Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU urges Senate to reject draft proposal on detainees...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 12:49 PM
Original message
ACLU urges Senate to reject draft proposal on detainees...
This is very serious. As Thom Hartmann said on his radio show today, this is the end of Democracy in America if this passes, because then the Gitmo rules would apply to all of us.

ACLU Urges Senate to Reject Draft White House Proposal on Detainees (8/2/2006)


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Media@dcaclu.org


WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union urged lawmakers to ensure that any legislation regarding criminal trials of detainees being held indefinitely by the federal government includes the basic due process protections valued by all Americans. Both the Senate Armed Services and Judiciary Committees met today to examine the issue. Top government officials, including Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England and the Judge Advocates General for the four armed services testified today on the administration’s position.


"Even during times of conflict, Americans expect the president and Congress to uphold and respect the rule of law," said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "The Supreme Court recognized the military commissions created by President Bush violated the law. Congress must reject any proposal that fails to meet the recognized legal standards embodied in the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions."


In late June, the Supreme Court found in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions at Guantanamo created by President Bush were invalid. The court said that the rules violated Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions regarding the treatment of detainees being held indefinitely.


The White House has circulated draft legislation that would essentially ratify the illegal military commissions, and fail to meet the standards prescribed by the Supreme Court. Specifically, the White House proposal would: gut the enforceability of important Geneva Convention protections; allow the use of evidence obtained through cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment during interrogations; take the unprecedented step of allowing the federal government to convict a defendant based on secret evidence; bar a defendant from being present at his own trial; and allow the use of the types of hearsay evidence banned from every military and civilian court in America.


Even if such legislation is enacted, the ACLU said, the Supreme Court would likely invalidate it. In recent testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Judge Advocates General for the four military services urged close adherence to the court-martial procedures, a system the Supreme Court found provides sufficient due process protections. Additionally, both the Department of Defense and the Attorney General stated the protections of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions must be afforded to detainees held both by the Defense Department and the CIA.


"After being rebuked by the Supreme Court, the White House finally agreed that basic Geneva protections apply to all detainees, but now it seeks to undermine those protections," said Christopher Anders, an ACLU Legislative Counsel. "As Congress deals with this issue, it must enact changes consistent with the due process rights that all Americans cherish. Lawmakers shouldn’t waste their time working on proposals that the Supreme Court will overturn."


http://www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/26330prs20060802.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC