Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supporters ...What Has Lieberman Done Right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:40 AM
Original message
Supporters ...What Has Lieberman Done Right?
Here is the part I dont get.
I can find endless people who can give me lengthy lists of where Lieberman has gone wrong; the war, foul trade, Alito, Roberts, Shaivo, Pro Credit card Lobby, Willingness to scrap social security, medicaid ect ...
But when asked, his supporters will say that he has also done a lot of good things ...
Hmm ...
Would some of his supporters help me here.
What has he done right. Could you name some of the positive things he has worked for?
I cant think of a single one. If he didnt have a "D" next to his name I wouldnt be able to tell him and Bill Frist apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skeeters2525 Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get Over It
Wow

He lost already. Time for you to get a life.

What has Lamont done right?

Picked an idiot to run against.

Maybe it might be time to put your hatred toward Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Or, you could try answering the damn question like posts #2 and 3 below nt
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primative1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Get Over What?
What could be a more interesting topic on this fine morning?
This is our future here. For myself, I have long been a believer in the rhetoric that the democratic party espouses, but my support has become increasingly muted as I have watched the likes of Lieberman vote continuously AGAINST my "CORE" beliefs.
This is a conversation we need to have as we once again define what the democratic party is. Lieberman was just one race but the outcome of this conversation will define our future.
Is this democratic party one of pure rhetoric or is it the party that acts to make that rhetoric actual policy.
We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Answer his question if it gets you so upset?
Apparently you are mad that lieberman lost? Tell us why? Perhaps YOU need to get over it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am a Lamont supporter but have carried a lot of water for Lieberman
so I will tell you what I admire about Lieberman.

Lieberman was an early supporter of LGBT rights. The fact he is a very religious man makes that support even more beneficial. Few Democrats supported ENDA back in the 1970's which Lieberman did in CT. Lieberman has a nearly perfect enviromental record. Lieberman has been a terrific supporter of Civil Rights. Registering voters in MS was a risky and great thing he did as a young man. All of those are admirable things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I agree
but...Lieberman was only willing to go as far as civil unions, not equal rights to marriage. As far as civil rights go, he voted against some things like habeas corpus recently. He has gone downhill since his big stand in the 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't like Joe but..
He was a tireless fighter for civil rights and he has a very liberal voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lifetime ACLU Rating Only 50% or So
Being in favor of civil rights seems like a no-brainer, particularly for a Democrat. Being in favor of civil rights only 50% of the time seems pretty weak, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. civil rights and civil liberties are two different things
and are sometimes at odds. To take one example, speech codes. Many civil rights groups favor codes banning racist or sexist or homophobic speech while most civil libertarians don't. Thus one can have a great civil rights record, as Lieberman does, and have a mediocre civil liberties record, as he also does. I also know that the ACLU tends to count a very small number of votes per session which skews their scores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good Points, But...
Interesting points.

Counting only a small number of truly-important votes is a good thing - the DLC types have made it a habit to vote to the left on most legislation, but to the right on the things that count - that way they can claim an 85% (or whatever) left voting record, while still delivering the goods to their patrons when it counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. it can be but it also can mislead
I think the ACLU goes to far in the small number direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think voters were voting on his more recent (Bush-era) past rather
than his more distant past. Plus, the arrogant petulance put a lot of voters off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. displacedtexan just posted this excellent list of what Joe's done wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. He exhales carbon dioxide
Which is needed by plants to make oxygen.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quequeg Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. he's made the rich richer EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC