peru

The Bush anti-worker trade brigade is at it again—pushing another bad trade deal. This time, the pact is with Peru, and like all the other deals this administration has made, this one includes no real labor rights guarantees and no mechanism to create good jobs here or in Peru, while offering weak environmental protections.

Even the Bush State Department admits Peru has weak labor laws that fail to protect workers’ rights and restrict workers’ freedom to form unions. In addition, child labor is widespread, and the minimum wage fails to provide a decent standard of living.

The Peru deal is just the latest in a series of Bush trade debacles. This summer, the House and Senate approved the Oman Free Trade Agreement (OFTA), opposed by the AFL-CIO and more than 350 labor, religious, consumer, farm and environmental groups because–like the Peru Free Trade Agreement–the OFTA lacks strong and enforceable labor and environmental standards and likely will cost jobs in the United States and will do nothing to protect the rights of workers in Oman.

The Bush White House regularly claims other countries don’t want enforceable workers’ rights in the trade deals. But they can’t sing that tune this time. Last year, Peru President Alejandro Toledo offered to include internationally recognized basic labor rights standards from the International Labor Organization, including the right to form unions. But according to Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) and Ben Cardin (D-Md.), the Bush administration rejected Toledo’s position because the U.S. would have to change some of its own laws to be in compliance.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bad for whom?
They're only bad for us! They're great for folks like him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC