Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rick Jacobs says it better than I could. Lamont defined the CT race.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 05:10 PM
Original message
Rick Jacobs says it better than I could. Lamont defined the CT race.
Edited on Mon Aug-07-06 05:19 PM by madfloridian
I tried to do so the other day. But he says it better.

Ned Lamont Has already Won in Connecticut. Here's Why.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-jacobs/ned-lamont-has-already-wo_b_26702.html

Polls show Ned Lamont poised for victory over Joe Lieberman tomorrow. Polls have been wrong before, so we'll have to wait until tomorrow night to find out for sure, but the race has already defined the 2006 elections. Put simply, Lamont has forced the war to the forefront of debate (again, Arianna was right months ago) and has created a stark divide: voters can choose Lamont who stands up to the president or Lieberman who stands with the president. It's that simple. The America that Joe Lieberman champions when he kisses George Bush, literally and metaphorically, is not the America that is at the breaking point over an empire-breaking war, economic dislocation and no plan in sight to take care of a nation fast polarizing between haves and haves not. Joe Lieberman provides aid and comfort to George Bush, allowing the president to say, "look, Democrats (Lieberman) like what I'm doing." That is inexcusable.

A Lamont victory on Tuesday (which I predicted in May when we completed the DVD introducing him) will demonstrate to Democrats and progressives across the nation that to win in November, we have to stand up now. We have to say no to George Bush's disastrous policies. We have to say that Congress will investigate the corruption and profiteering that is endemic in the Bush Administration's occupation of Iraq. We have to know that the future can hold hope, not more dictatorial despair.

Mindia, remember that the establishment decried Howard Dean in 2003-4. Yet, Howard Dean framed the 2004 election. He tapped into a desire among Democrats and Independents alike for change. He put the war on display, not in a vault in the back room. That's Lamont. Only Lamont may really win. And then we can hope for dozens of wins in the fall because candidates like Francine Busby may learn the lesson of Lamont and of the poll we annoucned from her district last week. Candidates will see that to convince voters they are worth coming out for, they have to stand for courage and conviction and that means standing up to George Bush. In many ways, Lamont has already won and so have we.


Here was my feeble attempt the other day, not nearly so well done as Rick's diary.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/194

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fineman on Hardball sort of said the same thing...
that it would continue no matter who won. He and Rick Jacobs both said it better than I could.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC